A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Cellular Mechanical Stresses in Response to Chemical Perturbation

Mechanical stresses generated at the cell-cell level and cell-substrate level have been suggested to be important in a host of physiological and pathological processes. However, the influence various chemical compounds have on the mechanical stresses mentioned above is poorly understood, hindering the discovery of novel therapeutics and representing a barrier in the field. To overcome this barrier, we implemented two machine learning (ML) Models: Stepwise Linear Regression (SLR) and Quadratic Support Vector Machine (QSVM) to predict the dose-dependent response of tractions and intercellular stresses to chemical perturbation. We used traction and intercellular stress experimental data gathered from 0.2 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL drug concentrations along with cell morphological properties to train our model. To demonstrate the predictive capability of our ML model we predicted tractions and intercellular stresses in response to 0 μg/ml & 1 μg/ml drug concentrations. Results revealed the QSVM model to best predict intercellular stresses, while SLR best predicted tractions. Author Summary The ML framework we present here can be used to predict the mechanical response of any anchorage-dependent cell type to any chemical perturbation. The proposed ML can directly predict the intercellular stresses or tractions as a function of drug dosage and/or monolayer/cell coverage area which could potentially reduce the experimental time on studying the mechanics of cells to external chemicals or mechanical constraints. We believe our findings could be helpful in accelerating drug discovery and increase our understanding in the role of cellular stresses during disease progression.

[1]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Reconstituting Stratified Epithelial Branching Morphogenesis by Engineering Cell Adhesion , 2020 .

[2]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Mechanical signaling in a pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell monolayer. , 2019, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  R. Steward,et al.  Perturbing Endothelial Biomechanics via Connexin 43 Structural Disruption. , 2019, Journal of Visualized Experiments.

[4]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Kalman Inversion Stress Microscopy. , 2018, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Patrick W. Oakes,et al.  Lamellipodium is a myosin-independent mechanosensor , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  Tissue stiffening coordinates morphogenesis by triggering collective cell migration in vivo , 2018, Nature.

[7]  Rebecca Lownes Urbano,et al.  Stiff Substrates Increase Inflammation-Induced Endothelial Monolayer Tension and Permeability. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Dissipation of contractile forces: the missing piece in cell mechanics , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[9]  S. Najjar,et al.  Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction and Blood–Brain Barrier Hyperpermeability Contribute to Schizophrenia Neurobiology: A Theoretical Integration of Clinical and Experimental Evidence , 2017, Front. Psychiatry.

[10]  C. Lim,et al.  Inference of Internal Stress in a Cell Monolayer. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[11]  N. Borghi,et al.  FRET-based Molecular Tension Microscopy. , 2016, Methods.

[12]  J. Su Vascular endothelial dysfunction and pharmacological treatment. , 2015, World journal of cardiology.

[13]  C. Hardin,et al.  ROCK2 primes the endothelium for vascular hyperpermeability responses by raising baseline junctional tension. , 2015, Vascular pharmacology.

[14]  Ramaswamy Krishnan,et al.  Fluid shear, intercellular stress, and endothelial cell alignment. , 2015, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[15]  Patrick W. Oakes,et al.  Epithelial rotation promotes the global alignment of contractile actin bundles during Drosophila egg chamber elongation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[16]  M Cristina Marchetti,et al.  Geometry regulates traction stresses in adherent cells. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[17]  J. Millán,et al.  TNF-induced endothelial barrier disruption: beyond actin and Rho , 2014, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[18]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Monolayer Stress Microscopy: Limitations, Artifacts, and Accuracy of Recovered Intercellular Stresses , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Sangyoon J. Han,et al.  Decoupling substrate stiffness, spread area, and micropost density: a close spatial relationship between traction forces and focal adhesions. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Aleksandar Marinković,et al.  Improved throughput traction microscopy reveals pivotal role for matrix stiffness in fibroblast contractility and TGF-β responsiveness. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[21]  Ben Fabry,et al.  3D Traction Forces in Cancer Cell Invasion , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  Casey M. Kraning-Rush,et al.  Cellular Traction Stresses Increase with Increasing Metastatic Potential , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Age-Related Intimal Stiffening Enhances Endothelial Permeability and Leukocyte Transmigration , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[24]  M. Amiji,et al.  Therapeutic strategies for endothelial dysfunction , 2011, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[25]  Helim Aranda-Espinoza,et al.  Endothelial cell substrate stiffness influences neutrophil transmigration via myosin light chain kinase-dependent cell contraction. , 2011, Blood.

[26]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[27]  K. Beningo,et al.  An in vitro correlation of mechanical forces and metastatic capacity , 2011, Physical biology.

[28]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  The role of the cytoskeleton in cellular force generation in 2D and 3D environments , 2011, Physical biology.

[29]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces , 2010, Nature materials.

[30]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Substrate Stiffness and Cell Area Predict Cellular Traction Stresses in Single Cells and Cells in Contact , 2010, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[31]  Christian Franck,et al.  Quantifying cellular traction forces in three dimensions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. de Vellis,et al.  Stem cell‐based cell therapy in neurological diseases: A review , 2009, Journal of neuroscience research.

[33]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Physical forces during collective cell migration , 2009 .

[34]  M. Lewis Stepwise versus Hierarchical Regression: Pros and Cons. , 2007 .

[35]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[36]  Jeen-Shang Lin,et al.  Cell traction force and measurement methods , 2007, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[37]  Eben Alsberg,et al.  FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Ning Wang,et al.  Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[39]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[40]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[41]  I. Morita,et al.  IL-6 increases endothelial permeability in vitro. , 1992, Endocrinology.