Overview of Fatigue Data for High Frequency Mechanical Impact Treated Welded Joints

Abstractpaper provides an overview of published experimental data on the fatigue strength of welded joints by high frequency mechanical impact (HFMI) treatment methods, In total, 414 data points from four specimen types are available,tests were performed using constant amplitude R = 0.1 axial tension fatigue, but some data for other R rations, variable amplitude testing and bending fatigue are also reported. An S-N slope of m = 5 gives a very good description of both individual data sets and of the composite data Design curve recommendations for the four joint types and for the structural stress-based design curve are given. HFMI treated specimens generally follow the same trend as experimental data for hammer peened specimens, but the degree of improvement is better. Data for large structures, at stress ratios other than R=0.1 and for variable amplitude loading are still needed in order to update the IIW guideline for post-weld improvement. There is a general trend for increasing fatigue strength improvement as a function of steel yield strength but this influence needs further study in order to develop guidelines. Quality assurance measures for HFMI treatment methods must also be defined.

[1]  Gary Marquis,et al.  Failure modes and fatigue strength of improved HSS welds , 2010 .

[2]  Yoichi Sumi,et al.  Effect of preload and stress ratio on fatigue strength of welded joints improved by ultrasonic impact treatment , 2013, Welding in the World.

[3]  E. S. Statnikov,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasonic Impact Treatment (UIT) and Other Fatigue Life Improvement Methods , 2002 .

[4]  S. J. Maddox Key developments in the fatigue design of welded constructions , 2003 .

[5]  H. Shimanuki,et al.  Effect Of Uit On Fatigue Strength Of Web- Gusset Welded Joints Considering Service Condition Of Steel Structures , 2012, Welding in the World.

[6]  Lixing Huo,et al.  Investigation of the fatigue behaviour of the welded joints treated by TIG dressing and ultrasonic peening under variable-amplitude load , 2005 .

[7]  Lixing Huo,et al.  Analysis of the S–N curves of welded joints enhanced by ultrasonic peening treatment , 2011 .

[8]  Re Little,et al.  Standard Practice for Statistical Analysis of Linear or Linearized Stress-Life ( , 1981 .

[9]  Jes G. Andersen,et al.  Comparison of Post-Weld Treatment of High-Strength Steel Welded Joints in Medium Cycle Fatigue , 2010 .

[10]  Virgínia Infante,et al.  Fatigue behaviour of welded joints with cracks, repaired by hammer peening , 2004 .

[11]  Gary Marquis,et al.  Fatigue Strength of a Longitudinal Attachment Improved by Ultrasonic Impact Treatment , 2004 .

[12]  Jakob Isakovich Kleiman,et al.  Rehabilitation and Repair of Welded Elements and Structures by Ultrasonic Peening , 2007 .

[13]  Stephen J. Maddox,et al.  A Case Study Of The Use Of Ultrasonic Peening For Upgrading A Welded Steel Structure , 2011 .

[14]  Lixing Huo,et al.  Discussion on fatigue design of welded joints enhanced by ultrasonic peening treatment (UPT) , 2009 .

[15]  Wolfgang Fricke IIW Recommendations for the Fatigue Assessment by Notch Stress Analysis for Welded Structures , 2012 .

[16]  Imke Weich,et al.  Ermüdungsverhalten mechanisch nachbehandelter Schweißverbindungen in Abhängigkeit des Randschichtzustands , 2008 .

[17]  A. Galtier,et al.  The Influence of Ultrasonic Impact Treatment on Fatigue Behaviour of Welded Joints in High-Strength Steel , 2004 .

[18]  Zuheir Barsoum,et al.  Spectrum fatigue of high strength steel joints welded with low temperature transformation consumables , 2009 .