Free Recall Test Experience Potentiates Strategy-Driven Effects of Value on Memory

People tend to show better memory for information that is deemed valuable or important. By one mechanism, individuals selectively engage deeper, semantic encoding strategies for high value items (Cohen, Rissman, Suthana, Castel, & Knowlton, 2014). By another mechanism, information paired with value or reward is automatically strengthened in memory via dopaminergic projections from midbrain to hippocampus (Shohamy & Adcock, 2010). We hypothesized that the latter mechanism would primarily enhance recollection-based memory, while the former mechanism would strengthen both recollection and familiarity. We also hypothesized that providing interspersed tests during study is a key to encouraging selective engagement of strategies. To test these hypotheses, we presented participants with sets of words, and each word was associated with a high or low point value. In some experiments, free recall tests were given after each list. In all experiments, a recognition test was administered 5 minutes after the final word list. Process dissociation was accomplished via remember/know judgments at recognition, a recall test probing both item memory and memory for a contextual detail (word plurality), and a task dissociation combining a recognition test for plurality (intended to probe recollection) with a speeded item recognition test (to probe familiarity). When recall tests were administered after study lists, high value strengthened both recollection and familiarity. When memory was not tested after each study list, but rather only at the end, value increased recollection but not familiarity. These dual process dissociations suggest that interspersed recall tests guide learners’ use of metacognitive control to selectively apply effective encoding strategies.

[1]  R. Bjork,et al.  Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time , 2014 .

[2]  J. Gardiner Functional aspects of recollective experience , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[3]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Influence of reward motivation on human declarative memory , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  E. Reingold,et al.  Levels of processing influences both recollection and familiarity: Evidence from a modified remember–know paradigm , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  L. Jacoby,et al.  The Relation between Remembering and Knowing as Bases for Recognition: Effects of Size Congruency , 1995 .

[6]  Ellen M. Migo,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Contribution of Familiarity to Recognition Memory Is a Function of Test Format When Using Similar Foils , 2022 .

[7]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Time Course of Comparison , 1994 .

[8]  D. Shohamy,et al.  Dopamine and adaptive memory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Barbara J Knowlton,et al.  Value-based modulation of memory encoding involves strategic engagement of fronto-temporal semantic processing regions , 2014, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[10]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[11]  A. Castel,et al.  Test Expectancy and Memory for Important Information , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[13]  Carole L. Yue,et al.  Partial Testing can Potentiate Learning of Tested and Untested Material From Multimedia Lessons , 2015 .

[14]  Ryuta Kawashima,et al.  Remembering with Gains and Losses: Effects of Monetary Reward and Punishment on Successful Encoding Activation of Source Memories , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Barbara J Knowlton,et al.  The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Shinji Kitagami,et al.  Consolidation power of extrinsic rewards: reward cues enhance long-term memory for irrelevant past events. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Reward-Motivated Learning: Mesolimbic Activation Precedes Memory Formation , 2006, Neuron.

[19]  Harry P. Bahrick,et al.  The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect , 2005 .

[20]  Holly J. Bowen,et al.  Reward-enhanced memory in younger and older adults. , 2014, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[21]  E. Reingold,et al.  Recognition memory performance as a function of reported subjective awareness , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[22]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Nan-kuei Chen,et al.  Cognitive Neurostimulation: Learning to Volitionally Sustain Ventral Tegmental Area Activation , 2016, Neuron.

[25]  Aaron S Benjamin,et al.  The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[26]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[27]  Glen E. Bodner,et al.  Re-examining dissociations between remembering and knowing: Binary judgments vs. independent ratings , 2011 .

[28]  Kenneth A. Norman,et al.  Listening for Recollection: A Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis of Recognition Memory Retrieval Strategies , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  Post-learning Hippocampal Dynamics Promote Preferential Retention of Rewarding Events , 2016, Neuron.

[30]  Barbara J. Knowlton,et al.  Effects of aging on value-directed modulation of semantic network activity during verbal learning , 2016, NeuroImage.

[31]  Tim Curran,et al.  ERP explorations of dual processes in recognition memory , 2006 .

[32]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[33]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Ken A Paller,et al.  When memory does not fail: familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[36]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[37]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[38]  Alison R. Preston,et al.  Reward Modulation of Hippocampal Subfield Activation during Successful Associative Encoding and Retrieval , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  E. Balint Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[40]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  C J Brainerd,et al.  The two recollections. , 2014, Psychological review.

[43]  K. Murayama,et al.  Money enhances memory consolidation – But only for boring material , 2011, Cognition.

[44]  B J Knowlton,et al.  The relationship between remembering and knowing: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Kathleen B. McDermott,et al.  Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[47]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[48]  Alan A. Wilson,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of encoding in episodic memory: levels of processing effect. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Michael P Toglia Withstanding the test of time: The 1978 semantic word norms , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[50]  Karen R. Brandt,et al.  Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: Remembering is faster than knowing , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[51]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  States of Curiosity Modulate Hippocampus-Dependent Learning via the Dopaminergic Circuit , 2014, Neuron.

[52]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  Adrian W. Gilmore,et al.  The role of test expectancy in the build-up of proactive interference in long-term memory. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[56]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans? , 2002, Hippocampus.

[57]  Alan D. Castel,et al.  The Adaptive and Strategic Use of Memory By Older Adults: Evaluative Processing and Value-Directed Remembering , 2007 .

[58]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  John T Wixted,et al.  Rethinking Familiarity: Remember/Know Judgments in Free Recall. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[60]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  Rachel A. Diana,et al.  Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Mesolimbic novelty processing in older adults. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.