Quantitative factors proposed to influence the prevalence of canine tick-borne disease agents in the United States

[1]  Robert B. Lund,et al.  Quantitative factors proposed to influence the prevalence of canine tick-borne disease agents in the United States , 2014, Parasites & Vectors.

[2]  Robert B. Lund,et al.  Factors influencing U.S. canine heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) prevalence , 2014, Parasites & Vectors.

[3]  D. Bowman,et al.  Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012 , 2014, Parasites & Vectors.

[4]  A. Hinckley,et al.  Elevated Lyme disease seroprevalence among dogs in a nonendemic county: harbinger or artifact? , 2013, Vector borne and zoonotic diseases.

[5]  Robert B. Lund,et al.  Key factors influencing canine heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, in the United States , 2012, Parasites & Vectors.

[6]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Impact of the experimental removal of lizards on Lyme disease risk , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  P. Mead,et al.  Canine serology as adjunct to human Lyme disease surveillance. , 2011, Emerging infectious diseases.

[8]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  Density of Ixodes scapularis Ticks on Monhegan Island after Complete Deer Removal: A Question of Avian Importation? , 2011, Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology.

[9]  D. Bowman,et al.  Prevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in the United States: results of a national clinic-based serologic survey. , 2009, Veterinary parasitology.