Using monte carlo simulation in life cycle assessment for electric and internal combustion vehicles

Abstract1 BackgroundThe U.S. Government has encouraged shifting from internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) to alternatively fueled vehicles such as electric vehicles (EVs) for three primary reasons: reducing oil dependence, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and reducing Clean Air Act criteria pollutant emissions. In comparing these vehicles, there is uncertainty and variability in emission factors and performance variables, which cause wide variation in reported outputs.2 ObjectivesA model was developed to demonstrate the use of Monte Carlo simulation to predict life cycle emissions and energy consumption differences between the ICEV versus the EV on a per kilometer (km) traveled basis. Three EV technologies are considered: lead-acid, nickel-cadmium, and nickel metal hydride batteries.3 MethodsVariables were identified to build life cycle inventories between the EVs and ICEV. Distributions were selected for each of the variables and input to Monte Carlo Simulation soft-ware called Crystal Ball 2000®.4 Results and DiscussionAll three EV options reduce U.S. oil dependence by shifting to domestic coal. The life cycle energy consumption per kilometer (km) driven for the EVs is comparable to the ICEV; however, there is wide variation in predicted energy values. The model predicts that all three EV technologies will likely increase oxides of sulfur and nitrogen as well as particulate matter emissions on a per km driven basis. The model shows a high probability that volatile organic compounds and carbon monoxide emissions are reduced with the use of EVs. Lead emissions are also predicted to increase for lead-acid battery EVs. The EV will not reduce greenhouse gas emissions substantially and may even increase them based on the current U.S. reliance on coal for electricity generation. The EV may benefit public health by relocating air pollutants from urban centers, where traffic is concentrated, to rural areas where electricity generation and mining generally occur. The use of Monte Carlo simulation in life cycle analysis is demonstrated to be an effective tool to provide further insight on the likelihood of emission outputs and energy consumption.

[1]  R C Stempel,et al.  Electric Cars and Lead , 1995, Science.

[2]  B. Clinton,et al.  Executive Order 13149: Greening the Government Through Federal Fleet and Transportation Efficiency, April 21, 2000 , 2000 .

[3]  Jonathan G. Overly,et al.  Preliminary life-cycle assessment results for the design for the environment Computer Display Project , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.00CH37082).

[4]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Analysis for Automobiles , 1995 .

[5]  G. Bishop,et al.  On-road vehicle emissions: regulations, costs, and benefits. , 1995, Science.

[6]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  BATTERY-POWERED VEHICLES: OZONE REDUCTION VERSUS LEAD DISCHARGES , 1996 .

[7]  Steven Pomper,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory of a Generic U.S. Family Sedan Overview of Results USCAR AMP Project , 1998 .

[8]  P.P.A.A.H. Kandelaars,et al.  An analysis of variables influencing the material composition of automobiles , 1998 .

[9]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Impacts of Electric Vehicles on Primary Energy Consumption and Petroleum Displacement , 1991 .

[10]  B Finley,et al.  The benefits of probabilistic exposure assessment: three case studies involving contaminated air, water, and soil. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Thomas Gloria,et al.  Life‐cycle assessment: A survey of current implementation , 1995 .

[12]  A. Finkel,et al.  Toward less misleading comparisons of uncertain risks: the example of aflatoxin and alar. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  G. Bishop,et al.  Automobile emissions are statistically gamma distributed. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  L. Lave,et al.  Peer Reviewed: A Life-Cycle Model of an Automobile , 1998 .

[15]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Carbon dioxide emission rates for conventional and synthetic fuels , 1983 .

[16]  C. Hendrickson,et al.  Environmentail iplications of electric cars. , 1995, Science.

[17]  Frank Stodolsky,et al.  Life-Cycle Energy Savings Potential from Aluminum-Intensive Vehicles by , 2002 .

[18]  Bill Clinton Executive Order 13031: Federal Alternative Fueled Vehicle Leadership , 1996 .

[19]  N S Erlbaum IMPROVING AIR QUALITY MODELS IN NEW YORK STATE: UTILITY OF THE 1995 NATIONWIDE PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY , 2001 .