Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability.

Summary feedback involves withholding feedback from subjects until the last trial in a block is completed, and then presenting feedback about each trial. A variation of this method, called average feedback (Young & Schmidt, 1992), presents subjects with only the mean of the trial block. We investigated whether these methods have similar effects on acquisition and retention of a simple motor skill. Five groups of subjects (n = 16 per group) performed 60 acquisition trials of an aiming task involving both spatial and temporal accuracy. We presented average and summary feedback based on either 5-trial blocks or 15-trial blocks and compared these schedules with every-trial feedback. During acquisition, all groups improved with practice, with a slight tendency for the every-trial condition to have less absolute error than the longer summary and average conditions. Analysis of delayed no-feedback retention tests, however, revealed a strong advantage for the 5-trial summary and average conditions compared with the every-trial condition. In addition, we found that for long blocks of acquisition trials without augmented feedback, the performance variability of those trials was associated with retention performance. Results are discussed in terms of how these different manipulations may make feedback less useful during acquisition, but foster the use of certain information processing activities that enhance overall learning.

[1]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations , 1991 .

[2]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. , 1989 .

[3]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Augmented Kinematic Feedback for Motor Learning. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Bandwidth Knowledge of Results and Motor Learning: More than Just a Relative Frequency Effect , 1990 .

[5]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning , 1990 .

[6]  B. Sidaway,et al.  The acquisition and retention of a timing task: effects of summary KR and movement time. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[7]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  E. Thorndike.  The law of effect. , 1927 .

[9]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[10]  J J LAVERY,et al.  Retention of Simple Motor Skills as a Function of the Number of Trials by Which KR is Delayed , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[12]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  B. Sidaway,et al.  Summary and frequency of KR presentation effects on retention of a motor skill. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  C H Shea,et al.  Summary knowledge of results. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  J A Spray,et al.  Absolute error revisited: an accuracy indicator in disguise. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis , 1989 .

[17]  J. J. Lavery.  Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. , 1962 .

[18]  D E Sherwood,et al.  Effect of Bandwidth Knowledge of Results on Movement Consistency , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  J C Hogan,et al.  The role of verbal estimates of movement error in ballistic skill acquisition. , 1978, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[21]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Information Feedback for Skill Acquisition: Instantaneous Knowledge of Results Degrades Learning , 1990 .