Nutrient dynamics of the southern and northern BOREAS boreal forests

Abstract The objective of this study was to compare nutrient concentration, distribution, and select components of nutrient budgets for aspen (Populus tremuloides), jack pine (Pinus banksiana), and black spruce (Picea mariana) forest ecosystems at the BOReal Ecosystem Atmosphere Study (BOREAS), southern and northern study areas near Candle Lake, Saskatchewan and Thompson, Manitoba, Canada, respectively. The vegetation (excluding fine roots and understory) in the aspen, black spruce, and jack pine stands contained 70-79%, 53-54%, and 58-67% of total ecosystem carbon content, respectively. Soil (forest floor and mineral soil) nitrogen (N), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) content comprised over 90% of the total ecosystem nutrient content, except for Ca and Mg content of the southern black spruce stand and Ca content of the southern aspen stand which were less than 90%. Annual litterfall N content was significantly greater (p < 0.05) for trembling aspen (30-41 kg N ha-1 yr-1) than for jack pine (5-10 kg N ha-1 yr-1) or black spruce (6-7 kg N ha-1 yr-1), and was generally greater, but not significantly, for the southern than for the northern study area. Aboveground net primary production was positively correlated (R2 = 0.91) to annual litterfall N content for the BOREAS forests, and for all boreal forests (R2 = 0.57). Annual aboveground nutrient (N, Ca, Mg, and K) requirements (sum of the annual increment of nutrient in foliage, branches, and stems) were significantly greater (p < 0.05) for trembling aspen than for jack pine or black spruce forests. Annual aboveground N requirements ranged from 37-53, 6-14, and 6-7 kg N ha-1 yr-1 for trembling aspen, jack pine, and black spruce forests, respectively. The greater nutrient requirements of deciduous than evergreen boreal forests was explained by a greater annual production of biomass and lower use efficiency of nutrients. Nutrient cycling characteristics of boreal forests were influenced by climate and forest type, with the latter having a greater influence on litterfall N, annual nutrient requirements, nutrient mean residence time, and nutrient distribution.

[1]  F. Hall,et al.  BOREAS TE-1 SSA Soil Lab Data , 2000 .

[2]  Karin S. Fassnacht,et al.  Comparison of the litterfall and forest floor organic matter and nitrogen dynamics of upland forest ecosystems in north central Wisconsin , 1999 .

[3]  S. Linder,et al.  Effects of soil warming during spring on photosynthetic recovery in boreal Norway spruce stands , 1999 .

[4]  Karin S. Fassnacht,et al.  Comparison of the litterfall and forest floor organic matter and nitrogen dynamics of upland forest ecosystems in north central Wisconsin , 1999 .

[5]  S. Gower,et al.  Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics of Boreal Jack Pine Stands With and Without a Green Alder Understory , 1998, Ecosystems.

[6]  John M. Norman,et al.  Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada , 1997 .

[7]  John Moncrieff,et al.  Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a boreal black spruce forest , 1997 .

[8]  G. Collatz,et al.  Profiles of photosynthetically active radiation, nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity in the boreal forest: Implications for scaling from leaf to canopy , 1997 .

[9]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Physiological responses of a black spruce forest to weather , 1997 .

[10]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions , 1997 .

[11]  H. Gholz Applications of Physiological Ecology to Forest Management , 1997 .

[12]  John M. Norman,et al.  Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. , 1997, Tree physiology.

[13]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  NITROGEN MINERALIZATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN 50 HARDWOOD AND CONIFER STANDS ON DIVERSE SOILS , 1997 .

[14]  J. Landsberg 10 – Applications of Modern Technology and Ecophysiology to Forest Management , 1997 .

[15]  R. Ruess,et al.  Contributions of fine root production and turnover to the carbon and nitrogen cycling in taiga forests of the Alaskan interior , 1996 .

[16]  P. Reich,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Variation in Conifer Leaf Life-Span , 1995 .

[17]  R. Tate Nitrogen in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Questions of Productivity, Vegetational Changes, and Ecosystem Stability , 1992 .

[18]  S. Gower,et al.  Aboveground nitrogen and phosphorus use by five plantation-grown trees with different leaf longevities , 1991 .

[19]  Leslie A. Viereck,et al.  ELEMENT CYCLING IN TAIGA FORESTS : STATE-FACTOR CONTROL , 1991 .

[20]  Leena Finér,et al.  Biomass and nutrient cycle in fertilized and unfertilized pine, mixed birch and pine and spruce stands on a drained mire. , 1989 .

[21]  John Pastor,et al.  Aboveground Production and N and P Cycling Along a Nitrogen Mineralization Gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin , 1984 .

[22]  Leslie A. Viereck,et al.  Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems , 1983 .

[23]  K. Cleve,et al.  Nutrient cycling in relation to decomposition and organic-matter quality in taiga ecosystems , 1983 .

[24]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Seasonal Changes in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fractions and Autumn Retranslocation in Evergreen and Deciduous Taiga Trees , 1983 .

[25]  P. Vitousek,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Potential Nitrification and Nitrate Mobility in Forest Ecosystems , 1982 .

[26]  A. Page Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. , 1982 .

[27]  H. Jenny,et al.  The Soil Resource , 1982, Ecological Studies.

[28]  I. Morrison,et al.  DISTRIBUTION AND CYCLING OF NUTRIENTS IN A NATURAL PINUS BANKSIANA ECOSYSTEM , 1976 .

[29]  S. E. Allen,et al.  A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material , 1975 .