A Global Test of a Quasi-universal Gamma-Ray Burst Jet Model through Monte Carlo Simulations

The possibility that long gamma-ray burst (GRB) jets are structured has received growing attention recently, and we have suggested that most GRBs and their softer, less energetic brethren, X-ray flashes (XRFs), can be understood within a quasi-universal structured jet picture, given that the jet structure of each individual burst is a Gaussian or similar function. Here we perform a global test on such a quasi-universal Gaussian-like structured jet by comparing Monte Carlo simulation results with a broad spectrum of observational data. Using the same set of input parameters as in previous work by Zhang and coworkers, we confront the model with more observational constraints. These constraints include the burst redshift distribution, jet break angle distribution, two-dimensional redshift versus jet break angle distribution, luminosity function, and log N- log P distribution. The results indicate that the model is generally compatible with the data. This conclusion, together with our previous tests with the observed jet break angle versus isotropic energy and observed peak energy versus fluence relations, suggests that current long GRB and XRF data are generally consistent with such a quasi-standard energy and quasi-standard angle jet picture. With future homogeneous burst samples (such as the one to be retrieved from the Swift mission), the refined GRB jet structure can be further constrained through a global comparison between various observed and predicted burst property distributions and relations.

[1]  Gregory Y. Prigozhin,et al.  High Energy Transient Explorer 2 Observations of the Extremely Soft X-Ray Flash XRF 020903 , 2004 .

[2]  The GUSBAD Catalog of Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2004, astro-ph/0406519.

[3]  E. W. Liang,et al.  The Peak Energy Distribution of the νFν Spectra and the Implications for the Jet Structure Models of Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2004, astro-ph/0403677.

[4]  Heather Ting Ma,et al.  Rebrightening of XRF 030723: Further evidence for a two-component jet in a gamma-ray burst , 2003, astro-ph/0309360.

[5]  P. Soffitta,et al.  Optical and Radio Observations of the Afterglow from GRB 990510: Evidence for a Jet , 1999 .

[6]  Xinyu Dai,et al.  Quasi-universal Gaussian Jets: A Unified Picture for Gamma-Ray Bursts and X-Ray Flashes , 2004 .

[7]  X. F. Wu,et al.  The Luminosity-Ep Relation within Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Implications for Fireball Models , 2004, astro-ph/0403397.

[8]  Jay P. Norris Implications of the Lag-Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma-Ray Burst Paradigms , 2002 .

[9]  Usra,et al.  The intensity distribution of faint gamma-ray bursts detected with BATSE , 1998, astro-ph/9809300.

[10]  D. Yonetoku,et al.  Gamma-Ray Burst Formation Rate Inferred from the Spectral Peak Energy-Peak Luminosity Relation , 2003, astro-ph/0309217.

[11]  G. Ghisellini,et al.  Formation Rate, Evolving Luminosity Function, Jet Structure, and Progenitors for Long Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2004, astro-ph/0401580.

[12]  Testing the predictions of the universal structured jet model of gamma-ray bursts by simulations , 2004, astro-ph/0407443.

[13]  S. Djorgovski,et al.  The afterglow, redshift and extreme energetics of the γ-ray burst of 23 January 1999 , 1999, Nature.

[14]  T. P. Li,et al.  Gamma-Ray Bursts are Produced Predominately in the Early Universe , 2003, astro-ph/0311363.

[15]  D. Wei,et al.  Are there cosmological evolution trends on gamma-ray burst features? , 2002, astro-ph/0212513.

[16]  Luminosity function of gamma-ray bursts derived without benefit of redshifts , 2001, astro-ph/0101163.

[17]  Bing Zhang,et al.  GAMMA-RAY BURST BEAMING: A UNIVERSAL CONFIGURATION WITH A STANDARD ENERGY RESERVOIR? , 2002 .

[18]  D. Guetta,et al.  The Luminosity and Angular Distributions of Long‐Duration Gamma‐Ray Bursts , 2005 .

[19]  S. R. Kulkarni,et al.  Gamma-Ray Burst Energetics and the Gamma-Ray Burst Hubble Diagram: Promises and Limitations , 2003 .

[20]  Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz,et al.  Cosmological Aspects of Gamma-Ray Bursts: Luminosity Evolution and an Estimate of the Star Formation Rate at High Redshifts , 2001, astro-ph/0108200.

[21]  Jay D. Salmonson,et al.  The polarization of afterglow emission reveals γ‐ray bursts jet structure , 2004 .

[22]  E. Berger,et al.  A common origin for cosmic explosions inferred from calorimetry of GRB030329 , 2003, Nature.

[23]  Ryo Yamazaki,et al.  Cosmological X-Ray Flashes in the Off-Axis Jet Model , 2003 .

[24]  D. Lazzati,et al.  Afterglow light curves, viewing angle and the jet structure of γ-ray bursts , 2002 .

[25]  Jonathan Granot,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF A STRUCTURED RELATIVISTIC JET AND GAMMA-RAY BURST AFTERGLOW LIGHT CURVES , 2003 .

[26]  Bing Zhang,et al.  An Analysis of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Break Models , 2002 .

[27]  M. Feroci,et al.  Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts , 2002, astro-ph/0205230.

[28]  Xinyu Dai,et al.  On the Structure of Quasi-universal Jets for Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2003, astro-ph/0310431.

[29]  D. Palmer,et al.  BATSE observations of gamma-ray burst spectra. I: Spectral diversity , 1993 .

[30]  D. Frail,et al.  Jets in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Tests and Predictions for the Structured Jet Model , 2003, astro-ph/0305145.

[31]  Robert S. Mallozzi,et al.  Cosmological versus Intrinsic: The Correlation between Intensity and the Peak of the νFν Spectrum of Gamma-Ray Bursts , 1999, astro-ph/9908191.

[32]  T. Q. Donaghy,et al.  A Unified Jet Model of X-Ray Flashes, X-Ray-rich Gamma-Ray Bursts, and Gamma-Ray Bursts. I. Power-Law-shaped Universal and Top-Hat-shaped Variable Opening Angle Jet Models , 2003, astro-ph/0312634.

[33]  J. Rhoads The Dynamics and Light Curves of Beamed Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows , 1999, astro-ph/9903399.

[34]  S. R. Kulkarni,et al.  BEAMING IN GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: EVIDENCE FOR A STANDARD ENERGY RESERVOIR , 2001 .

[35]  S. Djorgovski,et al.  The afterglow, the redshift, and the extreme energetics of the gamma-ray burst 990123 , 1999, astro-ph/9902272.