AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Van Eemeren. Crucial concepts in argumentation theory , 2001 .
[2] Donald H. Berman,et al. Indeterminacy: A challenge to logic‐based models of legal reasoning , 1987 .
[3] Kevin D. Ashley. Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals , 1991, Artificial intelligence and legal reasoning.
[4] Jaap Hage,et al. Reasoning with Rules , 1997 .
[5] Henry Prakken,et al. Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations , 2003, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[6] J. Hage. Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic , 1996 .
[7] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. Arguing about cases as practical reasoning , 2005, ICAIL '05.
[8] Henry Prakken,et al. Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence , 2003, ICAIL.
[9] Henry Prakken,et al. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning , 1996, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[10] Karl Branting,et al. An Agenda for Empirical Research in AI and Law , 2003, Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems.
[11] Edwina L. Rissland,et al. Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining , 1992, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[12] Bart Verheij,et al. Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic , 2003, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[13] D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .
[14] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values , 2003, Artif. Intell..
[15] Ronald Leenes,et al. Legal knowledge and information systems : JURIX 2000 : the thirteenth annual conference , 2000 .
[16] Ronald Prescott Loui,et al. Rationales and argument moves , 1995, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[17] Henry Prakken,et al. The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey , 2002, Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond.
[18] Henry Prakken,et al. Logics for Defeasible Argumentation , 2001 .
[19] Dov M. Gabbay,et al. Handbook of Philosophical Logic , 2002 .
[20] J. Horty. Nonmonotonic Logic , 2001 .
[21] J. Pollock. Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person , 1995 .
[22] H. B. Verheij. Rules, reasons, arguments : formal studies of argumentation and defeat , 1996 .
[23] Thomas F. Gordon,et al. The Pleadings Game , 1994, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[24] L. S. Lutomski,et al. The design of an attorney's statistical consultant , 1989, ICAIL '89.
[25] Henry Prakken,et al. An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[26] D. Schum,et al. A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence , 1996 .
[27] Bart Verheij. Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes , 2001, ICAIL '01.
[28] PrakkenHenry,et al. Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence , 2003 .
[29] Antonis C. Kakas,et al. Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[30] Jaap Hage,et al. An Integrated View on Rules and Principles , 1998, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[31] Henry Prakken,et al. Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[32] V. Wiktor Marek,et al. Nonmonotonic Logic , 1993, Artificial Intelligence.
[33] H. Prakken. Analysing reasoning about evidence with formal models of argumentation , 2004 .
[34] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..
[35] Paul Bergman,et al. Trial advocacy in a nutshell , 1989 .
[36] Maria Jean Johnstone Hall,et al. The Development and Rapid Evolution of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony , 2002 .
[37] Thomas F. Gordon,et al. Pleadings game - an artificial intelligence model of procedural justice , 1995 .