Pedagogy of aesthetics: a study of three architectural design studios

Venustas (beauty) in the architectural field is one of the qualities of architecture along with firmitas (firmness) and utilitas (utility). Given that pursuing beauty is one of the roles of an architect/designer, aesthetics, the discussion of beauty, cannot be excluded from architectural education. However, it is rare to find scholarly discussions that include aesthetic education and theory to explain the process of how students obtain knowledge of the aesthetics of architecture. This dissertation explores the pedagogy of aesthetic education in architectural design studios using a grounded theory approach. Based on a multicase study of three outstanding instructors' studios in three different schools, their 40 students and 3 administrators using observations, interviews and document reviews, a theoretical framework of “a process of aesthetic education in the architectural studio” is proposed. Finally, recommendations and implications for design educators are presented.

[1]  Vitruvius Pollio,et al.  Ten Books on Architecture , 2019 .

[2]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[3]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[4]  Jean Paul Carlhian.  The Ecole Des Beaux-Arts: Modes and Manners , 1979 .

[5]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[6]  Wayne Attoe,et al.  Excellent studio teaching in architecture , 1991 .

[7]  J. A. Hatch,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings , 2002 .

[8]  J. Habermas.  Knowledge and Human Interests: A General Perspective , 2008 .

[9]  A. Carlson.  The Aesthetic Appreciation of Environmental Architecture under Different Conceptions of Environment , 2006 .

[10]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Forty years of design research , 2007 .

[11]  Stefani Ledewitz,et al.  Models of Design in Studio Teaching , 1985 .

[12]  I. Kant,et al.  Critique of judgment , 2000 .

[13]  A. Philip McMahon,et al.  The Principles of Art , 1939 .

[14]  D. Cuff.  Architecture: The Story of Practice , 1992 .

[15]  David Wang,et al.  Architectural Research Methods , 2001 .

[16]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Preference and the visual environment: Complexity and some alternatives , 1972 .

[17]  P. Sloterdijk,et al.  Architecture As an Art of Immersion , 2011 .

[18]  N. Goodman,et al.  Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols , 1971 .

[19]  Dang X. Cu,et al.  Architecture: The Story of Practice , 1991 .

[20]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[21]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine , 1996 .

[22]  K. Moore,et al.  THE SCIENTIST, THE SOCIAL ACTIVIST, THE PRACTITIONER AND THE CLERIC: PEDAGOGICAL EXPLORATION TOWARDS A PEDAGOGY OF PRACTICE , 2001 .

[23]  Neil Leach.  Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory , 1997 .

[24]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[25]  R. Scruton.  The aesthetics of architecture , 1979 .

[26]  Anke Oostendorp,et al.  Dimensions in the perception of architecture:II. Measures of exploratory behavior , 1978 .

[27]  C. Bryant.  Kuhn, Paradigms and Sociology , 1975 .

[28]  M. Crotty.  The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[29]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 1966 .

[30]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[31]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[32]  Ashraf M. Salama.  New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the Design Studio , 1995 .

[33]  C. Covington.  The space station - An overview of the design process , 1983 .

[34]  J. Greeno.  Gibson's affordances. , 1994, Psychological review.

[35]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[36]  R. Arnheim,et al.  The Gestalt theory of expression. , 1949, Psychological review.

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[38]  Jon T. Lang,et al.  Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design , 1987 .

[39]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  Perception and landscape: Conceptions and misconceptions. , 1979 .

[40]  T. Whitfield,et al.  The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. , 1979 .

[41]  S. Fienberg,et al.  The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change. , 1991 .

[42]  Rob Cowdroy,et al.  Assessing highly‐creative ability1 , 2005 .

[43]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[44]  G. Anderson,et al.  The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty , 2005 .

[45]  J. Nasar.  Visual Preferences in Urban Street Scenes , 1984 .

[46]  Alain Findeli.  Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion , 2001, Design Issues.

[47]  Thomas E. Wartenberg.  The nature of art : an anthology , 2012 .

[48]  Andrew Bishop.  Outside the square? Aesthetic response to the contemporary architecture of Federation Square, Melbourne , 2007 .

[49]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[50]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[51]  David Williamson Shaffer,et al.  Design, collaboration, and computation: the design studio as a model for computer supported collaboration in mathematics , 1997, CSCL.

[52]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[53]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[54]  Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling,et al.  The philosophy of art , 2008 .

[55]  Ellen Dissanayake.  THE ARTS AFTER DARWIN: DOES ART HAVE AN ORIGIN AND ADAPTIVE FUNCTION? , 2008 .

[56]  Donald W. Hine,et al.  Decoding Modern Architecture , 2000 .

[57]  J. Pile.  History of Interior Design , 1987 .

[58]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[59]  Gifford Robert,et al.  WHY ARCHITECTS AND LAYPERSONS JUDGE BUILDINGS DIFFERENTLY: COGNITIVE PROPERTIES AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND PHYSICAL BASES , 2002 .

[60]  Giovanni Luzzi.  Modernism , 1913 .

[61]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  Focus on architectural design process through learning styles , 2003 .

[62]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[63]  J. Christopher Jones,et al.  Design methods: Seeds of human futures , 1970 .

[64]  C. Webb.  The Action Research Dissertation. A Guide for Students and Faculty , 2007 .

[65]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education , 1998 .

[66]  R. Behrens.  Art, Design and Gestalt Theory , 2017 .

[67]  Maurice Lagueux.  Ethics versus Aesthetics in Architecture , 2004 .

[68]  James J. Gibson,et al.  The ecological approach to perception , 1977 .

[69]  J. Collier.  The Art of Moral Imagination: Ethics in the Practice of Architecture , 2006 .

[70]  P. Hekkert.  Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design , 2006 .

[71]  L. Tolstoy,et al.  What Is Art , 1897 .

[72]  Kathryn H. Anthony,et al.  Design Juries on Trial: The Renaissance of the Design Studio , 1991 .

[73]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. , 2006 .

[74]  Robert Venturi,et al.  Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture: Selections from a Forthcoming Book , 1965 .

[75]  L. B. Alberti,et al.  Ten books on architecture , 1956 .

[76]  Michael A. Bunch.  Core Curriculum in Architectural Education , 1993 .

[77]  Rabee M. Reffat.  Computing in architectural design: reflections and an approach to new generations of CAAD , 2006, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[78]  Richard Hill.  Designs and their Consequences: Architecture and Aesthetics , 1999 .

[79]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[80]  J. K. Ochsner,et al.  Behind the Mask: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Interaction in the Design Studio , 2000 .

[81]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[82]  J. Nasar,et al.  The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same , 1989 .

[83]  John Chris Jones,et al.  Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures , 1981 .

[84]  Rudolf Arnheim.  The dynamics of architectural form : based on the 1975 Mary Duke Biddle lectures at the Cooper Union , 1977 .

[85]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[86]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[87]  J. Maxwell.  Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[88]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Comparing paradigms for describing design activity , 1995 .

[89]  Elizabeth Marie Graham.  Studio design critique: student and faculty expectations and reality , 2003 .

[90]  S. Kaplan.  Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition , 1987 .

[91]  D. A. Schon.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992 .

[92]  Amos Rapoport,et al.  Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards a Man Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design , 1977 .

[93]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[94]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[95]  Architectural Education , 1908, Nature.

[96]  David Brady,et al.  UNDERSTANDING ARCHITECTURE.: Its Elements, History and Meaning , 1994 .