A Comparison of Block and Convolutional Codes in ARQ Error Control Schemes

ARQ methods of error control can considerably improve the reliablity of data transmission in such areas as satellite communications, computer networks, etc. A number of ARQ schemes using both block and convolutional codes have appeared in the literature. In this paper, the following problem is addressed. Given two different implementations of an ARQ scheme, one using a block code and the other using a convolutional code, such that the bit error probability of both implementations does not exceed some specific value, which implementation has the higher throughput and under what conditions will it be attained? The comparison is made for three basic retransmission schemes using both hybrid and pure ARQ: stop-and-wait, go-back-N, and selective repeat. Numerical estimates of the throughput were obtained using approximate theoretical expressions for BCH codes and simulation results for sequential decoding of rate 1/2 convolutional codes. Parameters optimizing the performance of both block and convolutional codes for different channel conditions and round trip delays were found and were used to obtain these numerical estimates. Comparison of the quantitative results indicates a trend toward preferring convolutional codes as delay and/or block length increases. A binary symmetric channel with noiseless feedback was assumed. Possible implications for the Gaussian channel are also discussed.