Description and evaluation of the process-based forest model 1 4 C at four European forest sites 2

The process-based model 4C (FORESEE) has been developed over the past twenty years. The 26 objective of this paper is to give a comprehensive description of the main features of 4C and to present an 27 evaluation of the model at four different forest sites across Europe. The evaluation was focused on growth 28 parameters, carbon, water and heat fluxes. The main data source for the evaluation was the PROFOUND 29 database. We applied different statistical metrics of evaluation and compared the inter-annual and inter-monthly 30 variability of observed and simulated carbon and water fluxes. The ability to reproduce forest growth differs 31 from site to site and is best for the pine stand site Peitz. The model’s performance in simulating carbon and water 32 fluxes was very satisfactory on daily and monthly time scales in contrast to the annual time scale. This 33 underlines the conclusion that processes that are either not represented in dependence on on mediumto long34 term dynamic influences such as allocation, or those that are not represented at all but may have a large impact at 35 specific sites – such as the dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) and ground vegetation growth – 36 need to be elaborated for general forest growth investigations under climate change. On the other hand, 4C has 37 shown a great potential for improvement since it emphasizes the representation of boundary conditions such as 38 soil temperature at different depths. Therefore, more spatial differentiation of processes such as organ-specific 39 respiration should easily be accomplished. Nonetheless, by using the PROFOUND database we were able to 40 demonstrate the applicability and reliability of 4C. 41 Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-2 Manuscript under review for journal Geosci. Model Dev. Discussion started: 15 January 2019 c © Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License.

[1]  C. Kollas,et al.  Mistletoe-induced growth reductions at the forest stand scale , 2018, Tree physiology.

[2]  Martin Gutsch,et al.  Balancing trade-offs between ecosystem services in Germany’s forests under climate change , 2018 .

[3]  K. Larsen,et al.  Partitioning of ecosystem respiration in a beech forest , 2018 .

[4]  H. Hasenauer,et al.  Climate variability drives recent tree mortality in Europe , 2017, Global change biology.

[5]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Combining multiple statistical methods to evaluate the performance of process-based vegetation models across three forest stands , 2017 .

[6]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Calibration and validation of a semi-empirical flux ecosystem model for coniferous forests in the Boreal region , 2016 .

[7]  Sergio Marconi,et al.  Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites , 2016 .

[8]  P. Lasch-Born,et al.  Evaluating the productivity of four main tree species in Germany under climate change with static reduced models , 2016, Annals of Forest Science.

[9]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  Simulation of CO2 Fluxes in European Forest Ecosystems with the Coupled Soil-Vegetation Process Model “LandscapeDNDC” , 2015 .

[10]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  A semi-empirical model of boreal-forest gross primary production, evapotranspiration, and soil water — calibration and sensitivity analysis , 2015 .

[11]  P. Lasch-Born,et al.  Forests under climate change: potential risks and opportunities , 2015 .

[12]  Martin Gutsch,et al.  Uncertainty of biomass contributions from agriculture and forestry to renewable energy resources under climate change , 2015 .

[13]  P. Lasch-Born,et al.  The impact of climate change under different thinning regimes on carbon sequestration in a German forest district , 2016, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[14]  M. Dietze,et al.  A general ecophysiological framework for modelling the impact of pests and pathogens on forest ecosystems. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[15]  A stand-level light interception model for horizontally and vertically heterogeneous canopies , 2014 .

[16]  A. Wolf,et al.  Tree mortality in dynamic vegetation models – A key feature for accurately simulating forest properties , 2012 .

[17]  J. Yeluripati,et al.  Environmental change impacts on the C- and N-cycle of European forests: a model comparison study , 2012 .

[18]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere model performance for inter‐annual variability of land‐atmosphere CO2 exchange , 2012 .

[19]  Rüdiger Grote,et al.  Challenges for evaluating process-based models of gas exchange at forest sites with fetches of various species , 2011 .

[20]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[21]  Niels Otto Jensen,et al.  Increasing net CO2 uptake by a Danish beech forest during the period from 1996 to 2009 , 2011 .

[22]  Thomas Rötzer,et al.  Models for supporting forest management in a changing environment , 2011 .

[23]  C. Kollas,et al.  Potentials and impacts of short-rotation coppice plantation with aspen in Eastern Germany under conditions of climate change , 2010 .

[24]  H. Pretzsch.  Forest Dynamics, Growth, and Yield , 2010 .

[25]  N. Arnell,et al.  Uncertainty in the estimation of potential evapotranspiration under climate change , 2009 .

[26]  Bart Muys,et al.  Multipurpose conversion management of Scots pine towards mixed oak–birch stands—A long-term simulation approach , 2009 .

[27]  T. Vesala,et al.  Biophysical controls on CO2 fluxes of three Northern forests based on long-term eddy covariance data , 2008 .

[28]  B. Reineking,et al.  Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[29]  J. Post,et al.  Integrated eco-hydrological modelling of soil organic matter dynamics for the assessment of environmental change impacts in meso- to macro-scale river basins , 2007 .

[30]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003 , 2007 .

[31]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Multiple-use forest management in consideration of climate change and the interests of stakeholder groups , 2007, European Journal of Forest Research.

[32]  Denis Loustau,et al.  Carbon balance of coniferous forests growing in contrasting climates: model-based analysis , 2005 .

[33]  Robert Clement,et al.  On the validation of models of forest CO2 exchange using eddy covariance data: some perils and pitfalls. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[34]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Effects of tree size and position on pipe model ratios in Scots pine , 2005 .

[35]  M. Lindner,et al.  Model-based analysis of management alternatives at stand and regional level in Brandenburg (Germany) , 2005 .

[36]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[37]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Non‐structural carbon compounds in temperate forest trees , 2003 .

[38]  Joe Landsberg,et al.  Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions , 2003 .

[39]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Evaluation of six process‐based forest growth models using eddy‐covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at six forest sites in Europe , 2002 .

[40]  N. Jensen,et al.  Two years of continuous CO2 eddy-flux measurements over a Danish beech forest , 2001 .

[41]  A. Friend,et al.  Suitability of process-based tree growth models for addressing tree response to climate change. , 2000, Environmental pollution.

[42]  Risto Sievänen,et al.  Application of volume growth and survival graphs in the evaluation of four process-based forest growth models. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[43]  M. Linder,et al.  Developing adaptive forest management strategies to cope with climate change. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[44]  Alan R. Ek,et al.  Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[45]  R. Grote,et al.  Integrating dynamic morphological properties into forest growth modelling: I. Effects on water balance and gas exchange , 1998 .

[46]  K. Bellmann,et al.  Changes of Atmospheric Chemistry and Effects on Forest Ecosystems , 1998, Nutrients in Ecosystems.

[47]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  A New Forest Gap Model to Study the Effects of Environmental Change on Forest Structure and Functioning , 1997 .

[48]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types , 1996 .

[49]  I. Prentice,et al.  A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production , 1996 .

[50]  S. Kellomäki,et al.  Role of wood-based products in absorbing atmospheric carbon , 1994 .

[51]  D. Botkin.  Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model , 1993 .

[52]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[53]  K. Loague,et al.  Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application , 1991 .

[54]  Per-Erik Jansson,et al.  Simulating model for soil water and heat conditions , 1991 .

[55]  B. Legg.  Principles of Environmental Physics (second edition). By J. L. Monteith and M. H. Unsworth. Sevenoaks, Kent: Edward Arnold (1990), pp. 291, £14.95, hardback £30.00. , 1990, Experimental Agriculture.

[56]  S. Dyck,et al.  Grundlagen der Hydrologie , 1983 .

[57]  Niedersächsische Forstliche Versuchsanstalt.  Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt , 1978 .

[58]  R. L. Davidson.  Effect of Root/Leaf Temperature Differentials on Root/Shoot Ratios in Some Pasture Grasses and Clover , 1969 .