Studying the vertical aerosol extinction coefficient by comparing in situ airborne data and elastic backscatter lidar

Abstract. Vertical profiles of aerosol particle optical properties were explored in a case study near the San Pietro Capofiume (SPC) ground station during the PEGASOS Po Valley campaign in the summer of 2012. A Zeppelin NT airship was employed to investigate the effect of the dynamics of the planetary boundary layer at altitudes between ∼  50 and 800 m above ground. Determined properties included the aerosol particle size distribution, the hygroscopic growth factor, the effective index of refraction and the light absorption coefficient. The first three parameters were used to retrieve the light scattering coefficient. Simultaneously, direct measurements of both the scattering and absorption coefficient were carried out at the SPC ground station. Additionally, a single wavelength polarization diversity elastic lidar system provided estimates of aerosol extinction coefficients using the Klett method to accomplish the inversion of the signal, for a vertically resolved comparison between in situ and remote-sensing results. Note, however, that the comparison was for the most part done in the altitude range where the overlap function is incomplete and accordingly uncertainties are larger. First, the airborne results at low altitudes were validated with the ground measurements. Agreement within approximately ±25 and ±20 % was found for the dry scattering and absorption coefficient, respectively. The single scattering albedo, ranged between 0.83 and 0.95, indicating the importance of the absorbing particles in the Po Valley region. A clear layering of the atmosphere was observed during the beginning of the flight (until ∼  10:00 LT – local time) before the mixing layer (ML) was fully developed. Highest extinction coefficients were found at low altitudes, in the new ML, while values in the residual layer, which could be probed at the beginning of the flight at elevated altitudes, were lower. At the end of the flight (after ∼  12:00 LT) the ML was fully developed, resulting in constant extinction coefficients at all altitudes measured on the Zeppelin NT. Lidar estimates captured these dynamic features well and good agreement was found for the extinction coefficients compared to the in situ results, using fixed lidar ratios (LR) between 30 and 70 sr for the altitudes probed with the Zeppelin. These LR are consistent with values for continental aerosol particles that can be expected in this region.

[1]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Adsorptive uptake of water by semisolid secondary organic aerosols , 2015 .

[2]  B. Rosati,et al.  Vertical profiling of aerosol hygroscopic properties in the planetary boundary layer during the PEGASOS campaigns , 2015 .

[3]  M. Facchini,et al.  Measurements of the aerosol chemical composition and mixing state in the Po Valley using multiple spectroscopic techniques , 2014 .

[4]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Long-term trends in aerosol optical characteristics in the Po Valley, Italy , 2014 .

[5]  P. Zieger,et al.  The white-light humidified optical particle spectrometer (WHOPS) - a novel airborne system to characterize aerosol hygroscopicity , 2014 .

[6]  P. Seifert,et al.  The Pagami Creek smoke plume after long-range transport to the upper troposphere over Europe – aerosol properties and black carbon mixing state , 2013 .

[7]  S. Decesari,et al.  Hygroscopic and chemical characterisation of Po Valley aerosol , 2013 .

[8]  D. Winker,et al.  Vertical profiles of aerosol optical properties over central Illinois and comparison with surface and satellite measurements , 2012 .

[9]  M. Facchini,et al.  Chemical characterization of springtime submicrometer aerosol in Po Valley, Italy , 2012 .

[10]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon , 2012, Science.

[11]  Thomas Ruhtz,et al.  Spatial variation of aerosol optical properties around the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.) , 2012 .

[12]  F. Cairo,et al.  The RAMNI airborne lidar for cloud and aerosol research , 2012 .

[13]  Angelo Riccio,et al.  Automatic detection of atmospheric boundary layer height using ceilometer backscatter data assisted by a boundary layer model , 2012 .

[14]  P. Zieger,et al.  Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites , 2012 .

[15]  L. Sauvage,et al.  Evaluation of Mixing-Height Retrievals from Automatic Profiling Lidars and Ceilometers in View of Future Integrated Networks in Europe , 2012, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[16]  Gionata Biavati,et al.  Correction scheme for close-range lidar returns. , 2011, Applied optics.

[17]  Chunsheng Zhao,et al.  Mobility particle size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions , 2010 .

[18]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Comparison of ambient aerosol extinction coefficients obtained from in-situ, MAX-DOAS and LIDAR measurements at Cabauw , 2010 .

[19]  P. Formenti,et al.  The AMMA MULID network for aerosol characterization in West Africa , 2010, 1011.3655.

[20]  W. Arnott,et al.  Absorption Ångström coefficient, brown carbon, and aerosols: basic concepts, bulk matter, and spherical particles , 2010 .

[21]  Vito Vitale,et al.  Columnar aerosol optical properties in the Po Valley, Italy, from MFRSR data , 2010 .

[22]  M. Esselborn,et al.  Enhancement of the aerosol direct radiative effect by semi-volatile aerosol components: airborne measurements in North-Western Europe , 2010 .

[23]  Martin Gysel,et al.  Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering in the Arctic , 2010 .

[24]  J. Pichon,et al.  Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops , 2010 .

[25]  G. Gobbi,et al.  Study of atmospheric aerosols and mixing layer by LIDAR. , 2009, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[26]  D. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm , 2009 .

[27]  P. Zieger,et al.  Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch , 2009 .

[28]  P. Zieger,et al.  Measurement of relative humidity dependent light scattering of aerosols , 2009 .

[29]  Benjamin J. Mullins,et al.  Performance evaluation of three optical particle counters with an efficient “multimodal” calibration method , 2008 .

[30]  M. Petters,et al.  A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity – Part 2: Including solubility , 2008 .

[31]  U. Baltensperger,et al.  Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments—a review , 2008 .

[32]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar , 2007 .

[33]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Application of the SKYRAD Improved Langley plot method for the in situ calibration of CIMEL Sun-sky photometers. , 2007, Applied optics.

[34]  T. Bond,et al.  Limitations in the enhancement of visible light absorption due to mixing state , 2006 .

[35]  M. Petters,et al.  A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity , 2006 .

[36]  M. R. Perrone,et al.  Height and seasonal dependence of aerosol optical properties over southeast Italy , 2006 .

[37]  Ernest Weingartner,et al.  Effect of humidity on aerosol light absorption and its implications for extinction and the single scattering albedo illustrated for a site in the lower free troposphere , 2005 .

[38]  W. Eichinger,et al.  Backscatter‐to‐Extinction Ratio , 2005 .

[39]  W. Patrick Arnott,et al.  Evaluation of Multiangle Absorption Photometry for Measuring Aerosol Light Absorption , 2005 .

[40]  Gian Paolo Gobbi,et al.  Modeling the Aerosol Extinction versus Backscatter Relationship for Lidar Applications: Maritime and Continental Conditions , 2004 .

[41]  M. Schnaiter,et al.  Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers , 2003 .

[42]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Optical closure for an aerosol column: Method, accuracy, and inferable properties applied to a biomass‐burning aerosol and its radiative forcing , 2002 .

[43]  B. Holben,et al.  Single-Scattering Albedo and Radiative Forcing of Various Aerosol Species with a Global Three-Dimensional Model , 2002 .

[44]  L. Brasseur,et al.  Raman lidar measurements of the aerosol extinction‐to‐backscatter ratio over the Southern Great Plains , 2001 .

[45]  H. Okamoto,et al.  Application of lidar depolarization measurement in the atmospheric boundary layer: Effects of dust and sea‐salt particles , 1999 .

[46]  Robert J. Charlson,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer , 1996 .

[47]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[48]  P. Barber Absorption and scattering of light by small particles , 1984 .

[49]  K. Sassen,et al.  Lidar crossover function and misalignment effects. , 1982, Applied optics.

[50]  J. Klett Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns. , 1981, Applied optics.

[51]  M. McCormick,et al.  Methodology for error analysis and simulation of lidar aerosol measurements. , 1979, Applied optics.

[52]  R. Stouffer,et al.  World Meteorological Organization , 1954, International Organization.

[53]  B. Rosati,et al.  Comparison of vertical aerosol extinction coefficients , 2015 .

[54]  G. Pisani Optical characterization of tropospheric aerosols in theurban area of Naples , 2006 .

[55]  G. Mie Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen , 1908 .