Impacts of Multiple Stresses on Water Demand and Supply Across the Southeastern United States 1

Abstract:  Assessment of long-term impacts of projected changes in climate, population, and land use and land cover on regional water resource is critical to the sustainable development of the southeastern United States. The objective of this study was to fully budget annual water availability for water supply (precipitation − evapotranspiration + groundwater supply + return flow) and demand from commercial, domestic, industrial, irrigation, livestock, mining, and thermoelectric uses. The Water Supply Stress Index and Water Supply Stress Index Ratio were developed to evaluate water stress conditions over time and across the 666 eight-digit Hydrologic Unit Code basins in the 13 southeastern states. Predictions from two Global Circulation Models (CGC1 and HadCM2Sul), one land use change model, and one human population model, were integrated to project future water supply stress in 2020. We found that population increase greatly stressed water supply in metropolitan areas located in the Piedmont region and Florida. Predicted land use and land cover changes will have little effect on water quantity and water supply-water demand relationship. In contrast, climate changes had the most pronounced effects on regional water supply and demand, especially in western Texas where water stress was historically highest in the study region. The simulation system developed by this study is useful for water resource planners to address water shortage problems such as those experienced during 2007 in the study region. Future studies should focus on refining the water supply term to include flow exchanges between watersheds and constraints of water quality and environmental flows to water availability for human use.

[1]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  Projecting U.S. freshwater withdrawals , 2000 .

[2]  A. Thomson,et al.  SIMULATED IMPACTS OF EL NINO/SOUTHERN OSCILLATION ON UNITED STATES WATER RESOURCES 1 , 2003 .

[3]  M. C. MacCracken,et al.  The U.S. Global Change Research Program , 1994 .

[4]  David N. Wear,et al.  Responsiveness of Rural and Urban Land Uses to Land Rent Determinants in the U.S. South , 2000 .

[5]  G. Suna,et al.  Regional annual water yield from forest lands and its response to potential deforestation across the southeastern United States , 2022 .

[6]  Sujoy B. Roy,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SUSTAINABILITY OF WATER WITHDRAWALS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995 TO 20251 , 2005 .

[7]  Ge Sun,et al.  MODELING ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM FORESTED WATERSHEDS ACROSS THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES 1 , 2003 .

[8]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  ESTIMATES OF RUNOFF USING WATER‐BALANCE AND ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS 1 , 1999 .

[9]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[10]  Steven G. McNulty,et al.  REGIONAL HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE OF LOBLOLLY PINE TO AIR TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION CHANGES 1 , 1997 .

[11]  William F. Ritter,et al.  Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering , 1983 .

[12]  M. Jha,et al.  CLIMATE CHHANGE SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT ON UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN STREAMFLOWS USING SWAT 1 , 2006 .

[13]  Petra Döll,et al.  Impact of Climate Change and Variability on Irrigation Requirements: A Global Perspective , 2002 .

[14]  Andrew A. Keller,et al.  Effects of Climate Change on U.S. Irrigation , 1990 .

[15]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  CONTINENTAL SCALE SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE 1 , 1999 .