A three-dimensional registration method for automated fusion of micro PET-CT-SPECT whole-body images

Micro positron emission tomography (PET) and micro single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), used for imaging small animals, have become essential tools in developing new pharmaceuticals and can be used, among other things, to test new therapeutic approaches in animal models of human disease, as well as to image gene expression. These imaging techniques can be used noninvasively in both detection and quantification. However, functional images provide little information on the structure of tissues and organs, which makes the localization of lesions difficult. Image fusion techniques can be exploited to map the functional images to structural images, such as X-ray computed tomography (CT), to support target identification and to facilitate the interpretation of PET or SPECT studies. Furthermore, the mapping of two functional images of SPECT and PET on a structural CT image can be beneficial for those in vivo studies that require two biological processes to be monitored simultaneously. This paper proposes an automated method for registering PET, CT, and SPECT images for small animals. A calibration phantom and a holder were used to determine the relationship among three-dimensional fields of view of various modalities. The holder was arranged in fixed positions on the couches of the scanners, and the spatial transformation matrix between the modalities was held unchanged. As long as objects were scanned together with the holder, the predetermined matrix could register the acquired tomograms from different modalities, independently of the imaged objects. In this work, the PET scan was performed by Concorde's microPET R4 scanner, and the SPECT and CT data were obtained using the Gamma Medica's X-SPECT/CT system. Fusion studies on phantoms and animals have been successfully performed using this method. For microPET-CT fusion, the maximum registration errors were 0.21 mm /spl plusmn/ 0.14 mm, 0.26 mm /spl plusmn/ 0.14 mm, and 0.45 mm /spl plusmn/ 0.34 mm in the X (right-left), Y (upper lower), and Z (rostral-caudal) directions, respectively; for the microPET-SPECT fusion, they were 0.24 mm /spl plusmn/ 0.14 mm, 0.28 mm /spl plusmn/ 0.15 mm, and 0.54 mm /spl plusmn/ 0.35 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. The results indicate that this simple method can be used in routine fusion studies.

[1]  M. Apuzzo,et al.  Computed imaging stereotaxy: experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[2]  J. Mountz,et al.  A reference system for neuroanatomical localization on functional reconstructed cerebral images. , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  C. Wilson,et al.  Multimodality imaging of brain structures for stereotactic surgery. , 1990, Radiology.

[4]  L. Schad,et al.  Three dimensional image correlation of CT, MR, and PET studies in radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumors. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  R. N. Goble,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  H Toyama,et al.  A PET-MRI registration technique for PET studies of the rat brain. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[7]  Bruce D. Smith Image Reconstruction from Cone-Beam Projections: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions and Reconstruction Methods , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  D. Hill,et al.  Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[10]  Manuel Desco,et al.  PET, CT, and MR image registration of the rat brain and skull , 2001 .

[11]  J. Links,et al.  Program for PET image alignment: effects on calculated differences in cerebral metabolic rates for glucose. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  S S Gambhir,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography in animal research. , 2001, ILAR journal.

[13]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[14]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.