Introduction: On the “Birth” of Uberveillance

When or how uberveillance will be implemented in its full-blown manifestation is still a subject for some intriguing discussion and a topic of robust disagreement, but what is generally accepted by most of the interlocutors is that an “uberveillance society” will emerge sooner rather than later, and that one way or another this will mean an immense upheaval in all of our societal, business, and government relationships. What is apparent from the numerous qualitative and quantitative studies conducted is that microchipping people is a discernibly divisive issue. If we continue on the current trajectory, we will soon see further divisions – not just between those who have access to the Internet and those who do not, but between those who subjugate themselves to be physically connected to the Web of Things and People, and those who are content enough to simply have Internet connectivity through external devices like smart phones, to those who opt to live completely off the grid. Time will only tell how we as human-beings will adapt after we willingly adopt innovations with extreme and irreversible operations. This introduction serves to provide a background context for the term uberveillance, which has received significant international attention since its establishment. Ultimately, the big choices must be made by citizens, who will either defend their freedom or surrender it, as others did in the past. -David Brin (1998), The Transparent Society. INTRODUCTION The conception of the word uberveillance came about during question time at the conclusion of a class I was guest lecturing on the “Consequences of Innovation” in May of 2006 at the University M. G. Michael University of Wollongong, Australia

[1]  Gregory J. Conti,et al.  A framework for analysis of quotidian exposure in an instrumented world , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST).

[2]  Alexander Hayes Cyborg Cops, Googlers, and Connectivism [Leading Edge] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[3]  Katina Michael,et al.  Planetary-Scale RFID Services in an Age of Uberveillance , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Katina Michael,et al.  The Fall-Out from Emerging Technologies: on Matters of Surveillance, Social Networks and Suicide , 2011 .

[5]  K. Haggerty,et al.  Surveillance and Democracy , 2010 .

[6]  Katina Michael,et al.  Toward a State of Überveillance , 2010, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[7]  Chad Swanson Confronting the Confrontationalists , 2009 .

[8]  Katina Michael,et al.  The Fallout from Emerging Technologies: Surveillance, Social Networks, and Suicide , 2011 .

[9]  Katina Michael,et al.  Social Implications of Technology: The Past, the Present, and the Future , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Roger A. Clarke,et al.  Information technology and dataveillance , 1988, CACM.

[11]  Katina Michael,et al.  National Security: The Social Implications of the Politics of Transparency , 2006 .

[12]  Katina Michael,et al.  Uberveillance: microchipping people and the assault on privacy , 2009 .

[13]  M. G. Michael,et al.  Demystifying the number of the beast in the book of revelation: Examples of ancient cryptology and the interpretation of the “666” conundrum , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society.

[14]  Hayes Alexander Cyborg Cops, Googlers and Connectivism , 2014 .

[15]  Katina Michael,et al.  A research note on ethics in the emerging age of überveillance , 2008, Comput. Commun..