Structure and dynamics of Mercury's magnetospheric cusp: MESSENGER measurements of protons and planetary ions

The MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft has observed the northern magnetospheric cusp of Mercury regularly since the probe was inserted into orbit about the innermost planet in March 2011. Observations from the Fast Imaging Plasma Spectrometer (FIPS) made at altitudes  10 cm−3) that are exceeded only by those observed in the magnetosheath. These high plasma densities are also associated with strong diamagnetic depressions observed by MESSENGER's Magnetometer. Plasma in the cusp may originate from several sources: (1) Direct inflow from the magnetosheath, (2) locally produced planetary photoions and ions sputtered off the surface from solar wind impact and then accelerated upward, and (3) flow of magnetosheath and magnetospheric plasma accelerated from dayside reconnection X-lines. We surveyed 518 cusp passes by MESSENGER, focusing on the spatial distribution, energy spectra, and pitch-angle distributions of protons and Na+-group ions. Of those, we selected 77 cusp passes during which substantial Na+-group ion populations were present for a more detailed analysis. We find that Mercury's cusp is a highly dynamic region, both in spatial extent and plasma composition and energies. From the three-dimensional plasma distributions observed by FIPS, protons with mean energies of 1 keV were found flowing down into the cusp (i.e., source (1) above). The distribution of pitch angles of these protons showed a depletion in the direction away from the surface, indicating that ions within 40° of the magnetic field direction are in the loss cone, lost to the surface rather than being reflected by the magnetic field. In contrast, Na+-group ions show two distinct behaviors depending on their energy. Low-energy (100–300 eV) ions appear to be streaming out of the cusp, showing pitch-angle distributions with a strong component antiparallel to the magnetic field (away from the surface). These ions appear to have been generated in the cusp and accelerated locally (i.e., source (2) above). Higher-energy (≥1 keV) Na+-group ions in the cusp exhibit much larger perpendicular components in their energy distributions. During active times, as judged by frequent, large-amplitude magnetic field fluctuations, many more Na+-group ions are measured at latitudes south of the cusp. In several cases, these Na+-group ions in the dayside magnetosphere are flowing northward toward the cusp. The high mean energy, pitch-angle distributions, and large number of Na+-group ions on dayside magnetospheric field lines are inconsistent with direct transport into the cusp of sputtered ions from the surface or newly photoionized particles. Furthermore, the highest densities and mean energies often occur together with high-amplitude magnetic fluctuations, attributed to flux transfer events along the magnetopause. These results indicate that high-energy Na+-group ions in the cusp are likely formed by ionization of escaping neutral Na in the outer dayside magnetosphere and the magnetosheath followed by acceleration and transport into the cusp by reconnection at the subsolar magnetopause (i.e., source 3 above).

[1]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetic flux pileup and plasma depletion in Mercury's subsolar magnetosheath , 2013 .

[2]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Distribution and compositional variations of plasma ions in Mercury's space environment: The first three Mercury years of MESSENGER observations , 2013 .

[3]  H. Rosenbauer,et al.  Plasma and Magnetic Field Characteristics of the Distant Polar Cusp near Local Noon: The Entry Layer , 1976 .

[4]  M. F. Smith,et al.  Earth's magnetospheric cusps , 1996 .

[5]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  MESSENGER observations of dipolarization events in Mercury's magnetotail , 2012 .

[6]  George Gloeckler,et al.  MESSENGER Observations of the Spatial Distribution of Planetary Ions Near Mercury , 2011, Science.

[7]  Helmut Lammer,et al.  Mapping of the cusp plasma precipitation on the surface of Mercury , 2003 .

[8]  B. Sonnerup,et al.  Magnetopause reconnection rate , 1974 .

[9]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Monte Carlo model of sputtering and other ejection processes within a regolith , 2005 .

[10]  James A. Slavin,et al.  Observations of Mercury's northern cusp region with MESSENGER's Magnetometer , 2011 .

[11]  W. Ip,et al.  On the impact of multiply charged heavy solar wind ions on the surface of Mercury, the Moon and Ceres , 2008 .

[12]  J. Slavin,et al.  On the possible formation of Alfvén wings at Mercury during encounters with coronal mass ejections , 2009 .

[13]  M. Hudson,et al.  Lower hybrid heating of ionospheric ions due to ion ring distributions in the cusp , 1985 .

[14]  François Leblanc,et al.  Mercury's sodium exosphere , 2003 .

[15]  H. Rosenbauer,et al.  Heos 2 plasma observations in the distant polar magnetosphere: The plasma mantle , 1975 .

[16]  J. Retterer,et al.  Ion acceleration in the suprauroral region: A Monte Carlo Model , 1983 .

[17]  G. Paschmann,et al.  The frontside boundary layer of the magnetosphere and the problem of reconnection , 1977 .

[18]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  The cleft ion fountain , 1985 .

[19]  F. Leblanc,et al.  Mercury exosphere I. Global circulation model of its sodium component , 2010 .

[20]  S. Solomon,et al.  THE VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION OF PICKUP He+ MEASURED AT 0.3 AU BY MESSENGER , 2014 .

[21]  Manish R. Patel,et al.  The variability of Mercury's exosphere by particle and radiation induced surface release processes , 2003 .

[22]  Mark R. Lankton,et al.  The Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer for the MESSENGER Mission , 2007 .

[23]  J. Horwitz Features of ion trajectories in the polar magnetosphere , 1984 .

[24]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape , 1997 .

[25]  Richard D. Starr,et al.  Mercury's Magnetosphere After MESSENGER's First Flyby , 2008, Science.

[26]  J. Slavin,et al.  Paraboloid model of Mercury's magnetosphere , 2008 .

[27]  Patrick T. Newell,et al.  Hemispherical asymmetry in cusp precipitation near solstices , 1988 .

[28]  Helmut Lammer,et al.  Surface-Exosphere-Magnetosphere System Of Mercury , 2005 .

[29]  M. Ashour‐Abdalla,et al.  Acceleration of heavy ions on auroral field lines , 1981 .

[30]  William E. McClintock,et al.  Mercury’s Complex Exosphere: Results from MESSENGER’s Third Flyby , 2010, Science.

[31]  Thomas H. Zurbuchen,et al.  Low-weight plasma instrument to be used in the inner heliosphere , 1998, Optics & Photonics.

[32]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Cluster Observes the High-Altitude CUSP Region , 2005 .

[33]  A. Sprague,et al.  Electron‐stimulated desorption of silicates: A potential source for ions in Mercury's space environment , 2011 .

[34]  T. Moore,et al.  Centrifugally stimulated exospheric ion escape at Mercury , 2012 .

[35]  S. Solomon,et al.  Characteristics of the plasma distribution in Mercury's equatorial magnetosphere derived from MESSENGER Magnetometer observations , 2012 .

[36]  Pekka Janhunen,et al.  Solar wind and magnetospheric ion impact on Mercury's surface , 2003 .

[37]  C. Owen,et al.  A SIMPLE ILLUSTRATIVE MODEL OF OPEN FLUX TUBE MOTION OVER THE DAYSIDE MAGNETOPAUSE , 1989 .

[38]  S. Solomon,et al.  Observations of interstellar helium pickup ions in the inner heliosphere , 2011 .

[39]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Mercury's magnetopause and bow shock from MESSENGER Magnetometer observations , 2013 .

[40]  James A. Slavin,et al.  MESSENGER observations of a flux‐transfer‐event shower at Mercury , 2012 .

[41]  E. Möbius,et al.  Direct observation of He+ pick-up ions of interstellar origin in the solar wind , 1985, Nature.

[42]  S. Solomon,et al.  MESSENGER Mission Overview , 2007 .

[43]  A. Sprague,et al.  Modeling MESSENGER observations of calcium in Mercury's exosphere , 2012 .

[44]  C. Schmidt Mercury's sodium exosphere , 2013 .

[45]  A. Summers,et al.  Hydromagnetic flow around the magnetosphere , 1966 .

[46]  Kenneth G. Powell,et al.  Interaction of Mercury with the Solar Wind , 1998 .

[47]  J. Dungey Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones , 1961 .

[48]  Mehdi Benna,et al.  MESSENGER Observations of Extreme Loading and Unloading of Mercury’s Magnetic Tail , 2010, Science.

[49]  D. Baker,et al.  MESSENGER observations of the plasma environment near Mercury , 2009 .

[50]  B. Anderson,et al.  The Magnetometer Instrument on MESSENGER , 2007 .

[51]  M. Smith,et al.  Low and middle altitude cusp particle signatures for general magnetopause reconnection rate variations: 1. Theory , 1994 .

[52]  Barry H. Mauk,et al.  The Energetic Particle and Plasma Spectrometer Instrument on the MESSENGER Spacecraft , 2007 .

[53]  James A. Slavin,et al.  Sodium‐ion pickup observed above the magnetopause during MESSENGER's first Mercury flyby: Constraints on neutral exospheric models , 2009 .

[54]  Robert E. Johnson Plasma-induced sputtering of an atmosphere , 1994 .

[55]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  MESSENGER observations of magnetopause structure and dynamics at Mercury , 2013 .

[56]  S. Solomon,et al.  Plasma pressure in Mercury's equatorial magnetosphere derived from MESSENGER Magnetometer observations , 2011 .

[57]  M. Lockwood,et al.  The cleft ion fountain: A two‐dimensional kinetic model , 1985 .

[58]  Thomas E. Moore,et al.  A quantitative model of the planetary Na + contribution to Mercury’s magnetosphere , 2003 .

[59]  I. Papamastorakis,et al.  Evidence for magnetic field reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause , 1981 .

[60]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Mercury’s magnetospheric magnetic field after the first two MESSENGER flybys , 2010 .