Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production

We examine how the relationship between animacy and syntactic structure might be explained in terms of an influence of animacy on the psychological processes that underlie the construction of syntactic structure during language production. In this account, animacy exerts its influence through its correlation with conceptual accessibility, or how easily a concept is retrieved from memory. Animate entities are conceptually highly accessible and are therefore retrieved more easily. Because language production is incremental, easily accessed information is processed first; animate entities therefore tend to be privileged during syntactic processes of production. We consider two possible models of how animacy might influence syntactic processing: through an effect on grammatical function assignment, or through a direct effect on word order. We argue that experimental cross-linguistic evidence supports a third model, in which animacy can simultaneously influence both grammatical function assignment and the determination of word order. Finally, we consider why animacy might not affect word order in conjunctions.

[1]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  The role of local and global syntactic structure in language production: Evidence from syntactic priming , 2006 .

[2]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[3]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[4]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Speech and talk , 1980 .

[5]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  M. Potter,et al.  Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences , 1990 .

[7]  Geert Adriaens,et al.  Parallel Natural Language Processing , 1994 .

[8]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[9]  M. Garrett Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[10]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production , 2000, Cognition.

[11]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy , 2003 .

[12]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Animacy Versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English , 2005 .

[13]  Mutsumi Yamamoto,et al.  Animacy and reference , 1999 .

[14]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[15]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[16]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[17]  F. Ferreira Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy , 1994 .

[18]  Mercè Prat Sala,et al.  The Production of Different Word Orders: A Psycholinguistic and Developmental Approach , 1998 .

[19]  S. Sridhar Cognition and sentence production : a cross-linguistic study , 1990 .

[20]  Mercè Prat-Sala,et al.  Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production , 2000 .

[21]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Remarks on grammatical weight , 1997, Language Variation and Change.

[22]  Elizabeth Davidson,et al.  On putting the horse before the cart: Exploring conceptual bases of word order via acquisition of a miniature artificial language☆ , 1985 .

[23]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production , 1980 .

[24]  Mercè. Prat-Sala Production of different word orders : a psycholinguistic and developmental approach , 1997 .

[25]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[27]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992 .

[28]  Comrie Bernard Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[29]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[30]  Christopher Habel,et al.  Multidisciplinary approaches to language production , 2004 .

[31]  A. Ellis Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[32]  Leon A. Jakobovits,et al.  Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology , 1971 .

[33]  V. Ferreira Is It Better to Give Than to Donate? Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production , 1996 .

[34]  M. Pickering,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.

[35]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  M. Pickering,et al.  Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. , 2002 .

[37]  E. Keenan,et al.  Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[38]  Robert Dixon,et al.  Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages , 1980 .

[39]  Charles E. Caton,et al.  Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 1982 .

[40]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Prototypicality in a Linguistic Context: Effects on Sentence Structure , 1986 .

[41]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. , 1986 .

[43]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[44]  C. Osgood Where do sentences come from , 1971 .

[45]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production , 2003, Cognition.

[46]  A. Paivio,et al.  Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Kathy Y. van Nice,et al.  Task sensitivity of animacy effects: evidence from German picture descriptions , 2003 .

[48]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of function assignment , 2003 .

[49]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  Constituent structure and linear order in language production: evidence from subject-verb agreement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  A. Meyer Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .