Shear zone evolution of granular soils in contact with conventional and textured CPT friction sleeves

Interfaces, and the shearing of soil against them, play a crucial role in geotechnical engineering. As such, understanding the fundamental mechanisms of interface behavior, such as the size, shape, and extent of soil shear zones against geomaterial surfaces can lead to better understanding and design of geotechnical systems and testing methods. The current study presents a series of laboratory studies aimed at spatially quantifying shear zones created through soil–geomaterial interface shearing including mobilized interface strengths with a focus on CPT friction sleeve behavior. Parametric investigations of particle shape and size effects were carried out over a range of counterface surface roughness values. The results show that conventional “smooth” CPT friction sleeves induce solely particle sliding in coarse grained soils, while non-clogging textured friction sleeves can create a combination of particle shearing and sliding that can allow for direct interface measurements in-situ. By varying the amount of texture on an interface, the extent of particle shearing can be controlled, allowing for improved understanding and treatment of interfaces in geotechnical testing and design.

[1]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  A deformation measurement system for geotechnical testing based on digital imaging, close-range photogrammetry, and PIV image analysis , 2001 .

[2]  J. D. Frost,et al.  Statistical analysis of friction sleeve length effects on soil classification , 2004 .

[3]  Barry Lehane,et al.  Displacement pile behaviour in glacial clay. , 1994 .

[4]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  Measurement of Relative Surface Roughness at Particulate-Continuum Interfaces , 2002 .

[5]  M. Boulon BASIC FEATURES OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERFACE BEHAVIOUR , 1989 .

[6]  H. Kishida,et al.  INFLUENTIAL FACTORS OF FRICTION BETWEEN STEEL AND DRY SANDS , 1986 .

[7]  Jie Han,et al.  Behavior of Interfaces between Fiber-Reinforced Polymers and Sands , 1999 .

[8]  J. D. Frost,et al.  Microscale Study of Geomembrane-Geotextile Interactions , 2001 .

[9]  M. Ahmadi,et al.  Thin-layer effects on the CPT qc measurement , 2005 .

[10]  Matt S Dietz,et al.  Postpeak Strength of Interfaces in a Stress-Dilatancy Framework , 2006 .

[11]  Barry Lehane,et al.  Research into the behaviour of offshore piles: Field experiments in sand and clay , 1993 .

[12]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  EFFECT OF SURFACE TEXTURING ON CPT FRICTION SLEEVE MEASUREMENTS , 2001 .

[13]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  A Multisleeve Friction Attachment for the Cone Penetrometer , 2002 .

[14]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  In Situ Assessment of Role of Surface Roughness on Interface Response , 2005 .

[15]  Hideaki Kishida,et al.  Frictional Resistance at Yield between Dry Sand and Mild Steel , 1986 .

[16]  John H. Schmertmann,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR CONE PENETRATION TEST. (PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN) , 1978 .

[17]  J. K. Mitchell,et al.  Reinforcement of earth slopes and embankments , 1987 .

[18]  J. David Frost,et al.  The Importance of Interfaces in Geotechnical Foundation Systems , 2015 .

[19]  A. M. Gokhale,et al.  A general method for estimation of fracture surface roughness: Part II. Practical considerations , 1990 .

[20]  Y. Yoshimi,et al.  A RING TORSION APPARATUS FOR EVALUATING FRICTION BETWEEN SOIL AND METAL SURFACES , 1981 .

[21]  G. Leonards,et al.  Experimental Study of Static and Dynamic Friction Between Sand and Typical Constuction Materials , 1973 .

[22]  H. Kishida,et al.  Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus , 1987 .

[23]  J. D. Frost,et al.  Interface Behavior of Granular Soils , 2004 .

[24]  Masanobu Oda,et al.  Experimental micromechanical evaluation of strength of granular materials: Effects of particle rolling , 1982 .

[25]  Jean-Pierre Bardet,et al.  Observations on the effects of particle rotations on the failure of idealized granular materials , 1994 .

[26]  Roman D. Hryciw,et al.  Behavior of Sand Particles Around Rigid Ribbed Inclusions During Shear , 1993 .

[27]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  Shear failure behavior of granular–continuum interfaces , 2002 .

[28]  J. David Frost,et al.  A Multi Piezo Friction Attachment for Penetration Testing , 2006 .

[29]  Marte Gutierrez,et al.  Numerical studies of shear banding in interface shear tests using a new strain calculation method , 2007 .

[30]  Richard J. Jardine,et al.  Large-displacement interface shear between steel and granular media , 2011 .

[31]  M. Gutierrez,et al.  Comprehensive study of the effects of rolling resistance on the stress–strain and strain localization behavior of granular materials , 2010 .

[32]  M. R. Fox,et al.  II—Practical Considerations , 2008 .

[33]  J. D. Frost,et al.  Peak Friction Behavior of Smooth Geomembrane-Particle Interfaces , 1999 .

[34]  Yasunori Tsubakihara,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF SAND PARTICLES IN SAND-STEEL FRICTION , 1988 .

[35]  J. G. Potyondy Skin Friction between Various Soils and Construction Materials , 1961 .

[36]  S. Diamond,et al.  Effect of Surface , 1982 .

[37]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  Investigation of particulate-continuum interface mechanisms and their assessment through a multi-friction sleeve penetrometer attachment , 2001 .