A Systematic Exploration of Deep Neural Networks for EDA-Based Emotion Recognition

Subject-independent emotion recognition based on physiological signals has become a research hotspot. Previous research has proved that electrodermal activity (EDA) signals are an effective data resource for emotion recognition. Benefiting from their great representation ability, an increasing number of deep neural networks have been applied for emotion recognition, and they can be classified as a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), or a combination of these (CNN+RNN). However, there has been no systematic research on the predictive power and configurations of different deep neural networks in this task. In this work, we systematically explore the configurations and performances of three adapted deep neural networks: ResNet, LSTM, and hybrid ResNet-LSTM. Our experiments use the subject-independent method to evaluate the three-class classification on the MAHNOB dataset. The results prove that the CNN model (ResNet) reaches a better accuracy and F1 score than the RNN model (LSTM) and the CNN+RNN model (hybrid ResNet-LSTM). Extensive comparisons also reveal that our three deep neural networks with EDA data outperform previous models with handcraft features on emotion recognition, which proves the great potential of the end-to-end DNN method.

[1]  K. H. Kim,et al.  Emotion recognition system using short-term monitoring of physiological signals , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  FragopanagosN.,et al.  2005 Special Issue , 2005 .

[3]  Mohammad Soleymani,et al.  A Multimodal Database for Affect Recognition and Implicit Tagging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[4]  Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis,et al.  Emotion Recognition From EEG Using Higher Order Crossings , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[5]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[6]  Chen Wang,et al.  A Review, Current Challenges, and Future Possibilities on Emotion Recognition Using Machine Learning and Physiological Signals , 2019, IEEE Access.

[7]  M. Benedek,et al.  A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Detecting Naturalistic Expressions of Nonbasic Affect Using Physiological Signals , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[9]  J. G. Taylor,et al.  Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction , 2005, Neural Networks.

[10]  Kyandoghere Kyamakya,et al.  A Deep-Learning Model for Subject-Independent Human Emotion Recognition Using Electrodermal Activity Sensors , 2019, Sensors.

[11]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Fast nonnegative deconvolution for spike train inference from population calcium imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Scilingo,et al.  Arousal and Valence Recognition of Affective Sounds Based on Electrodermal Activity , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[13]  P. Kleinginna,et al.  A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition , 1981 .

[14]  Pasin Israsena,et al.  EEG-Based Emotion Recognition Using Deep Learning Network with Principal Component Based Covariate Shift Adaptation , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[15]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Feature Extraction and Selection for Emotion Recognition from Electrodermal Activity , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[16]  M. Benedek,et al.  Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Luca Citi,et al.  cvxEDA: A Convex Optimization Approach to Electrodermal Activity Processing , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  R. Plutchik The Nature of Emotions , 2001 .