Physical activity and the rejuvenation of Connswater (PARC study): protocol for a natural experiment investigating the impact of urban regeneration on public health

BackgroundThere is a dearth of evidence regarding the impact of urban regeneration projects on public health, particularly the nature and degree to which urban regeneration impacts upon health-related behaviour change. Natural experiment methodology enables comprehensive large-scale evaluations of such interventions. The Connswater Community Greenway in Belfast is a major urban regeneration project involving the development of a 9 km linear park, including the provision of new cycle paths and walkways. In addition to the environmental improvements, this complex intervention involves a number of programmes to promote physical activity in the regenerated area. The project affords a unique opportunity to investigate the public health impact of urban regeneration.Methods/DesignThe evaluation framework was informed by the socio-ecological model and guided by the RE-AIM Framework. Key components include: (1) a quasi-experimental before-and-after survey of the Greenway population (repeated cross-sectional design), in tandem with data from a parallel Northern Ireland-wide survey for comparison; (2) an assessment of changes in the local built environment and of walkability using geographic information systems; (3) semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of survey respondents, and a range of community stakeholders, before and after the regeneration project; and (4) a cost-effectiveness analysis. The primary outcome is change in proportion of individuals identified as being regularly physically active, according to the current UK recommendations. The RE-AIM Framework will be used to make an overall assessment of the impact of the Greenway on the physical activity behaviour of local residents.DiscussionThe Connswater Community Greenway provides a significant opportunity to achieve long-term, population level behaviour change. We argue that urban regeneration may be conceptualised meaningfully as a complex intervention comprising multiple components with the potential, individually and interactively, to affect the behaviour of a diverse population. The development and implementation of our comprehensive evaluation framework reflects this complexity and illuminates an approach to the empirical, rigorous evaluation of urban regeneration. More specifically, this study will add to the much needed evidence-base about the impact of urban regeneration on public health as well as having important implications for the development of natural experiment methodology.

[1]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Intervention Mapping: Protocol for Applying Health Psychology Theory to Prevention Programmes , 2004, Journal of health psychology.

[2]  L. Green,et al.  Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach , 1991 .

[3]  Johannes Weber for the , 1990 .

[4]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[5]  J. Sallis,et al.  Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease , 2012, Circulation.

[6]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[7]  Stanley W. Borg Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications , 2012 .

[8]  References , 1971 .

[9]  J. Ware,et al.  How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8™ Health Survey. , 2001 .

[10]  T. Ten Have,et al.  A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Keith G Provan,et al.  Network Analysis as a Tool for Assessing and Building Community Capacity for Provision of Chronic Disease Services , 2004, Health promotion practice.

[12]  K. Lloyd,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in Northern Ireland , 2012, Journal of mental health.

[13]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health? , 2005, Public health.

[14]  M. Cowie National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. , 2015, European heart journal.

[15]  Angie S Page,et al.  Physical activity and the environment , 2005 .

[16]  A. Nevill,et al.  Physical activity, walking and leanness: an analysis of the Northern Ireland Sport and Physical Activity Survey (SAPAS). , 2012, Preventive medicine.

[17]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[18]  D. Wanless Securing Good Health for the Whole Population - Wanless Report , 2004 .

[19]  Daniela Golinelli,et al.  System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[20]  Thomas Cochrane,et al.  Increasing uptake of physical activity: a social ecological approach , 2008, The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health.

[21]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Social Networks and Health , 2010 .

[22]  M. Martinson,et al.  Community-engaged interventions on diet, activity, and weight outcomes in U.S. schools: a systematic review. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[23]  N. Mutrie,et al.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  J. Sallis,et al.  The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[25]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[26]  R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.

[27]  S. Blair,et al.  Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy , 2012, BDJ.

[28]  J. Willis Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches , 2007 .

[29]  Cdhn Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010. , 2010 .

[30]  S. Lusk Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach: Lawrence W. Green and Marshall W. Kreuter Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, California, 2nd edn. , 1992 .

[31]  Amy Winterfeld,et al.  Physical activity guidelines. , 2009, NCSL legisbrief.

[32]  A. Bauman,et al.  Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. , 2007, Health & place.

[33]  T. Revenson,et al.  Handbook of Health Psychology , 2001 .

[34]  J. Allegrante,et al.  Theory-comparison and multiple-behavior research: common themes advancing health behavior research. , 2002, Health education research.

[35]  I. Soerjomataram,et al.  Impact of a smoking and alcohol intervention programme on lung and breast cancer incidence in Denmark: An example of dynamic modelling with Prevent. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[36]  David W. Wetter,et al.  Theory as Mediating Variables: Why Aren't Community Interventions Working as Desired? , 1997 .

[37]  F. Bull,et al.  Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. , 2009, Journal of physical activity & health.

[38]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[39]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Measuring Physical Environments of Parks and Playgrounds: EAPRS Instrument Development and Inter-Rater Reliability. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[40]  Publications Tackling Obesities: Future Choices , 2007 .

[41]  William B. Cissell,et al.  Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research , 2004 .

[42]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[43]  David Brinberg,et al.  Integrating the Unified Theory and Stages of Change to Create Targeted Health Messages , 2009 .

[44]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers , 2013 .

[45]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance , 2012, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[46]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Reaiming RE-AIM: using the model to plan, implement, and evaluate the effects of environmental change approaches to enhancing population health. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[47]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[48]  N. Hanley,et al.  The value of public rights of way: A choice experiment in Bedfordshire, England , 2009 .

[49]  F. Racioppi,et al.  Physical Activity and Health in Europe: Evidence for Action , 2006 .

[50]  e-Comms Team Securing Good Health for the Whole Population , 2004 .

[51]  L. Hiller,et al.  The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation , 2007, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[52]  D. Wanless Securing Good Health for the Whole Population , 2004 .

[53]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Perceived characteristics of the environment associated with active travel: development and testing of a new scale , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[54]  Richard Jones Social Capital Indicators Review , 2011 .

[55]  Lance D. Potter,et al.  Methodology of the outcome evaluation of the VERB campaign. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.