Introduction: The United States has made recent large investments in creating data infrastructures to support the important goals of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) and comparative effectiveness research (CER), with still more investment planned. These initial investments, while critical to the creation of the infrastructures, are not expected to sustain them much beyond the initial development. To provide the maximum benefit, the infrastructures need to be sustained through innovative financing models while providing value to PCOR and CER researchers. Sustainability Factors: Based on our experience with creating flexible sustainability strategies (i.e., strategies that are adaptive to the different characteristics and opportunities of a resource or infrastructure), we define specific factors that are important considerations in developing a sustainability strategy. These factors include assets, expansion, complexity, and stakeholders. Each factor is described, with examples of how it is applied. These factors are dimensions of variation in different resources, to which a sustainability strategy should adapt. Summary Observations: We also identify specific important considerations for maintaining an infrastructure, so that the long-term intended benefits can be realized. These observations are presented as lessons learned, to be applied to other sustainability efforts. We define the lessons learned, relating them to the defined sustainability factors as interactions between factors. Conclusion and Next Steps: Using perspectives and experiences from a diverse group of experts, we define broad characteristics of sustainability strategies and important observations, which can vary for different projects. Other descriptions of adaptive, flexible, and successful models of collaboration between stakeholders and data infrastructures can expand this framework by identifying other factors for sustainability, and give more concrete directions on how sustainability can be best achieved.
[1]
Judah Thornewill,et al.
Information infrastructure for consumer health: a health information exchange stakeholder study.
,
2011,
American journal of preventive medicine.
[2]
Philip R. O. Payne,et al.
Biomedical Informatics and Outcomes Research: Enabling Knowledge-Driven Health Care
,
2009,
Circulation.
[3]
Michael Zouberakis,et al.
Models for financial sustainability of biological databases and resources
,
2009,
Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.
[4]
Beth Henry Johnson.
Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum building the infrastructure to conduct comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research using electronic clinical data.
,
2012,
Medical care.
[5]
Edm Forum.
Building the Electronic Clinical Data Infrastructure to Improve Patient Outcomes: CER Project Profiles
,
2012
.
[6]
D. Madigan,et al.
Empirical assessment of methods for risk identification in healthcare data: results from the experiments of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership
,
2012,
Statistics in medicine.
[7]
Maureen McKinney.
'Huge potential' for EHRs and comparative effectiveness.
,
2010,
Hospitals & health networks.
[8]
Erin Holve,et al.
The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) Forum for Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER)
,
2012,
Medical care.
[9]
D. Goldmann,et al.
The promise of comparative effectiveness research.
,
2011,
JAMA.