Multisensory cues improve sensorimotor synchronisation

Synchronising movements with events in the surrounding environment is an ubiquitous aspect of everyday behaviour. Often, information about a stream of events is available across sensory modalities. While it is clear that we synchronise more accurately to auditory cues than other modalities, little is known about how the brain combines multisensory signals to produce accurately timed actions. Here, we investigate multisensory integration for sensorimotor synchronisation. We extend the prevailing linear phase correction model for movement synchronisation, describing asynchrony variance in terms of sensory, motor and timekeeper components. Then we assess multisensory cue integration, deriving predictions based on the optimal combination of event time, defined across different sensory modalities. Participants tapped in time with metronomes presented via auditory, visual and tactile modalities, under either unimodal or bimodal presentation conditions. Temporal regularity was manipulated between modalities by applying jitter to one of the metronomes. Results matched the model predictions closely for all except high jitter level conditions in audio–visual and audio–tactile combinations, where a bias for auditory signals was observed. We suggest that, in the production of repetitive timed actions, cues are optimally integrated in terms of both sensory and temporal reliability of events. However, when temporal discrepancy between cues is high they are treated independently, with movements timed to the cue with the highest sensory reliability.

[1]  B. Repp,et al.  Phase Correction in Sensorimotor Synchronization with Nonisochronous Sequences , 2008 .

[2]  Jirí Mates,et al.  A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Bruno H Repp,et al.  Rate Limits in Sensorimotor Synchronization With Auditory and Visual Sequences: The Synchronization Threshold and the Benefits and Costs of Interval Subdivision , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli , 2007, Neural Computation.

[5]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  J Mates,et al.  The Perceptual Centre of a Stimulus as the Cue for Synchronization to a Metronome: Evidence from Asynchronies , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction , 2004, Vision Research.

[9]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[10]  W. G. Cochran Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments , 1937 .

[11]  M. Landy,et al.  Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error , 2003, Vision Research.

[12]  Dirk Vorberg,et al.  Getting synchronized with the metronome: Comparisons between phase and period correction , 1998 .

[13]  B. Stein,et al.  Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  Fred L. Steinberg,et al.  Functional MRI reveals the existence of modality and coordination-dependent timing networks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception , 2007, PloS one.

[16]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Dirk Vorberg,et al.  Linear phase-correction in synchronization: predictions, parameter estimation, and simulations , 2002 .

[18]  M. Ernst,et al.  Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Bruno H Repp,et al.  Multiple temporal references in sensorimotor synchronization with metrical auditory sequences , 2007, Psychological research.

[20]  Jirí Mates,et al.  A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  F. W. Cody,et al.  The accuracy and precision of timing of self-paced, repetitive movements in subjects with Parkinson's disease. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Visual illusion induced by sound. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  MatTAP: A MATLAB toolbox for the control and analysis of movement synchronisation experiments , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Suzanne T. Witt,et al.  Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: An ALE meta-analysis , 2008, NeuroImage.

[26]  Masaharu Kato,et al.  Auditory dominance in the error correction process: A synchronized tapping study , 2006, Brain Research.

[27]  A. Wing Voluntary Timing and Brain Function: An Information Processing Approach , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Resolving multisensory conflict: a strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  A. Kristofferson,et al.  Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses , 1973 .

[30]  Bruno H Repp,et al.  Perfect Phase Correction in Synchronization With Slow Auditory Sequences , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  Estimation of the Wing-Kristofferson model for discrete motor responses. , 2002, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[32]  S. Keele,et al.  Timing Functions of The Cerebellum , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  B H Repp,et al.  Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  M. Brett,et al.  Impairment of beat-based rhythm discrimination in Parkinson's disease , 2009, Cortex.

[35]  Pressing,et al.  Error Correction Processes in Temporal Pattern Production. , 1998, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[36]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  ‘Clock’ and ‘motor’ components in absolute coordination of rhythmic movements , 1989, Neuroscience.

[37]  B. Repp,et al.  Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms , 2004, Psychological research.

[38]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Combining multisensory temporal information for movement synchronisation , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[40]  R Fendrich,et al.  The temporal cross-capture of audition and vision , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  D. Hary,et al.  Synchronizing human movement with an external clock source , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[42]  Menachem Jona,et al.  Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[43]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Temporal ventriloquism: sound modulates the flash-lag effect. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Disrupted Timing of Discontinuous But Not Continuous Movements by Cerebellar Lesions , 2003, Science.

[46]  A. M. Wing,et al.  Being discrete helps keep to the beat , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[49]  A. Diederich,et al.  Multisensory Interaction in Saccadic Reaction Time: A Time-Window-of-Integration Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Bruno H Repp,et al.  Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Modeling variability and dependence in timing , 1996 .