Assays for toxicity studies in C. elegans with Bt crystal proteins.

Caenorhabditis elegans is well suited for toxicological studies owing to its established biology, short generation time, large brood size, and readily scorable life traits. Quantitative parameters of C. elegans that can be assayed include growth, size, progeny production, behavior, and mortality. Qualitative parameters of toxicity, such as changes in appearance or movement, can also be determined. This chapter describes four assays we have used for analyzing the toxic effects of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins toward C. elegans. The assays are quantitative growth measurement, brood size measurement, and determination of lethal concentration, as well as a qualitative health assay based on worm appearance. Although these assays are described for crystal proteins, the approaches are suited for the studies of other toxins with C. elegans.

[1]  C. Kenyon.  The Plasticity of Aging: Insights from Long-Lived Mutants , 2005, Cell.

[2]  Cynthie Wong,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins that target nematodes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D. H. Mitchell,et al.  Synchronous growth and aging of Caenorhabditis elegans in the presence of fluorodeoxyuridine. , 1979, Journal of gerontology.

[4]  H. Schulenburg,et al.  Natural variation in the response of Caenorhabditis elegans towards Bacillus thuringiensis , 2004, Parasitology.

[5]  J. Sulston.  Caenorhabditis elegans: The Cell Lineage and Beyond (Nobel Lecture) , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[6]  Hinrich Schulenburg,et al.  Evolution of the innate immune system: the worm perspective , 2004, Immunological reviews.

[7]  A. Dell,et al.  Glycolipids as Receptors for Bacillus thuringiensis Crystal Toxin , 2005, Science.

[8]  Erik M. Jorgensen,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: Caenorhabditis elegans , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  R. Hosono.  Sterilization and growth inhibition of Caenorhabditis elegans by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine , 1978, Experimental Gerontology.

[10]  C. Johnson,et al.  Genetic pharmacology: interactions between drugs and gene products in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1995, Methods in cell biology.

[11]  D. H. Mitchell,et al.  A simple method for maintaining large, aging populations of Caenorhabditis elegans , 1980, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[12]  H. Horvitz.  Worms, Life, and Death (Nobel Lecture) , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[13]  T. Hennet,et al.  Resistance to a Bacterial Toxin Is Mediated by Removal of a Conserved Glycosylation Pathway Required for Toxin-Host Interactions* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Frederick M Ausubel,et al.  Evolutionary perspectives on innate immunity from the study of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2005, Current opinion in immunology.

[15]  R. Dhawan,et al.  Comparison of lethality, reproduction, and behavior as toxicological endpoints in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1999, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[16]  S. Höss,et al.  Ecotoxicological assessment of aquatic sediments with Caenorhabditis elegans (nematoda) — a method for testing liquid medium and whole‐sediment samples , 1997 .

[17]  B. Wingerd,et al.  Bt: mode of action and use. , 2003, Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology.

[18]  Sydney Brenner,et al.  Nature's Gift to Science (Nobel Lecture) , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[19]  N. Crickmore,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Pesticidal Crystal Proteins , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[20]  Phillip L. Williams,et al.  Use of ion characteristics to predict relative toxicity of mono-, di- and trivalent metal ions: Caenorhabditis elegans LC50 , 1998 .

[21]  J. Corbeil,et al.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways defend against bacterial pore-forming toxins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  F. Ausubel,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa killing of Caenorhabditis elegans used to identify P. aeruginosa virulence factors. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  L. Marroquin,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin susceptibility and isolation of resistance mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2000, Genetics.

[24]  S. Brenner.  The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1974, Genetics.

[25]  J. Griffitts,et al.  Pore worms: using Caenorhabditis elegans to study how bacterial toxins interact with their target host. , 2004, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[26]  Jonathan Hodgkin,et al.  Responses to infection and possible recognition strategies in the innate immune system of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2004, Molecular immunology.

[27]  D B Dusenbery,et al.  Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis Elegans To Predict Mammalian Acute Lethality To Metallic Salts , 1988, Toxicology and industrial health.

[28]  J. Griffitts,et al.  Bt Toxin Resistance from Loss of a Putative Carbohydrate-Modifying Enzyme , 2001, Science.

[29]  J. Popham,et al.  Cadmium toxicity in the free-living nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1979, Environmental research.

[30]  J A Dent,et al.  The genetics of ivermectin resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.