The Effect of Limiting the Range of Perimetric Sensitivities on Pointwise Assessment of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma

Purpose Automated perimetry does not produce reliable estimates of true psychophysical threshold in glaucomatous visual fields when the perimetric threshold falls below 15 to 19 dB. It may be possible to truncate testing at such locations and not use stimuli with very high contrast. However, this can only be recommended if it does not harm the ability to monitor change. This study examined the effect of applying such a cutoff by censoring sensitivities in two existing longitudinal datasets. Methods Series of six visual fields were taken from participants with glaucoma or high-risk ocular hypertension in the Portland Progression Project (P3) and Rotterdam Eye Study (RES). Pointwise linear regression was used to find “progressing” locations, defined as a slope ≤ −1 dB/y with P < 1%. An eye was labeled progressing if ≥3 locations were progressing. This was repeated after setting any sensitivities below the cutoff value C (CdB) to instead equal that value for different integer values of CdB. Results In the P3 cohort tested using Swedish Interactive Testing Algorithm (SITA) Standard, censoring below 15 to 19 dB did not reduce the number of eyes flagged as progressing. For the RES cohort tested using the Full Threshold algorithm, censoring below 10 dB did not reduce the number of eyes flagged as progressing, but a modest reduction was seen for CdB between 10 dB and 15 to 19 dB. Conclusions The proportion of eyes flagged as progressing was not decreased by censoring unreliable sensitivities. Restricting the range of contrast used in clinical perimetry may be possible without hampering the ability to monitor glaucomatous visual field progression.

[1]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  The structure and function relationship in glaucoma: implications for detection of progression and measurement of rates of change. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[3]  Holger Rootzén,et al.  An Image Model for Quantal Response Analysis in Perimetry , 1994 .

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Rates of glaucomatous visual field change in a large clinical population. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  J. Wild,et al.  The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Koenraad A Vermeer,et al.  Robust and censored modeling and prediction of progression in glaucomatous visual fields. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Koenraad A Vermeer,et al.  Optimizing structure-function relationship by maximizing correspondence between glaucomatous visual fields and mathematical retinal nerve fiber models. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  W. Swanson,et al.  Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Hao Sun,et al.  Linearity Can Account for the Similarity Among Conventional, Frequency-Doubling, and Gabor-Based Perimetric Tests in the Glaucomatous Macula , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  Michael Wall,et al.  Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  R. Ritch,et al.  Series length used during trend analysis affects sensitivity to changes in progression rate in the ocular hypertension treatment study. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Factors predicting the rate of functional progression in early and suspected glaucoma. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  S. Gardiner,et al.  Nonlinear, multilevel mixed-effects approach for modeling longitudinal standard automated perimetry data in glaucoma. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  Yuko Ohno,et al.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  Parul Sony,et al.  Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  R. Shapley,et al.  The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  H. Rootzén,et al.  A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[20]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[21]  William H Swanson,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Size on the Reliable Stimulus Range of Perimetry. , 2015, Translational vision science & technology.

[22]  S. Gardiner,et al.  Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  W. Swanson,et al.  A two-stage neural spiking model of visual contrast detection in perimetry , 2008, Vision Research.

[24]  J. C. Pashley,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THE VISUAL FIELDS , 1977 .

[25]  A. Afifi,et al.  Comparison of regression models for serial visual field analysis , 2014, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.