Visual Identification following Inferotemporal Ablation in the Monkey

Nine monkeys took part in two experiments on visual learning and the effect of inferotemporal ablation. The first experiment contrasted lesion effects in two tasks given to separate groups of animals: serial visual reversal learning set with only two visual stimuli in use throughout the experiment, and discrimination learning set with a new pair of visual stimuli for each discrimination problem. Following inferotemporal ablation, the within-reversal learning rate recovered to the normal pre-operative level, while within-problem learning in discrimination learning set remained substantially impaired. This result suggests that inferotemporal ablation does not directly impair visual associative learning, but rather produces a defect in visual identification such that only a small set of familiar stimuli can be correctly identified and associated with reward. The second experiment replicated an earlier experiment in showing that monkeys with inferotemporal ablation could learn at a normal rate to choose between stimuli according to their spatial orientation. A relation between the two types of unimpaired visual learning in the operated animals was suggested and analogies with clinical syndromes were discussed. The experimental results were interpreted within a distributed-trace model of learning, and this interpretation was illustrated and supported by a computer simulation presented in the Appendix.

[1]  P. Dean,et al.  Effects of inferotemporal lesions on the behavior of monkeys. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus--reinforcement associations. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[3]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  A composite holographic associative recall model , 1982 .

[4]  James A. Anderson,et al.  A theory for the recognition of items from short memorized lists , 1973 .

[5]  M. Critchley THE PROBLEM OF VISUAL AGNOSIA. , 1964, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[6]  A. M. Schrier Learning-set formation by three species of macaque monkeys. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  B. Murdock A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[8]  A. M. Laursen A lasting impairment in circle-ellipse discrimination after inferotemporal lesions in monkeys , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  M. Mishkin A memory system in the monkey. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  Measurement of Trace Strength in Memory for Pictures , 1978 .

[11]  S. Iversen CHAPTER 5 – BRAIN LESIONS AND MEMORY IN ANIMALS: A REAPPRAISAL , 1983 .

[12]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Single and Concurrent Discrimination Learning by Monkeys after Lesions of Inferotemporal Cortex , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  F. Manning Serial reversal learning by monkeys with inferotemporal or foveal prestriate lesions. , 1972, Physiology & behavior.

[14]  K H PRIBRAM,et al.  A further experimental analysis of the behavioral deficit that follows injury to the primate frontal cortex. , 1961, Experimental neurology.

[15]  DETECTION OF MASKED PATTERNS IN MONKEYS WITH INFEROTEMPORAL, STRIATE OR DORSOLATERAL FRONTAL LESIONS* , 1972 .

[16]  G Holmes,et al.  DISTURBANCES OF VISUAL ORIENTATION , 1918, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Ray Pike,et al.  Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition , 1984 .

[19]  D. Crowne,et al.  Effects of anterior and posterior inferotemporal lesions on discrimination reversal in the monkey , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  C. Butter Detection of masked patterns in monkeys with inferotemporal, striate or dorsolateral frontal lesions. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  W. Pohl,et al.  Dissociation of spatial discrimination deficits following frontal and parietal lesions in monkeys. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[23]  K. Pribram,et al.  The effect of inferotemporal or foveal prestriate ablation on serial reversal learning in monkeys , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  R. Saunders,et al.  Effects of Fornix Transection upon Associative Memory in Monkeys: Role of the Hippocampus in Learned Action , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[25]  C G Gross,et al.  Inferior temporal lesions do not impair discrimination of rotated patterns in monkeys. , 1978, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.