Members of Transgressor Groups Prefer Reparations to Come From Third Parties

Abstract. Interpersonal research has shown that guilt motivates perpetrators to compensate victims at the expense of a third party, indicating that the emotion’s goal involves reparative outcomes rather than self-mortification. However, this motivation has yet to be tested in an intergroup context. Based on findings about ingroup wrongdoing, compensation was expected to draw primarily on shame rather than guilt. Three experiments (total N = 617) showed that participants only allocated more to the victims versus their own group when compensation was assigned from a third party’s rather than their own group’s resources. There was also evidence that shame was felt, and related to compensating victims, more strongly than guilt, whether at the expense of the ingroup or the third party.

[1]  Melissa de Vel-Palumbo,et al.  Why do we self‐punish? Perceptions of the motives and impact of self‐punishment outside the laboratory , 2018 .

[2]  B. Lickel,et al.  The benefits of collective responsibility: How ingroup reputation concern motivates prosociality in intergroup contexts , 2018, European Journal of Social Psychology.

[3]  C. Leach,et al.  Seeking revenge or seeking reconciliation? How concern for social‐image and felt shame helps explain responses in reciprocal intergroup conflict , 2018 .

[4]  Silvia Krauth‐Gruber,et al.  Guilt norms regarding historical violence and implications for intergroup relations in France , 2018 .

[5]  Jaclyn M. Moloney,et al.  Perpetrators’ reactions to perceived interpersonal wrongdoing: The associations of guilt and shame with forgiving, punishing, and excusing oneself , 2016 .

[6]  C. Leach,et al.  When is shame linked to constructive approach orientation? A meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Stephen Reysen,et al.  Socio-structural intergroup characteristics and group-based emotions in three countries , 2014 .

[8]  Hongbo Yu,et al.  The voice of conscience: neural bases of interpersonal guilt and compensation. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[9]  Sana Sheikh.  Cultural Variations in Shame’s Responses , 2014, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[10]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Two Faces of Group-Based Shame , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  A. Manstead,et al.  The self-regulatory role of anticipated group-based shame and guilt in inhibiting in-group favoritism , 2013 .

[12]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Reappraising the Moral Nature of Emotions in Decision Making: The Case of Shame and Guilt , 2013 .

[13]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Nie Wieder: Group-Based Emotions for In-Group Wrongdoing Affect Attitudes toward Unrelated Minorities , 2013 .

[14]  R. Giner-Sorolla,et al.  Reconciliation responses, blame, and expressions of guilt or shame , 2013 .

[15]  Russell Spears,et al.  ‘This will bring shame on our nation’: The role of anticipated group-based emotions on collective action , 2011, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[16]  A. Panter,et al.  Guilt Proneness and Moral Character , 2012 .

[17]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Shame and Guilt—Do They Really Differ in Their Focus of Evaluation? Wanting to Change the Self and Behavior in Response to Ingroup Immorality , 2012, The Journal of social psychology.

[19]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  What is moral about guilt? Acting "prosocially" at the disadvantage of others. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Restore and protect motivations following shame , 2010 .

[21]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  The role of interpersonal harm in distinguishing regret from guilt. , 2008, Emotion.

[22]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Not so ugly after all: when shame acts as a commitment device. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Dealing with the past and facing the future: mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina , 2008 .

[24]  R. Giner-Sorolla,et al.  Shame Expressions Reduce the Recipient’s Insult from Outgroup Reparations , 2008 .

[25]  Roberto González,et al.  Nuestra culpa: collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt , 2007 .

[27]  J. Rivera,et al.  The Emotional Climate of Nations and Their Culture of Peace , 2007 .

[28]  B. Lickel,et al.  Why Individuals Protest the Perceived Transgressions of Their Country , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  Rob M. A. Nelissen,et al.  How to turn a hawk into a dove and vice versa: Interactions between emotions and goals in a give-some dilemma game , 2007 .

[30]  Michael Johns,et al.  Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11 , 2005 .

[31]  Toni Schmader,et al.  Vicarious Shame and Guilt , 2005 .

[32]  A. Manstead,et al.  Guilty by Association: When One's Group Has a Negative History , 1998 .

[33]  F. W. Wicker,et al.  Participant descriptions of guilt and shame , 1983 .

[34]  D. T. Regan,et al.  Voluntary expiation of guilt: a field experiment. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.