Pure quotation and general compositionality

Starting from the familiar observation that no straightforward treatment of pure quotation can be compositional in the standard (homomorphism) sense, we introduce general compositionality, which can be described as compositionality that takes linguistic context into account. A formal notion of linguistic context type is developed, allowing the context type of a complex expression to be distinct from those of its constituents. We formulate natural conditions under which an ordinary meaning assignment can be non-trivially extended to one that is sensitive to context types and satisfies general compositionality. As our main example we work out a Fregean treatment of pure quotation, but we also indicate that the method applies to other kinds of context, e.g. intensional contexts.

[1]  Kathrin Glüer,et al.  Relational Modality , 2008, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[2]  M. Black,et al.  Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege , 1953 .

[3]  Corey Washington,et al.  The Identity Theory of Quotation , 1992 .

[4]  David Kaplan Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals , 1989 .

[5]  Christopher Kennedy Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives , 2007 .

[6]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Words, Proofs and Diagrams , 2002 .

[7]  François Recanati,et al.  Composition Ality, Flexibility, And Context Dependence , 2012 .

[8]  F. Récanati OPEN QUOTATION REVISITED , 2008 .

[9]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[10]  S. Predelli The demonstrative theory of quotation , 2008 .

[11]  Dag Westerståhl,et al.  Compositionality II: Arguments and Problems , 2010 .

[12]  Leonard Linsky,et al.  Semantics and the Philosophy of Language , 1953 .

[13]  Dag Westerståhl,et al.  Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants , 2010 .

[14]  What do quotation marks name? Frege's theories of quotations and that-clauses , 1982 .

[15]  Joseph R. Shoenfield,et al.  Mathematical logic , 1967 .

[16]  D. Davidson Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation , 1984 .

[17]  Markus Werning,et al.  Right and Wrong Reasons for Compositionality , 2005 .

[18]  Chung-chieh Shan,et al.  The character of quotation , 2010 .

[19]  Herman Cappelen,et al.  Language Turned on Itself: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Metalinguistic Discourse , 2007 .

[20]  G. Frege Über Sinn und Bedeutung , 1892 .

[21]  Stig Kanger,et al.  Philosophy and Grammar , 1981 .

[22]  D. Westerståhl,et al.  On Mathematical Proofs of the Vacuity of Compositionality , 1998 .

[23]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[24]  Davis Lewis,et al.  INDEX, CONTEXT, AND CONTENT , 1980 .

[25]  Wilfrid Hodges,et al.  Formal Features of Compositionality , 2001, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[26]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Quotations as Demonstrations. , 1990 .

[27]  Peter Pagin,et al.  General Terms and Relational Modality , 2012 .

[28]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Compositionality in Formal Semantics , 2004 .

[29]  Paul Saka,et al.  Quotation and the Use-Mention Distinction , 1998 .

[30]  Howard K. Wettstein,et al.  Themes from Kaplan , 1989 .

[31]  Peter Pagin,et al.  Proper Names and Relational Modality , 2007 .

[32]  Dag Westerståhl,et al.  On the Compositional Extension Problem , 2004, J. Philos. Log..

[33]  I. Mackenzie The Semantic Conception of Truth , 1997 .