Patterns of Arm Muscle Activation Involved in Octopus Reaching Movements

The extreme flexibility of the octopus arm allows it to perform many different movements, yet octopuses reach toward a target in a stereotyped manner using a basic invariant motor structure: a bend traveling from the base of the arm toward the tip (Gutfreund et al., 1996a). To study the neuronal control of these movements, arm muscle activation [electromyogram (EMG)] was measured together with the kinematics of reaching movements. The traveling bend is associated with a propagating wave of muscle activation, with maximal muscle activation slightly preceding the traveling bend. Tonic activation was occasionally maintained afterward. Correlation of the EMG signals with the kinematic variables (velocities and accelerations) reveals that a significant part of the kinematic variability can be explained by the level of muscle activation. Furthermore, the EMG level measured during the initial stages of movement predicts the peak velocity attained toward the end of the reaching movement. These results suggest that feed-forward motor commands play an important role in the control of movement velocity and that simple adjustment of the excitation levels at the initial stages of the movement can set the velocity profile of the whole movement. A simple model of octopus arm extension is proposed in which the driving force is set initially and is then decreased in proportion to arm diameter at the bend. The model qualitatively reproduces the typical velocity profiles of octopus reaching movements, suggesting a simple control mechanism for bend propagation in the octopus arm.

[1]  M. Wells,et al.  The Function of the Brain of Octopus in Tactile Discrimination , 1957 .

[2]  J. Young The diameters of the fibres of the peripheral nerves of Octopus , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  C. Rowell Activity of interneurones in the arm of Octopus in response to tactile stimulation. , 1966, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  T. Golab,et al.  Localization of the immunoglobulin factors Gm(a), Gm(b) and Gm(x) in lymphoid tissue obtained from an individual of Gm ax/ab genotype. , 1966, The Australian journal of experimental biology and medical science.

[5]  J. Young The anatomy of the nervous system of Octopus vulgaris , 1971 .

[6]  J. Altman Control of Accept and Reject Reflexes in the Octopus , 1971, Nature.

[7]  D. Newth THE ANATOMY OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM OF OCTOPUS VULGARIS , 1972 .

[8]  C. Hsiao,et al.  Moulting hormone production in the isolated larval abdomen of the Colorado beetle , 1975, Nature.

[9]  C. S. Wardle,et al.  Limit of fish swimming speed , 1975, Nature.

[10]  S. Grillner,et al.  On the Generation and Performance of Swimming in Fish , 1976 .

[11]  R. McNeill Alexander,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of animal locomotion , 1977 .

[12]  A. Blight THE MUSCULAR CONTROL OF VERTEBRATE SWIMMING MOVEMENTS , 1977 .

[13]  J J Blum,et al.  Bend propagation in flagella. I. Derivation of equations of motion and their simulation. , 1978, Biophysical journal.

[14]  W. Kier The functional morphology of the musculature of squid (Loliginidae) arms and tentacles , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[15]  J. Steeves,et al.  Patterns Of Circular And Radial Mantle Muscle Activity in Respiration and Jetting of the Squid Loligo Opalescens , 1983 .

[16]  James F. Wilson Robotic Mechanics and Animal Morphology , 1984 .

[17]  W. Kier,et al.  Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular‐hydrostats , 1985 .

[18]  J. Horgan,et al.  Roboticists aim to ape nature: Engineers are thinking in new ways about sensing, chips, and robots as they study dolphins, slugs, and Homo sapiens , 1986, IEEE Spectrum.

[19]  D M Corcos,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  W. Kier,et al.  Electromyography of the fin musculature of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  J. F. Wilson,et al.  The mechanics and positioning of highly flexible manipulator limbs , 1989 .

[22]  G. Fiorito,et al.  Problem solving ability of Octopus vulgaris Lamarck (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). , 1990, Behavioral and neural biology.

[23]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Fundamentals of motor behavior , 1990 .

[24]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[25]  M. Flanders Temporal patterns of muscle activation for arm movements in three- dimensional space , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Bruce,et al.  ELEPHANT TRUNKS: AN UNFORGETTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO RIGID MECHANISMS , 1991 .

[27]  J. Wilson,et al.  A continuum model of elephant trunks. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  C. E. Jordan A MODEL OF RAPID-START SWIMMING AT INTERMEDIATE REYNOLDS NUMBER: UNDULATORY LOCOMOTION IN THE CHAETOGNATH SAGITTA ELEGANS , 1992 .

[29]  M. Flanders,et al.  Two components of muscle activation: scaling with the speed of arm movement. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  S. Gielen Movement dynamics , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  E. Bizzi Intermediate representations in the formation of arm trajectories , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  T. Williams,et al.  Anguilliform body dynamics: a continuum model for the interaction between muscle activation and body curvature , 1994, Journal of mathematical biology.

[33]  C. S. Wardle,et al.  Tuning in to fish swimming waves: body form, swimming mode and muscle function , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  N. Curtin,et al.  Interactions between muscle activation, body curvature and the water in the swimming lamprey. , 1995, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[35]  M. Dickinson UNSTEADY MECHANISMS OF FORCE GENERATION IN AQUATIC AND AERIAL LOCOMOTION , 1996 .

[36]  Y Gutfreund,et al.  Organization of Octopus Arm Movements: A Model System for Studying the Control of Flexible Arms , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  W. Kier,et al.  Functional design of tentacles in squid : Linking sarcomere ultrastructure to gross morphological dynamics , 1997 .

[38]  Y. Engel,et al.  A dynamical model of the octopus arm , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  W.Z. Rymer,et al.  Role of intrinsic muscle properties in producing smooth movements , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.