A European perspective on intravascular catheter-related infections: report on the microbiology workload, aetiology and antimicrobial susceptibility (ESGNI-005 Study).

The laboratory workload, microbiological techniques and aetiology of catheter-related infections in European hospitals are mostly unknown. The present study (ESGNI-005) comprised a 1-day (22 October 2001), laboratory-based, point-prevalence survey based on a questionnaire completed by microbiology laboratories in European (European Union (EU) and non-EU) hospitals. Also included were questions requesting retrospective information for the year 2000. In total, 151 hospitals from 26 European countries participated, of which 78.1% were teaching institutions. Overall, the estimated population served by these institutions was 121,363,800, and the estimated number of admissions during 2000 was 6,712,050. The total number of catheter tips processed during 2000 was 142,727, or 21/1,000 admissions, of which 23.7% were considered to be positive in the institutions using semiquantitative or quantitative techniques. Overall, EU centres received significantly more catheter tip samples/1,000 admissions and had a significantly higher rate of 'positivity' (p < 0.0001) than non-EU centres. Of the institutions surveyed, 11.4% (7.2% in EU countries and 23.7% in non-EU countries; p 0.04) used only qualitative techniques for catheter tip sample processing. On the day of the study, 167 microorganisms were recovered from significant catheter tip cultures (122 patients), of which Gram-positive bacteria represented 70.7%, Gram-negative bacteria 22.2%, and yeasts 7.2%. The five most common microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida spp., Enterococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Overall, 19% of catheter tip cultures were polymicrobial. In the case of S. aureus, 40% of isolates were resistant to oxacillin, as were 63.4% of coagulase-negative staphylococcus isolates. Of 37 Gram-negative isolates, 35% were resistant to cefotaxime, 31% to ceftazidime, and 27% to ciprofloxacin. Imipenem and cefepime had the lowest reported rates of resistance (11%).

[1]  I. Gasser,et al.  Value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis , 1992, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[2]  Cristóbal León,et al.  Guías para el tratamiento de las infecciones relacionadas con catéteres intravasculares de corta permanencia en adultos: conferencia de consenso SEIMC-SEMICYUC , 2004 .

[3]  W. Peetermans,et al.  Catheter-tip colonization as a surrogate end point in clinical studies on catheter-related bloodstream infection: how strong is the evidence? , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  P. Ruutu,et al.  Nosocomial bloodstream infections in Finnish hospitals during 1999-2000. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  L. Mermel,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections , 2001, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  G. Donelli,et al.  A Multicenter Study on Central Venous Catheter-Associated Infections in Italy , 2001, Journal of chemotherapy.

[7]  C. Brun-Buisson,et al.  Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures , 1999, The Lancet.

[8]  P. Francioli,et al.  Prevalence and Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infections in Four University Hospitals in Switzerland , 1999, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  A. King,et al.  Incidence of antibiotic resistance in blood and urine isolates from hospitalized patients. Report from a European collaborative study. European Study Group on Antibiotic Resistance (ESGAR). , 1998, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  M. Nettleman,et al.  Secular Trends in the Epidemiology of Nosocomial Fungal Infections at a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan, 1981 to 1993 , 1997, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  M. Schumacher,et al.  An analysis of two prevalence surveys of nosocomial infection in German intensive care units. , 1997, The Journal of hospital infection.

[12]  H. Richet,et al.  Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[13]  E. Bouza,et al.  A conservative procedure for the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Qualitative intravascular catheter tip cultures do not predict catheter-related bacteremia. , 1990, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.