Mathematical Modeling of T-Cell Activation Kinetic

T-cell activation is a crucial step in mounting of the immune response. The dynamics of T-cell receptor (TCR) specific recognition of peptide presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule decides the fate of the T cell. Several biochemical interactions interfere resulting in a highly complex mechanism that would be difficult to understand without computer help. The aim of the present study was to define a mathematical model in order to approach the kinetics of monoclonal T-cell-specific activation. The reaction scheme was first described and the model was tested using experimental parameters from the published data. Simulations were concordant with experimental data showing proportional decrease of membrane TCR and production of interleukin-2 (IL-2). Agonist and antagonist peptides induce different levels of intracellular signal that could make the yes or no decision for entry to cell cycle. Different conditions (peptide concentrations, initial TCR density and exogenous IL-2 levels) can be tested. Several parameters are missing for parameters estimation and adjustment before it could be adapted for a polyclonal T-cell reaction model. However, the model should be of interest in setting experiments, simulation of clinical responses and optimization of preventive or therapeutic immunotherapy.

[1]  C. Harding Class I MHC presentation of exogenous antigens , 1996, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[2]  M. Pospišil,et al.  CD 69 antigen of human lymphocytes is a calcium-dependent carbohydrate-binding protein. , 1995, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  From TCR Engagement to T Cell Activation A Kinetic View of T Cell Behavior , 1999, Cell.

[4]  Alexis M. Kalergis,et al.  Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[5]  W. Hendrickson,et al.  CD4 Dimers Constitute the Functional Component Required for T Cell Activation1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[6]  D. Margulies Interactions of TCRs with MHC-peptide complexes: a quantitative basis for mechanistic models. , 1997, Current opinion in immunology.

[7]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  L. Lanier,et al.  CD28- T lymphocytes. Antigenic and functional properties. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[9]  R. Testi,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of interleukin‐2 gene expression by CD69‐generated signals , 1993, European journal of immunology.

[10]  F. Gao,et al.  The CD154-CD40 T Cell Costimulation Pathway Is Required for Host Sensitization of CD8+ T Cells by Skin Grafts Via Direct Antigen Presentation1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Calculations show substantial serial engagement of T cell receptors. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[12]  A. Chakraborty,et al.  Low T cell receptor expression and thermal fluctuations contribute to formation of dynamic multifocal synapses in thymocytes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  I. Sidorov,et al.  Mathematical modeling of T-cell proliferation. , 1993, Mathematical biosciences.

[14]  C. Nelson,et al.  Structural and Functional Consequences of Altering a Peptide MHC Anchor Residue1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[15]  Mary Collins,et al.  The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: new pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.

[16]  H. Grey,et al.  The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. , 1990, Science.

[17]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  A temporal and spatial summation model for T-cell activation: signal integration and antigen decoding. , 2002, Trends in immunology.

[18]  R. Díez-Orejas,et al.  CD4 Dependence of Activation Threshold and TCR Signalling in Mouse T Lymphocytes , 1997, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[19]  A. Weiss,et al.  Negative regulation of CD45 by differential homodimerization of the alternatively spliced isoforms , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[20]  Byron Goldstein,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in receptor-mediated transduction of cellular signals: Receptor aggregation, partially activated receptors, and cytosolic messengers , 2002, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[21]  D. Vignali The interaction between CD4 and MHC class II molecules and its effect on T cell function. , 1994, Behring Institute Mitteilungen.

[22]  L. Turka,et al.  The Proliferative Capacity of Individual Naive CD4+T Cells Is Amplified by Prolonged T Cell Antigen Receptor Triggering , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[24]  P. Allen,et al.  A Kinetic Threshold between Negative and Positive Selection Based on the Longevity of the T Cell Receptor–Ligand Complex , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  A. D. de Weck,et al.  Lymphokine regulation of human lymphocyte proliferation: formation of resting G0 cells by removal of interleukin 2 in cultures of proliferating T lymphocytes. , 1984, Cellular immunology.

[26]  R. Zaru,et al.  Cutting Edge: T Lymphocyte Activation by Repeated Immunological Synapse Formation and Intermittent Signaling 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[27]  C Benoist,et al.  How much TCR does a T cell need? , 2001, Immunity.

[28]  A. Coutinho,et al.  A model of the immune network with B-T cell co-operation. I--Prototypical structures and dynamics. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  Y. Reiter,et al.  Critical Role for CD8 in Binding of MHC Tetramers to TCR: CD8 Antibodies Block Specific Binding of Human Tumor- Specific MHC-Peptide Tetramers to TCR1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  V. Levitsky,et al.  Is the Activity of Partially Agonistic MHC:Peptide Ligands Dependent on the Quality of Immunological Help? , 2006, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[31]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Kinetics of dendritic cell activation: impact on priming of TH1, TH2 and nonpolarized T cells , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[32]  Oreste Acuto,et al.  CD28-mediated co-stimulation: a quantitative support for TCR signalling , 2003, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[33]  V. Kuznetsov,et al.  Kinetics of T cell proliferation: a mathematical model and data analysis. , 1998, Membrane & cell biology.

[34]  R. Pastor,et al.  ICAM‐1 enhances MHC‐peptide activation of CD8+ T cells without an organized immunological synapse , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[35]  J. Carneiro,et al.  A mathematical analysis of TCR serial triggering and down‐regulation , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[36]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  B. Evavold,et al.  TCR Reserve: A Novel Principle of CD4 T Cell Activation by Weak Ligands 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[38]  J. Mauël,et al.  CD69 and regulation of the immune function. , 1999, Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology.

[39]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Computational Model for Effects of Ligand/Receptor Binding Properties on Interleukin‐2 Trafficking Dynamics and T Cell Proliferation Response , 2000, Biotechnology progress.

[40]  L R Pease,et al.  Alphabeta T cell receptor interactions with syngeneic and allogeneic ligands: affinity measurements and crystallization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  P. González,et al.  Modulation of T cell function by TCR/pMHC binding kinetics. , 2006, Immunobiology.

[42]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  T Cell Receptor Signaling Precedes Immunological Synapse Formation , 2002, Science.

[43]  A. Shaw T-cell activation and immunologic synapse , 2005, Immunologic research.

[44]  M. Cahalan,et al.  Mapping the sensitivity of T cells with an optical trap: polarity and minimal number of receptors for Ca(2+) signaling. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  P. Rabinovitch,et al.  CD28 ligation in T-cell activation: evidence for two signal transduction pathways. , 1990, Blood.

[46]  D. Wiest,et al.  On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. , 2000, Immunity.

[47]  M. Nishimura,et al.  Influence of human CD8 on antigen recognition by T-cell receptor-transduced cells. , 2006, Cancer research.

[48]  S. Jameson,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. , 1999, Immunity.

[49]  P. Romero,et al.  CD8β Increases CD8 Coreceptor Function and Participation in TCR–Ligand Binding , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[50]  D. Busch,et al.  MHC class I/peptide stability: implications for immunodominance, in vitro proliferation, and diversity of responding CTL. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[51]  W. Ellmeier,et al.  CD8 T Cell Sensory Adaptation Dependent on TCR Avidity for Self-Antigens1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[52]  R. Germain,et al.  Serial TCR engagement and down-modulation by peptide:MHC molecule ligands: relationship to the quality of individual TCR signaling events. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[53]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  In silico models for cellular and molecular immunology: successes, promises and challenges , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[54]  J. Lamb,et al.  The T cell surface protein, CD28. , 1997, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[55]  P. V. D. Merwe Do T cell receptors do it alone? , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[56]  K. Smith,et al.  The interleukin 2 receptor. , 1989, Annual review of cell biology.

[57]  Kirk W. Johnson,et al.  Ligand Binding Analysis of Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor Complexes by Surface Plasmon Resonance (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[58]  T. Mak,et al.  T cell responses are governed by avidity and co‐stimulatory thresholds , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[59]  P. Anton van der Merwe,et al.  The nature of molecular recognition by T cells , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[60]  M. Jackson,et al.  T Cells Can Use Either T Cell Receptor or Cd28 Receptors to Absorb and Internalize Cell Surface Molecules Derived from Antigen-Presenting Cells , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[61]  J. Frelinger,et al.  Peptidic Termini Play a Significant Role in TCR Recognition1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[62]  Simon J Davis,et al.  Molecular interactions mediating T cell antigen recognition. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.

[63]  Daniel C Douek,et al.  References Subscriptions Permissions Email Alerts Direct Ex Vivo Analysis of Human CD4+ Memory T Cell Activation Requirements at the Single Clonotype Level , 2013 .

[64]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[65]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Supplementary information for Activated TCRs remain marked for internalization after dissociation from pMHC , 2022 .

[66]  N. Burroughs,et al.  TCR dynamics on the surface of living T cells. , 2001, International immunology.

[67]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  C. Geisler,et al.  Ligand-Induced TCR Down-Regulation Is Not Dependent on Constitutive TCR Cycling1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[69]  M. Mardiney,et al.  Measurement of T-cell CD69 expression: a rapid and efficient means to assess mitogen- or antigen-induced proliferative capacity in normals. , 1996, Cytometry.

[70]  Paula Kavathas,et al.  Interplay between TCR Affinity and Necessity of Coreceptor Ligation: High-Affinity Peptide-MHC/TCR Interaction Overcomes Lack of CD8 Engagement 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[71]  Hye-Jung Kim,et al.  Coevolution of TCR-MHC interactions: conserved MHC tertiary structure is not sufficient for interactions with the TCR. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  Graham M Lord,et al.  A kinetic differentiation model for the action of altered TCR ligands. , 1999, Immunology today.

[73]  G. Pedraza-Alva,et al.  TCR-Dependent Cell Response Is Modulated by the Timing of CD43 Engagement1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[74]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[75]  D. Kranz,et al.  Binding energetics of T-cell receptors: correlation with immunological consequences. , 1999, Immunology today.

[76]  M. Davis,et al.  Low affinity interaction of peptide-MHC complexes with T cell receptors. , 1991, Science.

[77]  L. Walker,et al.  IL-2-independent activation and proliferation in human T cells induced by CD28. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[78]  B R Franza,et al.  A logical analysis of the process of T cell activation: different consequences depending on the state of CD28 engagement. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[79]  Simon J Davis,et al.  The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[80]  K. Ramyar,et al.  Induction of T cell anergy by low numbers of agonist ligands. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[81]  R. V. van Lier,et al.  Influence of CD28 co-stimulation on cytokine production is mainly regulated via interleukin-2. , 1994, Immunology.

[82]  A. Shaw,et al.  Immune synapses in T-cell activation. , 2006, Current opinion in immunology.

[83]  N. Burroughs,et al.  T-cell activation: A queuing theory analysis at low agonist density. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[84]  P. Linsley,et al.  Human B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) bind with similar avidities but distinct kinetics to CD28 and CTLA-4 receptors. , 1994, Immunity.

[85]  S. Valitutti,et al.  The efficiency of antigen recognition by CD8+ CTL clones is determined by the frequency of serial TCR engagement. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[86]  M. Bachmann,et al.  Estimation of maximal affinities between T-cell receptors and MHC/peptide complexes. , 1998, Molecular immunology.

[87]  D. Moskophidis,et al.  TCR affinity and negative regulation limit autoimmunity , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[88]  M. Davis,et al.  Thirty-six views of T-cell recognition. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[89]  Andrea Iaboni,et al.  The immunological synapse and CD28-CD80 interactions , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[90]  Denise Kirschner,et al.  A Model to Predict Cell-Mediated Immune Regulatory Mechanisms During Human Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[91]  P. Linsley,et al.  CD80 (B7-1) Binds Both CD28 and CTLA-4 with a Low Affinity and Very Fast Kinetics , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[92]  S. Jameson,et al.  The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model. , 2001, Immunity.

[93]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Adaptive Tolerance of CD4+ T Cells In Vivo: Multiple Thresholds in Response to a Constant Level of Antigen Presentation , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[94]  Matthew W. Anderson,et al.  Cooperativity during the formation of peptide/MHC class II complexes. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[95]  P. Romero,et al.  CD8 modulation of T-cell antigen receptor–ligand interactions on living cytotoxic T lymphocytes , 1995, Nature.

[96]  Andrew K. Sewell,et al.  The Human CD8 Coreceptor Effects Cytotoxic T Cell Activation and Antigen Sensitivity Primarily by Mediating Complete Phosphorylation of the T Cell Receptor ζ Chain* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[97]  Michael Meyer-Hermann,et al.  Geometrically Repatterned Immunological Synapses Uncover Formation Mechanisms , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[98]  Jan Engberg,et al.  Modeling the interactions of a peptide-major histocompatibility class I ligand with its receptors. I. Recognition by two αβ T cell receptors , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[99]  J. Ashwell,et al.  Cutting edge: the CD45 tyrosine phosphatase is an inhibitor of Lck activity in thymocytes. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[100]  D. Margulies,et al.  T cell receptor-MHC class I peptide interactions: affinity, kinetics, and specificity. , 1994, Science.

[101]  Jorge Carneiro,et al.  Three-Cell Interactions in T Cell-Mediated Suppression? A Mathematical Analysis of Its Quantitative Implications1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[102]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  T cell receptor binding kinetics required for T cell activation depend on the density of cognate ligand on the antigen-presenting cell. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[103]  V. Maino,et al.  Normal human CD4+ memory T cells display broad heterogeneity in their activation threshold for cytokine synthesis. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[104]  E. Sercarz,et al.  An integrative model of regulation centered on recognition of TCR peptide/MHC complexes , 2001, Immunological reviews.

[105]  M. Davis,et al.  A kinetic basis for T cell receptor repertoire selection during an immune response. , 1999, Immunity.

[106]  A. Chakraborty,et al.  Correlation of a dynamic model for immunological synapse formation with effector functions: two pathways to synapse formation. , 2002, Trends in immunology.

[107]  Michael D. Cahalan,et al.  Imaging the Single Cell Dynamics of CD4+ T Cell Activation by Dendritic Cells in Lymph Nodes , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[108]  F. Wurm,et al.  CD8beta endows CD8 with efficient coreceptor function by coupling T cell receptor/CD3 to raft-associated CD8/p56(lck) complexes. , 2001 .

[109]  J. Madrenas Differential signalling by variant ligands of the T cell receptor and the kinetic model of T cell activation. , 1999, Life sciences.