Integrated vehicle-based safety systems (IVBSS) : human factors and driver-vehicle interface (DVI) summary report

The IVBSS program is a four-year, two-phase project to design and evaluate an integrated crash warning system for forward collision, lateral drift, lane-change merge, and curve speed warnings for both light vehicles and heavy trucks. This report, covering human factors research and DVI development in the first two years of the program, describes five laboratory studies, four driving simulator studies, and two onroad pilot tests conducted to assess a variety of river-interface concepts related to the development of integrated warning systems. Selected major findings are as follows: 1) For the vehicles selected, warning sounds should be at least 80 dB(A) in the 1 to 5 KHz range. 2) Auditory warning durations should be less than the expected mean response time. 3) No approaches to warning combination (single, dual-simple, dual-hybrid, or multiple warnings) led to noticeably better driver responses, though drivers favored the multiple warning approach least, and for a variety of reasons a dual-warning approach is recommended for IVBSS. 4) Delays between 150 and 300 ms are acceptable for the LDW algorithm. 5) No single prioritization scheme for warnings (simultaneous, priority interrupt, or delayed presentation) is recommended based on the findings from a simulator study. Extended pilot testing is likely to suggest minor refinements to the DVIs developed here. In the pilot tests that have been conducted, all of the warning systems operated as planned, with some changes required to reduce false alarm rates. Overall, drivers reported IVBSS to be intuitive and easy to use. Most drivers stated warnings were received with about the right frequency, and in general the warnings were not distracting. Results from the laboratory and simulator experiments, in particular, are likely to assist future developers of driver-vehicle interfaces for integrated crash warning systems.

[1]  Raymond J Kiefer,et al.  Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Integrating Multiple Alarms & Driver Situation Awareness , 2006 .

[3]  Nitin Gupta,et al.  The effects of adverse condition warning system characteristics on driver performance: An investigation of alarm signal type and threshold level , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  A. Diederich,et al.  Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: Effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  John Richardson,et al.  Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Warnings in research and practice , 1995 .

[7]  R Graham,et al.  Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[8]  James P Bliss,et al.  Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[10]  N D Lerner,et al.  ACOUSTIC LOCALIZATION OF IN-VEHICLE CRASH AVOIDANCE WARNINGS AS A CUE TO HAZARD DIRECTION , 1996 .

[11]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  Designing urgency into auditory warnings using pitch, speed and loudness , 1996 .

[12]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Human engineering guide to equipment design , 1963 .

[13]  Anne Guillaume,et al.  Judging the urgency of nonvocal auditory warning signals: perceptual and cognitive processes. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Integrating Intelligent Driver Warning Systems: Effects of Multiple Alarms and Distraction on Driver Performance , 2006 .

[15]  Ken R Catchpole,et al.  Localizable auditory warning pulses , 2004, Ergonomics.

[16]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[17]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  Learning auditory warnings: The effects of sound type, verbal labelling and imagery on the identification of alarm sounds , 1999 .

[18]  E C Haas,et al.  Perceived urgency of and response time to multi-tone and frequency-modulated warning signals in broadband noise. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[19]  P A Hancock,et al.  Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[20]  John Richardson,et al.  The influence of alarm timing on braking response and driver trust in low speed driving , 2005 .

[21]  Yili Liu,et al.  Modeling Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) and Practice Effect on PRP with Queuing Networks and Reinforcement Learning Algorithms , 2004, ICCM.

[22]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  C. Spence,et al.  The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention , 2006, Ergonomics.

[24]  Steven Mark Belz,et al.  A Simulator-Based Investigation of Visual, Auditory, and Mixed-Modality Display of Vehicle Dynamic State Information to Commercial Motor Vehicle Operators , 1997 .

[25]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[26]  Russell L. Martin,et al.  Learning and Retention of Associations Between Auditory Icons and Denotative Referents: Implications for the Design of Auditory Warnings , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Development of Crash Imminent Test Scenarios for Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems , 2007 .

[28]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control and Alert Modality on Driver Performance , 2009 .

[29]  R W Huey,et al.  Inappropriate , 2020, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[30]  John D Lee,et al.  Auditory alerts for in-vehicle information systems: The effects of temporal conflict and sound parameters on driver attitudes and performance , 2004, Ergonomics.

[31]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Using auditory streaming to reduce disruption to serial memory by extraneous auditory warnings. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  When is Less More? Attention and Workload in Auditory, Visual, and Redundant Patient-Monitoring Conditions , 2001 .

[33]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  An Adaptive Bias in the Perception of Looming Auditory Motion , 2001 .

[34]  John L. Campbell,et al.  In-Vehicle Display Icons and Other Information Elements Volume I: Guidelines , 2004 .

[35]  Gary S. Robinson,et al.  A New Class of Auditory Warning Signals for Complex Systems: Auditory Icons , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[36]  John Richardson,et al.  The effect of alarm timing on driver behaviour: an investigation of differences in driver trust and response to alarms according to alarm timing , 2004 .

[37]  J Edworthy,et al.  Improving Auditory Warning Design: Relationship between Warning Sound Parameters and Perceived Urgency , 1991, Human factors.

[38]  Todd Mondor,et al.  Judging the urgency of non-verbal auditory alarms: a case study , 2004, Ergonomics.

[39]  B M Kotwal,et al.  PRELIMINARY HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES FOR CRASH AVOIDANCE WARNING DEVICES. INTERIM REPORT , 1996 .

[40]  John D. Lee,et al.  Alerts for In-Vehicle Information Systems: Annoyance, Urgency, and Appropriateness , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[41]  法律 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices , 2010 .

[42]  R. Patterson Auditory warning sounds in the work environment. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[43]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Effect of Warning Timing on Collision Avoidance Behavior in a Stationary Lead Vehicle Scenario , 2002 .

[44]  P Moffa,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR COLLISIONS AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS FOR LANE CHANGE CRASHES , 2000 .

[45]  Neil D Lerner,et al.  Multiple Attribute Evaluation of Auditory Warning Signals for In-Vehicle Crash Avoidance Warning Systems , 1995 .

[46]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  The Perceived Urgency of Speech Warnings: Semantics versus Acoustics , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[47]  J. Bliss,et al.  The role of alarm signal duration as a cue for alarm validity. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[48]  J. Edworthy,et al.  On using psychophysical techniques to achieve urgency mapping in auditory warnings. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[49]  D. Chiang Driving Simulator Investigation of Multiple Collision Alarm Interference Issues , 2006 .

[50]  Christopher Nowakowski,et al.  Cell phone ring suppression and HUD caller ID: effectiveness in reducing momentary driver distraction under varying workload levels , 2001 .

[51]  Marie Rivenez,et al.  Perception of urgency and alarm design , 2002 .

[52]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Can Collision Warning Systems Mitigate Distraction Due to In-Vehicle Devices ? , 2000 .

[54]  Jeffrey H. Everson,et al.  RUN-OFF-ROAD COLLISION AVOIDANCE USING IVHS COUNTERMEASURES FINAL REPORT. , 1999 .

[55]  Dot Hs,et al.  Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned , 2007 .

[56]  David Shinar,et al.  Imperfect In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning Systems Can Aid Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[57]  J Edworthy,et al.  Improving Auditory Warning Design: Quantifying and Predicting the Effects of Different Warning Parameters on Perceived Urgency , 1993, Human factors.

[58]  Eunice Warsh Give them a break. , 2009, RN.

[59]  Keiichi Yamada,et al.  Preliminary study of behavioral and safety effects of driver dependence on a warning system in a driving simulator , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[60]  Jan W. H. Schnupp,et al.  The detection of multisensory stimuli in an orthogonal sensory space , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: a synthesis of the literature , 2007 .

[62]  J Edworthy,et al.  A user-centred approach to the design and evaluation of auditory warning signals: 1. Methodology. , 1995, Ergonomics.