The Problematic Metagovernance of Networks: Water Reform in New South Wales

This paper argues that we need to bring government back into discussions about network governance, via the concept of metagovernance which uses water reform in an Australian state as an example. Metagovernance is defined as the government of governance, and is a vital but under researched and under theorised problem because it is difficult and contentious. The paper identifies a range of metagovernance failures in this case and suggests that the lessons learnt by the Australian authorities from the experience have led to some rethinking about the benefits and desirable scope of network governance.

[1]  Lawrence C. Walters,et al.  Putting More Public in Policy Analysis , 2000 .

[2]  M. Keating.  Who Rules? How Government Retains Control of a Privatised Economy , 2004 .

[3]  Alan Randall,et al.  PROPERTY ENTITLEMENTS AND PRICING POLICIES FOR A MATURING WATER ECONOMY , 1981 .

[4]  B. Head.  Participation or co-governance?: Challenges for regional natural resource management , 2005 .

[5]  S. Bell.  How tight are the policy constraints? The policy convergence thesis, institutionally situated actors and expansionary monetary policy in Australia , 2005 .

[6]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  New challenges to governance theory , 1998 .

[7]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[8]  R. Curtain.  What role for citizens in developing and implementing public policy? [Series of two parts]: Part 1. Presented as a keynote address to the National Institute for Governance. Conference (2003: Canberra).] , 2003 .

[9]  F. Mott.  Water in Australia , 1881, Nature.

[10]  Dw Adams,et al.  Knowing and skilling in contemporary public administration , 2002 .

[11]  J. Allan,et al.  Managing Water for the Environment: Impediments and Challenges , 1997 .

[12]  M. Whitehead.  ‘In the shadow of hierarchy’: meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands , 2003 .

[13]  W. Form,et al.  Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. , 1996 .

[14]  Per Kågeson,et al.  The Concept of Sustainable Development , 1998 .

[15]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony. , 2003 .

[16]  Bob Jessop,et al.  The governance of complexity and the complexity of governance , 2005, Putting Civil Society in Its Place.

[17]  M. Munasinghe,et al.  Defining and Measuring Sustainability: The Biogeophysical Foundations , 1995 .

[18]  S. Bell.  ‘Appropriate’ Policy Knowledge, and Institutional and Governance Implications , 2004 .

[19]  M. Marinetto,et al.  Governing beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School , 2003 .

[20]  I. Holliday.  Is the British State Hollowing Out , 2000 .

[21]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme? , 2002 .

[22]  K. Kernaghan.  Partnership and public administration: conceptual and practical considerations , 1993 .

[23]  J. Quiggin.  Environmental economics and the Murray-Darling river system , 2001 .

[24]  Dw Adams,et al.  Community in Public Policy: Fad or Foundation? , 2001 .

[25]  A. Hindmoor.  The Importance of Being Trusted: Transaction Costs and Policy Network Theory , 1998 .

[26]  Bruce G. Carruthers,et al.  The Myth of the Powerless State , 1998 .

[27]  B. Jessop.  The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development , 1998 .

[28]  F. Dyer,et al.  Snapshot of the Murray- Darling Basin River Condition , 2001 .

[29]  R. Grafton,et al.  A critical analysis of the National Water Initiative , 2005 .

[30]  Dw Adams,et al.  Usable knowledge in public policy , 2004 .