Computational analysis of the relationship between allergenicity and digestibility of allergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid

BackgroundSafety assessment of genetically modified (GM) food, with regard to allergenic potential of transgene-encoded xenoproteins, typically involves several different methods, evaluation by digestibility being one thereof. However, there are still debates about whether the allergenicity of food allergens is related to their resistance to digestion by the gastric fluid. The disagreements may in part stem from classification of allergens only by their sources, which we believe is inadequate, and the difficulties in achieving identical experimental conditions for studying digestion by simulated gastric fluid (SGF) so that results can be compared. Here, we reclassify allergenic food allergens into alimentary canal-sensitized (ACS) and non-alimentary canal-sensitized (NACS) allergens and use a computational model that simulates gastric fluid digestion to analyze the digestibilities of these two types.ResultsThe model presented in this paper is as effective as SGF digestion experiments, but more stable and reproducible. On the basis of this model, food allergens are satisfactorily classified as ACS and NACS types by their pathways for sensitization; the former are relatively resistant to gastric fluid digestion while the later are relatively labile.ConclusionThe results suggest that it is better to classify allergens into ACS and NACS types when understanding the relationship between their digestibility and allergenicity and the digestibility of a target foreign protein is a parameter for evaluating its allergenicity during safety assessments of GM food.

[1]  K. Hoffmann‐Sommergruber,et al.  Linkage map positions and allelic diversity of two Mal d 3 (non-specific lipid transfer protein) genes in the cultivated apple (Malus domestica) , 2005, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[2]  H. Sampson,et al.  Prevalence of seafood allergy in the United States determined by a random telephone survey. , 2004, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  T. Fu,et al.  Digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluid-a comparative study. , 2003, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[4]  R. Van Ree,et al.  Ara h 8, a Bet v 1-homologous allergen from peanut, is a major allergen in patients with combined birch pollen and peanut allergy. , 2004, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[5]  A. Fiandor,et al.  Detection, isolation and complete amino acid sequence of an aeroallergenic protein from rapeseed flour , 1997, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[6]  Á. Valdez-Ortiz,et al.  Safety assessment by in vitro digestibility and allergenicity of genetically modified maize with an amaranth 11S globulin. , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[7]  W. Becker,et al.  Isolation and characterization of natural Ara h 6: evidence for a further peanut allergen with putative clinical relevance based on resistance to pepsin digestion and heat. , 2004, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[8]  K. Hoffmann‐Sommergruber,et al.  Cloning and Molecular and Immunological Characterisation of Two New Food Allergens, Cap a 2 and Lyc e 1, Profilins from Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum) and Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) , 2003, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[9]  H. Breiteneder,et al.  Plant food allergens--structural and functional aspects of allergenicity. , 2005, Biotechnology advances.

[10]  T. Fu.  Digestion Stability as a Criterion for Protein Allergenicity Assessment , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Valenta,et al.  Recombinant Carp Parvalbumin, the Major Cross-Reactive Fish Allergen: A Tool for Diagnosis and Therapy of Fish Allergy1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  N. Aoki,et al.  A 33-kDa Allergen from Rice (Oryza sativa L.Japonica) , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Z. Ikezawa,et al.  Digestibility of allergens extracted from natural rubber latex and vegetable foods. , 2000, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[14]  Werner Braun,et al.  Structural Database of Allergenic Proteins (SDAP) , 2006 .

[15]  Roy L. Fuchs,et al.  Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  R. Van Ree,et al.  Lipid Transfer Protein: A Pan-Allergen in Plant-Derived Foods That Is Highly Resistant to Pepsin Digestion , 2000, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[17]  S. Scheurer,et al.  Cross-reactivity within the profilin panallergen family investigated by comparison of recombinant profilins from pear (Pyr c 4), cherry (Pru av 4) and celery (Api g 4) with birch pollen profilin Bet v 2. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[18]  I. Moneo,et al.  Isolation and characterization of a major allergen from the fish parasite Anisakis simplex. , 2000, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[19]  Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber,et al.  Characterization of Api g 1.0201, a New Member of the Api g 1 Family of Celery Allergens , 2000, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[20]  Ron D. Appel,et al.  ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  S. Vieths,et al.  Digestibility of peanut and hazelnut allergens investigated by a simple in vitro procedure , 1999 .

[22]  Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber,et al.  Cross‐reactive N‐glycans of Api g 5, a high molecular weight glycoprotein allergen from celery, are required for immunoglobulin E binding and activation of effector cells from allergic patients , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  Werner Braun,et al.  SDAP: database and computational tools for allergenic proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Ni Ting.  Standardization of Allergenicity Assessment of Transgenic Products , 2002 .

[25]  Scheurer,et al.  Cloning of the minor allergen Api g 4 profilin from celery (Apium graveolens) and its cross‐reactivity with birch pollen profilin Bet v 2 , 2000, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[26]  P. Neudecker,et al.  Mutational epitope analysis of Pru av 1 and Api g 1, the major allergens of cherry (Prunus avium) and celery (Apium graveolens): correlating IgE reactivity with three-dimensional structure. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[27]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..

[28]  R. Van Ree,et al.  Lipid Transfer Protein: A Pan-Allergen in Plant-Derived Foods That Is Highly Resistant to Pepsin Digestion , 2001, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[29]  A. Burks,et al.  Protein Structure Plays a Critical Role in Peanut Allergen Stability and May Determine Immunodominant IgE-Binding Epitopes , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  C. Galán,et al.  Effects of sampling height and climatic conditions in aerobiological studies. , 1999, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[31]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Allergenicity assessment of transgenic mustard (Brassica juncea) expressing bacterial codA gene , 2006, Allergy.