ALTRUISM VIA KIN‐SELECTION STRATEGIES THAT RELY ON ARBITRARY TAGS WITH WHICH THEY COEVOLVE

Abstract Hamilton's rule explains when natural selection will favor altruism between conspecifics, given their degree of relatedness. In practice, indicators of relatedness (such as scent) coevolve with strategies based on these indicators, a fact not included in previous theories of kin recognition. Using a combination of simulation modeling and mathematical extension of Hamilton's rule, we demonstrate how altruism can emerge and be sustained in a coevolutionary setting where relatedness depends on an individual's social environment and varies from one locus to another. The results support a very general expectation of widespread, and not necessarily weak, conditional altruism in nature.

[1]  Alan Grafen,et al.  A geometric view of relatedness , 1985 .

[2]  E. Keverne,et al.  Genetic imprinting: Urinary odour preferences in mice , 2001, Nature.

[3]  H. Reeve,et al.  The Evolution of Conspecific Acceptance Thresholds , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Ross A. Hammond,et al.  The Evolution of Ethnocentric Behavior , 2003 .

[5]  G. B. Pollock,et al.  Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[6]  A. Grafen.  Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  R. Grosberg,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SELECTIVE AGGRESSION CONDITIONED ON ALLORECOGNITION SPECIFICITY , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  D. Haig,et al.  Gestational drive and the green-bearded placenta. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  G. B. Pollock.  Evolutionary stability of reciprocity in a viscous lattice , 1989 .

[10]  R. Riolo,et al.  Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity , 2001, Nature.

[11]  R. Crozier.  GENETIC CLONAL RECOGNITION ABILITIES IN MARINE INVERTEBRATES MUST BE MAINTAINED BY SELECTION FOR SOMETHING ELSE , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  SOCIALLY MEDIATED SPECIATION , 2003 .

[13]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  F. Ratnieks.  The Evolution of Genetic Odor-Cue Diversity in Social Hymenoptera , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[15]  P D Taylor,et al.  OVERLAPPING GENERATIONS CAN PROMOTE ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  David E. Kaun,et al.  Marketing Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. , 1974 .

[17]  Sherman,et al.  The armpit effect in hamster kin recognition. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  P. Sherman,et al.  Self-referent phenotype matching in a brood parasite: the armpit effect in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[19]  R. Dawkins.  The Extended Phenotype , 1982 .

[20]  George R. Price,et al.  Selection and Covariance , 1970, Nature.

[21]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  Altruism, Dispersal, and Phenotype‐Matching Kin Recognition , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[22]  P. Taylor.  Altruism in viscous populations — an inclusive fitness model , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[23]  A. Agrawal.  Kin recognition and the evolution of altruism , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  M N,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in a Lattice-Structured Population , 1996 .

[25]  A. Grafen.  Evolutionary biology: Green beard as death warrant , 1998, Nature.

[26]  D. Wilson,et al.  Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  L. Keller,et al.  Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant , 1998, Nature.

[28]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[29]  P. Sherman,et al.  Kin Recognition by Phenotype Matching , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[30]  D. Queller,et al.  A GENERAL MODEL FOR KIN SELECTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  J. Mateo,et al.  Kin recognition and the ‘armpit effect’: evidence of self–referent phenotype matching , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and Competition Between Relatives , 2002, Science.

[33]  T. Getty.  Dear Enemies and the Prisoner's Dilemma: Why Should Territorial Neighbors Form Defensive Coalitions? , 1987 .

[34]  A. Grafen.  Do animals really recognize kin? , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Brief communications , 1927, Annals of surgery.

[36]  Barry Sinervo,et al.  SOCIALLY MEDIATED SPECIATION , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.