Unveiling complex relational behavior in megaprojects: A qualitative-quantitative network approach

Abstract Although relational behavior plays a vital role on improving project performance in megaprojects, the intricate relational behavior among stakeholders has not been fully explored. Based on social exchange theory, this study presents a novel approach extended from stakeholder value network (SVN) to identify the critical relational behavior and unveil the reciprocal multi-type relational behavior exchanges among the main stakeholders in megaprojects. Built upon six relational behavior types and 110 relational behavior flows, a qualitative relational behavior SVN (RB-SVN) model was first constructed. Questionnaire surveys from 224 megaproject managers were then used to quantify the RB-SVN model. By analyzing critical relational behavior types, flows, and cycles, we found that effective communication is the most significant relational behavior type for stakeholders. Owner–designer cooperation could create the largest relationship value through reciprocal relational behavior. The top 10 restricted (dyadic) and general exchanges were also identified to help promote stakeholders to engage in critical relational behavior cycles. This research contributes to the broad literature on relationship management, and more specifically, furthers the understanding of relational behavior networks that strengthen the relationship value of multiple stakeholders in megaprojects.

[1]  Hongping Yuan,et al.  Impact of Contextual Variables on Effectiveness of Partnership Governance Mechanisms in Megaprojects: Case of Guanxi , 2017 .

[2]  Xianhai Meng,et al.  The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction , 2012 .

[3]  Yujie Lu,et al.  Formation of Interorganizational Relational Behavior in Megaprojects: Perspective of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior , 2018 .

[4]  Miia Martinsuo,et al.  Value-oriented stakeholder influence on infrastructure projects , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[5]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Testing the impact of targeted team building on project team communication using social network analysis , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[6]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Partnering research in construction , 2000 .

[7]  Eric Daniel,et al.  Megaprojects as complex adaptive systems: The Hinkley point C case , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[8]  Dedong Wang,et al.  Dynamic changes of governance mechanisms in mega construction projects in China , 2019, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[9]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Stakeholders, issues and the shaping of large engineering projects , 2019, Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development.

[10]  Marjolein C.J. Caniëls,et al.  Collaboration in project teams: The role of mastery and performance climates , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[11]  Zhaohan Sheng,et al.  Governance of institutional complexity in megaproject organizations , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[12]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Interweaving Trust and Communication with Project Performance , 2013 .

[13]  Johan Larsson,et al.  Managing complex projects in the infrastructure sector — A structural equation model for flexibility-focused project management , 2017 .

[14]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects , 2014 .

[15]  Y. Kwak,et al.  Evolutionary Governance for Mega-Event Projects (Meps): A Case Study of the World Expo 2010 in China , 2018 .

[16]  J. Verschoore,et al.  Effect of Relational Characteristics on Management of Wind Farm Interorganizational Construction Projects , 2019, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.

[17]  Herman Mooi,et al.  Sorting out the essence of owner–contractor collaboration in capital project delivery , 2015 .

[18]  Wenxue Lu,et al.  Effect of Justice on Contractor’s Relational Behavior: Moderating Role of Owner’s Asset Specificity , 2020 .

[19]  John E Hogan,et al.  Expected Relationship Value , 2001 .

[20]  S. Hsu,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Construction Megaprojects , 2018, Journal of Management in Engineering.

[21]  Denise Bower,et al.  Forms of Collaboration and Project Delivery in Chinese Construction Markets: Probable Emergence of Strategic Alliances and Design/Build , 2005 .

[22]  Thomas Lechler,et al.  Contributing Beyond the Call of Duty: Examining the Role of Culture in Fostering Citizenship Behavior and Success in Project-Based Work , 2009 .

[23]  Ian R. Macneil.  Power, Contract, and the Economic Model , 1980 .

[24]  Marte Pettersen Buvik,et al.  Prior ties and trust development in project teams – A case study from the construction industry , 2015 .

[25]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[26]  Gilberto Francisco de Oliveira,et al.  Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[27]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Contracting Relationship Trends and Transitions , 2004 .

[28]  Geilson Loureiro,et al.  Value flow mapping: Using networks to inform stakeholder analysis , 2008 .

[29]  Yongqiang Chen,et al.  Asset Specificity and Contractors’ Opportunistic Behavior: Moderating Roles of Contract and Trust , 2018, Journal of Management in Engineering.

[30]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Relational Pluralism Within and Between Organizations , 2014 .

[31]  Björn Sven Ivens,et al.  Norm‐based relational behaviours: is there an underlying dimensional structure? , 2006 .

[32]  Lianying Zhang,et al.  How mediated power affects opportunism in owner–contractor relationships: The role of risk perceptions , 2017 .

[33]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Success DNA of a Record-Breaking Megaproject , 2020 .

[34]  Jun Liu,et al.  Effect of perceived justice on subcontractor willingness to cooperate: The mediating role of relationship value , 2017 .

[35]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  A network-based modeling framework for stakeholder analysis of Chinas energy conservation campaign , 2011 .

[36]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Megaprojects as organizational platforms and technology platforms for value creation , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[37]  Jide Sun,et al.  Owner organization design for mega industrial construction projects , 2011 .

[38]  G. Brewer,et al.  Impacts of Culture on Innovation Propensity in Small to Medium Enterprises in Construction , 2020 .

[39]  Martin Voss,et al.  Impact of Relationship Value on Project Portfolio Success - Investigating the Moderating Effects of Portfolio Characteristics and External Turbulence , 2013 .

[40]  Qingbin Cui,et al.  Organizational Behavior in Megaprojects: Integrative Review and Directions for Future Research , 2019, Journal of Management in Engineering.

[41]  B. Hadikusumo,et al.  System Dynamics Model of Contractual Relationships between Owner and Contractor in Construction Projects , 2019, Journal of Management in Engineering.

[42]  Sujuan Zhang,et al.  How to foster contractors' cooperative behavior in the Chinese construction industry: Direct and interaction effects of power and contract , 2018, International Journal of Project Management.

[43]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Effects of teamwork climate on cooperation in cross-functional temporary multi-organization workgroups , 2016 .

[44]  D. Proverbs,et al.  Trust influencing factors in main contractor and subcontractor relationships during projects , 2015 .

[45]  I. Krystallis,et al.  What Are the Causes and Cures of Poor Megaproject Performance? A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda , 2020, Project Management Journal.

[46]  G. Winch,et al.  Owner challenges on major projects: The case of UK government , 2020, International Journal of Project Management.

[47]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Boosting Public Construction Project Outcomes through Relational Transactions , 2014 .

[48]  Peter J. Byrne,et al.  Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective , 2014 .

[49]  Xinyi Song,et al.  Promoting Information Transfer in Collaborative Projects through Network Structure Adjustment , 2020 .

[50]  Cheryl S. F. Chi,et al.  A relational governance approach for megaprojects: Case studies of Beijing T3 and Bird's Nest projects in China , 2011 .

[51]  Igor Martek,et al.  Sustainable delivery of megaprojects in Iran: integrated model of contextual factors , 2018 .

[52]  B. Flyvbjerg.  What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview , 2014, 1409.0003.

[53]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects , 2013 .

[54]  Cengiz Yılmaz,et al.  Relative effects of dependence and trust on flexibility, information exchange, and solidarity in marketing channels , 2007 .

[55]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Value creating construction virtual teams: A case study in the construction sector , 2010 .

[56]  Yujie Lu,et al.  Quantifying and visualizing value exchanges in building information modeling (BIM) projects , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[57]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Project Network Interdependency Alignment: New Approach to Assessing Project Effectiveness , 2011 .

[58]  Herman Mooi,et al.  Relational factors in owner–contractor collaboration: The mediating role of teamworking , 2015 .

[59]  F. Ling,et al.  The effects of project characteristics on adopting relational transaction strategies , 2015 .

[60]  S. Lui,et al.  Asset specificity roles in interfirm cooperation: Reducing opportunistic behavior or increasing cooperative behavior? ☆ , 2009 .

[61]  Ruidong Chang,et al.  Governing Behavioral Relationships in Megaprojects: Examining Effect of Three Governance Mechanisms under Project Uncertainties , 2019, Journal of Management in Engineering.

[62]  D. Griffith,et al.  The Role of Reciprocity in Clarifying the Performance Payoff of Relational Behavior , 2011 .

[63]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Trust in projects: An empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships , 2009 .

[64]  Andreas Wald,et al.  Relational competence in complex temporary organizations: The case of a French hospital construction project network , 2013 .

[65]  Michael G. Harvey,et al.  Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice , 2006 .

[66]  Jeffrey Boon Hui Yap,et al.  Collaborative model: Managing design changes with reusable project experiences through project learning and effective communication , 2017 .

[67]  Hap Smyth,et al.  Scoping the Management of Complex Projects: A Relationship Approach , 2006 .

[68]  G. Shen,et al.  Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions , 2015 .

[69]  Johan Larsson,et al.  Role of Performance Feedback on Process Performance in Construction Projects: Client and Contractor Perspectives , 2018, Journal of Management in Engineering.

[70]  Suresh Cuganesan,et al.  Investigating perspective taking when infrastructure megaproject teams engage local communities: Navigating tensions and balancing perspectives , 2020 .

[71]  Wenxue Lu,et al.  The Effect of Task Conflict on Relationship Quality: The Mediating Role of Relational Behavior , 2019, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research.

[72]  C. Mothe,et al.  Boundary spanner relational behavior and inter-organizational control in supply chain relationships , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[73]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Relational Exchange Norms, Perceptions of Unfairness, and Retained Hostility in Commercial Litigation , 1988 .

[74]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[75]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research , 2016 .

[76]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China—A fuzzy analytic network process analysis , 2015 .

[77]  W. Bearden,et al.  Dependence, Trust, and Relational Behavior on the Part of Foreign Subsidiary Marketing Operations: Implications for Managing Global Marketing Operations , 2001 .

[78]  Tim Rowley.  Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[79]  Murat Gunduz,et al.  Motivational Factors and Challenges of Cooperative Partnerships between Contractors in the Construction Industry , 2020 .