Provision of next-generation personalized cyber-physical services

Cyber-Physical Systems are integrations of computation and physical processes. This new approach allows creating functional units with hybrid behavior, being able to perform new and complex actions. In this context, cyber-physical sensors are devices which, embedded in the daily living world, can monitor hidden variables by integrating software data analysis and physical sensing. With this information, a new generation of personalized services may be supported, as users can be provided with the content they need, although they are not aware of those necessities. In this paper a next-generation personalized service provision platform supported by cyber-physical sensors is proposed. Employed cyber-physical sensors include a mathematical model to extract information about the users' motivation. In this first implementation, motivational information is employed to offer adequate content to users in order to enhance their experience. An experimental validation is also provided in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed technology.

[1]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  The attraction of personalized service for users in mobile commerce: an empirical study , 2002, SECO.

[2]  Carolyn L. Talcott,et al.  Fractionated Software for Networked Cyber-Physical Systems: Research Directions and Long-Term Vision , 2011, Formal Modeling: Actors, Open Systems, Biological Systems.

[3]  Borja Bordel,et al.  Process execution in humanized Cyber-physical systems: Soft processes , 2017, 2017 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

[4]  Ramón Alcarria,et al.  Enhancing Evacuation Plans with a Situation Awareness System Based on End-User Knowledge Provision , 2014, Sensors.

[5]  Ramón Alcarria,et al.  A Methodology for the Design of Application-Specific Cyber-Physical Social Sensing Co-Simulators , 2017, Sensors.

[6]  Kang Lee.  IEEE 1451: A standard in support of smart transducer networking , 2000, Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference [Cat. No. 00CH37066].

[7]  Edward A. Lee.  Cyber-physical Systems -are Computing Foundations Adequate? Position Paper for Nsf Workshop on Cyber-physical Systems: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap , 1998 .

[8]  王珊,et al.  Personalized Service System Based on Hybrid Filtering for Digital Library , 2007 .

[9]  Shin-Dug Kim,et al.  Personalized Service Discovery in Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 2009, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[10]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Web Service Personalized Quality of Service Prediction via Reputation-Based Matrix Factorization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[11]  Vincenzo Loia,et al.  Personalized Knowledge Models Using RDF-Based Fuzzy Classification , 2006, Soft Computing in Web Information Retrieva.

[12]  Ramón Alcarria,et al.  Supporting variability dependencies for rule-based service compositions in prosumer environments , 2015, Int. J. Web Grid Serv..

[13]  Hyun Jung Lee,et al.  Case-based context ontology construction using fuzzy set theory for personalized service in a smart home environment , 2014, Soft Comput..

[14]  Borja Bordel,et al.  Self-configuration in humanized Cyber-Physical Systems , 2016, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[15]  Ying Wang,et al.  Bayesian graphic model based user preference prediction for future personalized service provisioning , 2015, 2015 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC).

[16]  Ramón Alcarria,et al.  A Systematic Approach for Service Prosumerization in IoT Scenarios , 2013, 2013 Seventh International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Frank Leymann,et al.  Generation of BPEL Customization Processes for SaaS Applications from Variability Descriptors , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.

[18]  Mohan Kumar,et al.  Personalized service composition for ubiquitous multimedia delivery , 2005, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[19]  Borja Bordel,et al.  Assessment of human motivation through analysis of physiological and emotional signals in Industry 4.0 scenarios , 2017 .

[20]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers , 2003, Software and Systems Modeling.

[21]  Borja Bordel,et al.  Cyber-physical systems: Extending pervasive sensing from control theory to the Internet of Things , 2017, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[22]  Nicholas C. Williamson,et al.  Industrial Salesforce Motivation: A Critique and Test of Maslow's Hierarchy of Need , 2013 .

[23]  A. Maslow.  A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[24]  Sungmo Jung,et al.  Augmented Reality-based Exhibit Information Personalized Service Architecture through Spectator's Context Analysis , 2013 .

[25]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Constraint-Based Workflow Models: Change Made Easy , 2007, OTM Conferences.

[26]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Personalized Service-Oriented E-Learning Environments , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[27]  Wei-Lun Chang,et al.  A hybrid approach for personalized service staff recommendation , 2017, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[28]  Euiho Suh,et al.  Context-aware system for proactive personalized service based on context history , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Schahram Dustdar,et al.  Context-driven personalized service discovery in pervasive environments , 2011, World Wide Web.