Automated electronic reminders to facilitate primary cardiovascular disease prevention: randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Primary care databases contain cardiovascular disease risk factor data, but practical tools are required to improve identification of at-risk patients. AIM To test the effects of a system of electronic reminders (the 'e-Nudge') on cardiovascular events and the adequacy of data for cardiovascular risk estimation. DESIGN OF STUDY Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Nineteen general practices in the West Midlands, UK. METHOD The e-Nudge identifies four groups of patients aged over 50 years on the basis of estimated cardiovascular risk and adequacy of risk factor data in general practice computers. Screen messages highlight individuals at raised risk and prompt users to complete risk profiles where necessary. The proportion of the study population in the four groups was measured, as well as the rate of cardiovascular events in each arm after 2 years. RESULTS Over 38 000 patients' electronic records were randomised. The intervention led to an increase in the proportion of patients with sufficient data who were identifiably at risk, with a difference of 1.94% compared to the control group (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38 to 2.50, P<0.001). A corresponding reduction occurred in the proportion potentially at risk but requiring further data for a risk estimation (difference = -3.68%, 95% CI = -4.53 to -2.84, P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of cardiovascular events (rate ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.10, P = 0.59). CONCLUSION Automated electronic reminders using routinely collected primary care data can improve the adequacy of cardiovascular risk factor information during everyday practice and increase the visibility of the at-risk population.

[1]  D. Clayton,et al.  Statistical Models in Epidemiology , 1993 .

[2]  K. Anderson,et al.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. , 1991, Circulation.

[3]  Detection of undiagnosed diabetes using UK general practice data , 2008 .

[4]  S. Allender,et al.  Coronary heart disease statistics. , 2008 .

[5]  M. Ashworth,et al.  Quality and Outcomes Framework: smoke and mirrors? , 2010, Quality in primary care.

[6]  J. Robson,et al.  Lipid modification: cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease , 2007, Heart.

[7]  Review: computerised reminders and feedback can improve provider medication management , 2003 .

[8]  F. Griffiths,et al.  Protocol for the 'e-Nudge trial': a randomised controlled trial of electronic feedback to reduce the cardiovascular risk of individuals in general practice [ISRCTN64828380]. , 2006, Trials.

[9]  A nationwide adaptive prediction tool for coronary heart disease prevention. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  Bradley N Doebbeling,et al.  Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system. , 2004, The American journal of managed care.

[11]  Diabetes Uk,et al.  JBS 2: Joint British Societies9 guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice , 2005 .

[12]  K. Shojania,et al.  The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  Abha Agrawal,et al.  Adherence to Computerized Clinical Reminders in a Large Healthcare Delivery Network , 2004, MedInfo.

[14]  A. Majeed,et al.  Identifying undiagnosed diabetes: cross-sectional survey of 3.6 million patients' electronic records. , 2008, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[15]  H. Ng,et al.  Testing the equality of two Poisson means using the rate ratio , 2005, Statistics in medicine.