The introduction of low observable (LO) technology on combat aircraft has produced a leap in aircraft survivability, but it has also raised some difficult questions. How do you quantify survivability, and because new technology tends to be expensive, how LO does an aircraft need to be to accomplish its mission? This paper will show how low observability dramatically improves combat aircraft survivability by reducing an air defense's ability to detect, track, intercept, and destroy an LO aircraft. Important aircraft signatures that can be detected such as radar, visual, infrared, and intentional emissions are discussed in detail as well as methods to reduce those signatures. LO and mission planning tactics' impacts on threat system capabilities are examined and examples of LO aircraft penetration of a notional hostile air defense are shown. The conclusion is that through the use of mission planning tactics and low signature, LO aircraft can survivably penetrate heavily defended air space with little support to accomplish their mission.
[1]
Ray Whitford,et al.
Designing for Stealth in Fighter Aircraft (Stealth from the Aircraft Designer's Viewpoint)
,
1996
.
[2]
Steven A. Brandt,et al.
Introduction to Aeronautics: A Design Perspective
,
1997
.
[3]
M. Skolnik,et al.
Introduction to Radar Systems
,
2021,
Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.
[4]
R. D. Hudson.
Infrared System Engineering
,
1969
.
[5]
W. Shrader.
Radar Technology Applied to Air Traffic Control
,
1973,
IEEE Trans. Commun..
[6]
Robert E. Ball,et al.
The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability analysis and design
,
1985
.
[7]
Frank Heilenday,et al.
Principles of Air Defense and Air Vehicle Penetration
,
2000
.
[8]
George W. Stimson,et al.
Introduction to Airborne Radar
,
1983
.