Classifying Criminal Charges in Chinese for Web-Based Legal Services

Along with the increasing accessibility of the Web, services available on the Web have expanded into several aspects of our lives. As a relatively new comer, Web-based legal services have become another front in the arena. For instance, through such services, people obtain rough pictures of the lawsuits of interest before they decide whether and how to approach their counselors. As a step toward offering online legal services, we propose algorithms for classifying criminal charges in Chinese based on the alleged criminal violations that the district attorney used to prosecute the defendants. The classification is not trivial because some prosecutions involve violations of multiple articles in the criminal law, and we wish to classify lawsuits as precisely as possible. We employ techniques of instance-based classification and introspective learning for the classification task, and achieve satisfactory initial results for classifying charges of larceny and gambling.

[1]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[2]  Chao-Lin Liu,et al.  Classification and clustering for case-based criminal summary judgments , 2003, ICAIL.

[3]  Graham Brown CHINATAX: exploring isomorphism with chinese law , 1993, ICAIL '93.

[4]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[5]  Paul Thompson Automatic categorization of case law , 2001, ICAIL '01.

[6]  Chao-Lin Liu,et al.  Case Instance Generation and Refinement for Case-Based Criminal Summary Judgments in Chinese , 2004, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[7]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Feature Weight Maintenance in Case Bases Using Introspective Learning , 2001, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[8]  Anandeep Pannu,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to inductively reason with cases in the legal domain , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[9]  Chao-Lin Liu,et al.  Some Case-Refinement Strategies for Case-Based Criminal Summary Judgments , 2003, ISMIS.

[10]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods , 2001, ICAIL '01.

[11]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: teleological, temporal, and procedural , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[12]  Changning Huang,et al.  Dependency-based Syntactic Analysis of Chinese and Annotation of Parsed Corpus , 2000, ACL.

[13]  Shusaku Tsumoto,et al.  Foundations of Intelligent Systems, 15th International Symposium, ISMIS 2005, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA, May 25-28, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, ISMIS.