Impact of co-benefits on the assessment of energy related building renovation with a nearly-zero energy target

Abstract The reduction of the energy consumption and carbon emissions in the building sector is an important target for actions to mitigate the climate changes and different actions are being carried out to promote a transition to a low carbon built environment. However, present standards are mainly focused on new buildings which may result counter-productive in existing ones, due to their technical, functional and economic constraints. One of the most common problems in the current way of assessing building renovation scenarios is that only energy savings and cost are considered, disregarding additional benefits. Many studies, based on real cases, have already highlighted the relevance of these so-called co-benefits, which can be felt at the building level (and therefore they should be considered in the definition of the renovation measures) and also at the level of society. The present investigation has been developed under the scope of IEA EBC Annex 56 project, and a method to integrate co-benefits in the evaluation of the renovation scenarios towards both the nearly-zero emissions and the nearly-zero energy objectives is proposed. It has been applied to case-studies from several European countries and based on subsequent findings recommendations for policy makers and professional owners are presented.

[1]  M. Jakob Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments: The case of the Swiss residential sector , 2006 .

[2]  Lisa A. Skumatz,et al.  Lessons Learned and Next Steps in Energy Efficiency Measurement and Attribution: Energy Savings, Net to Gross, Non-Energy Benefits, and Persistence of Energy Efficiency Behavior , 2009 .

[3]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US? , 2010 .

[4]  Marco António Pedrosa Santos Ferreira,et al.  Shining examples analysed within the EBC Annex 56 project , 2015 .

[5]  Christopher Goodacre,et al.  Integrating energy efficiency with the social agenda in sustainability , 2002 .

[6]  S. Sorrell The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .

[7]  Diana Ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Employment impacts of a large-scale deep building energy retrofit programme in Poland , 2012 .

[8]  L. Ryan,et al.  Spreading the Net: The Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency Improvements , 2012 .

[9]  Karl Höfler,et al.  Detailed Case Studies - a Closer Look at Cost Effective Energy and Carbon Emission Optimization in Europe☆ , 2015 .

[10]  Marco António Pedrosa Santos Ferreira,et al.  Methodology for cost-effective energy and carbon emissions optimization in building renovation (Annex 56): methodology and assessment of renovation measures by parametric calculations , 2014 .

[11]  Robert Lowe,et al.  Post-occupancy interview report: key findings from a selection of Retrofit for the Future projects , 2013 .

[12]  Arthur Grimes,et al.  Cost benefit analysis of the Warm Up New Zealand: Heat Smart programme , 2012 .