Level estimation, classification and probability distribution architectures for trading the EUR/USD exchange rate

Dunis and Williams (Derivatives: use, trading and regulation 8(3):211–239, 2002; Applied quantitative methods for trading and investment. Wiley, Chichester, 2003) have shown the superiority of a Multi-layer perceptron network (MLP), outperforming its benchmark models such as a moving average convergence divergence technical model (MACD), an autoregressive moving average model (ARMA) and a logistic regression model (LOGIT) on a Euro/Dollar (EUR/USD) time series. The motivation for this paper is to investigate the use of different neural network architectures. This is done by benchmarking three different neural network designs representing a level estimator, a classification model and a probability distribution predictor. More specifically, we present the Mulit-layer perceptron network, the Softmax cross entropy model and the Gaussian mixture model and benchmark their respective performance on the Euro/Dollar (EUR/USD) time series as reported by Dunis and Williams. As it turns out, the Multi-layer perceptron does best when used without confirmation filters and leverage, while the Softmax cross entropy model and the Gaussian mixture model outperforms the Multi-layer perceptron when using more sophisticated trading strategies and leverage. This might be due to the ability of both models using probability distributions to identify successfully trades with a high Sharpe ratio.

[1]  Jason Laws,et al.  Applied Quantitative Methods for Trading and Investment: Dunis/Trading and Investment , 2005 .

[2]  Christian L. Dunis,et al.  Applications of Advanced Regression Analysis for Trading and Investment , 2005 .

[3]  C. Bishop Mixture density networks , 1994 .

[4]  Milton S. Boyd,et al.  Designing a neural network for forecasting financial and economic time series , 1996, Neurocomputing.

[5]  Mark Williams,et al.  Modelling and Trading the EUR / USD Exchange Rate : Do Neural Network Models Perform Better ? , 2002 .

[6]  Ashok N. Srivastava,et al.  Predicting conditional probability distributions: a connectionist approach , 1995, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[7]  Dirk Husmeier,et al.  Neural networks for conditional probability estimation - forecasting beyond point predictions , 1999, Perspectives in neural computing.

[8]  Ralph Neuneier,et al.  Estimation of Conditional Densities: A Comparison of Neural Network Approaches , 1994 .

[9]  P. Lisboa,et al.  Business Applications of Neural Networks:The State-of-the-Art of Real-World Applications , 2000 .

[10]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts and the EM Algorithm , 1993, Neural Computation.

[11]  Arnold F. Shapiro,et al.  A Hitchhiker’s guide to the techniques of adaptive nonlinear models , 2000 .

[12]  Dirk Husmeier,et al.  Neural Networks for Conditional Probability Estimation , 1999, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[14]  Dirk Husmeier,et al.  Modelling Conditional Probability Densities with Neural Networks , 1997 .

[15]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[16]  Krzysztof Krawiec,et al.  Business Applications of Neural Networks: P.J.G. Lisboa, B. Edisbury, A. Vellido (Eds.); World Scientific, Singapore, 2000, 220 pages, ISBN 981-02-4089-9 , 2003, European Journal of Operational Research.

[17]  Yoh-Han Pao,et al.  Stochastic choice of basis functions in adaptive function approximation and the functional-link net , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[18]  Andreas S. Weigend,et al.  Predictions with Confidence Intervals ( Local Error Bars ) , 1994 .