A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis.
暂无分享,去创建一个
H. Genant | J. Edmonds | C. Peterfy | P. Emery | P. Conaghan | M. Østergaard | M. Lassere | P. O'connor | B. Ejbjerg | F. McQueen | E. Haavardsholm | P. Bird
[1] H. Genant,et al. The evidence for magnetic resonance imaging as an outcome measure in proof-of-concept rheumatoid arthritis studies. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.
[2] Tore K Kvien,et al. Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[3] M. Østergaard,et al. Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[4] C Peterfy,et al. The EULAR–OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the wrist joint , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[5] J. Edmonds,et al. The EULAR–OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the metacarpophalangeal joints , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[6] Ali Guermazi,et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: comparison of three imaging techniques. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[7] Henrik S. Thomsen,et al. MRI of the arthritic small joints: comparison of extremity MRI (0.2 T) vs high-field MRI (1.5 T) , 2001, European Radiology.
[8] M. Boers,et al. Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.
[9] D. Altman,et al. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.