GETTING TO KNOW YOU: A THEORY OF STRATEGIC GROUP IDENTITY

This paper develops a theory of strategic group identity that explains how strategic groups emerge in an industry and how they can affect firm behaviors and outcomes. In so doing, it provides a theoretical basis for the existence of strategic groups. We argue that managers cognitively partition their industry environment to reduce uncertainty and to cope with bounded rationality. Social learning theory and social identification theory are used to describe how cognitive groups coalesce into meaningful substructures and how a group-level identity emerges. We describe the ways in which macro level factors condition the development of groups and their identities. We introduce the notion of a strong identity, which characterizes any group sufficiently recognized and attended to by members to affect individual action. Groups with ‘weak identities’ are no more than transient agglomerations of firms and do not exist in any meaningful sense. These ideas are developed into propositions that describe the conditions under which groups with strong identities are likely to emerge. A second set of propositions describes their transformation over time. Identity strength is linked to both positive and negative outcomes in a final set of propositions. We show how strategic groups with strong identities can affect firm performance, resolving a longstanding problem which has plagued strategic groups research and conclude by suggesting some approaches for measurement and future research. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Scott D. Schuh,et al.  Job Creation and Destruction , 1997 .

[2]  D. Schendel,et al.  STRATEGIC REFERENCE POINT THEORY , 1996 .

[3]  J. Devine Lean and Mean , 1996 .

[4]  G. Hendrikse Fundamental Issues in Strategy , 1995 .

[5]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  The institutional construction of organizations : international and longitudinal studies , 1995 .

[6]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of organizations , 1996 .

[7]  Joel Podolny A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Cultures of Work Organizations. , 1992 .

[9]  P. Ghemawat Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy , 1991 .

[10]  David M. Kreps Corporate culture and economic theory , 1990 .

[11]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[12]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategic groups: Untested assertions and research proposals , 1990 .

[13]  K. Shepsle,et al.  Perspectives on Positive Political Economy: REFLECTIONS ON THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS , 1990 .

[14]  R. Boudon,et al.  A critical dictionary of sociology , 1991 .

[15]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[16]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[17]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[18]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[19]  小山 和伸 Academy of Management Review : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[20]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[21]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Examining change in the long-term context of Culture and Politics , 1985 .

[22]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  Industry influences on strategy reformulation , 1982 .

[23]  K. Cameron,et al.  Coffin nails and corporate strategies , 1982 .

[24]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[25]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[26]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[27]  M. Porter,et al.  From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition , 1977 .

[28]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[29]  Almarin Phillips,et al.  A Theory of Interfirm Organization , 1960 .

[30]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economics , 1870, The Indian medical gazette.