Computed Tomography Angiography Identified High-Risk Coronary Plaques: From Diagnosis to Prognosis and Future Management

CT angiography has become, in recent years, a main evaluating modality for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent advancements in the field have allowed us to identity not only the presence of obstructive disease but also the characteristics of identified lesions. High-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques are identified in CT angiographies via a number of specific characteristics and may provide prognostic and therapeutic implications, aiming to prevent future ischemic events via optimizing medical treatment or providing coronary interventions. In light of new evidence evaluating the safety and efficacy of intervening in high-risk plaques, even in non-flow-limiting disease, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the diagnostic algorithms and implications of plaque vulnerability in CT angiography, identify any differences with invasive imaging, analyze prognostic factors and potential future therapeutic options in such patients, as well as discuss new frontiers, including intervening in non-flow-limiting stenoses and the role of CT angiography in patient stratification.

[1]  Xue-wen Gao,et al.  Longitudinal assessment of coronary plaque regression related to sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor using coronary computed tomography angiography , 2024, Cardiovascular diabetology.

[2]  H. Garcia-Garcia,et al.  Paclitaxel-coated balloons for vulnerable lipid-rich plaques. , 2024, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Hermanides,et al.  Vulnerable plaque features and adverse events in patients with diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis of the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial. , 2024, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  Hyun Kuk Kim,et al.  Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Quantitative Coronary Plaque and Hemodynamic Analysis for Predicting Acute Coronary Syndrome. , 2024, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  C. Chrysohoou,et al.  Management of dyslipidemia in coronary artery disease: the present and the future. , 2024, Coronary artery disease.

[6]  J. Chae,et al.  Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy alone for the treatment of vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaques (PREVENT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2024, The Lancet.

[7]  P. van der Harst,et al.  DEep LearnIng-based QuaNtification of epicardial adipose tissue predicts MACE in patients undergoing stress CMR. , 2024, Atherosclerosis.

[8]  U. Morbiducci,et al.  Impact of endothelial shear stress on coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and composition: A meta-analysis and systematic review. , 2024, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  M. van Assen,et al.  Intra- and Inter-Reader Reproducibility in Quantitative Coronary Plaque Analysis on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. , 2024, Current problems in cardiology.

[10]  K. Tsioufis,et al.  The potential future role of extensive lipid lowering in ACS patients with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors: Early bird catches the worm. , 2023, European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.

[11]  D. Dey,et al.  Quantification of Low-Attenuation Plaque Burden from Coronary CT Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Intravascular US. , 2023, Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging.

[12]  K. Tsioufis,et al.  LOX-1 Receptor: A diagnostic tool and therapeutic target in atherogenesis. , 2023, Current problems in cardiology.

[13]  G. Pontone,et al.  Coronary Plaque Characteristics Associated With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Atherosclerotic Patients and Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2023, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  Liu Yang,et al.  Development and Validation of CCTA-based Radiomics Signature for Predicting Coronary Plaques With Rapid Progression. , 2023, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  Computed tomography measured epicardial adipose tissue and psoas muscle attenuation: new biomarkers to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality in patients with heart disease and critically ill patients. Part I: Epicardial adipose tissue , 2023, Anaesthesiology intensive therapy.

[16]  C. McCollough,et al.  Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Versus Energy-Integrating Detector Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Calcium Quantitation , 2023, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  J. Albarrán-Juárez,et al.  Mechanisms of fibrous cap formation in atherosclerosis , 2023, Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine.

[18]  L. Räber,et al.  Concomitant Coronary Atheroma Regression and Stabilization in Response to Lipid-Lowering Therapy. , 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Dave L Dixon,et al.  2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2023, Circulation.

[20]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Age- and Sex-Specific Nomographic CT Quantitative Plaque Data From a Large International Cohort. , 2023, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[21]  G. Pontone,et al.  The Role of Non-Invasive Multimodality Imaging in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Anatomical and Functional Pathways , 2023, Diagnostics.

[22]  L. Pérez de Isla,et al.  Alirocumab and Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The ARCHITECT Study , 2023, Circulation.

[23]  G. Paolisso,et al.  SGLT2-inhibitors effects on the coronary fibrous cap thickness and MACEs in diabetic patients with inducible myocardial ischemia and multi vessels non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis , 2023, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[24]  M. van Straten,et al.  Photon-counting CT: Review of initial clinical results. , 2023, European journal of radiology.

[25]  G. Leftheriotis,et al.  Atherosclerosis Calcification: Focus on Lipoproteins , 2023, Metabolites.

[26]  Yongyue Wei,et al.  A Coronary CT Angiography Radiomics Model to Identify Vulnerable Plaque and Predict Cardiovascular Events. , 2023, Radiology.

[27]  Y. Raja,et al.  Is Ct Coronary Angiography (ctca) A New Gold Standard For Diagnosis Of Coronary Artery Disease? - Comparison Of Ctca And Invasive Coronary Angiography (ica) , 2023, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

[28]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Clinical and Coronary Plaque Predictors of Atherosclerotic Nonresponse to Statin Therapy. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[29]  Jinsun Park,et al.  Epicardial Adipose Tissue Thickness Is Related to Plaque Composition in Coronary Artery Disease , 2022, Diagnostics.

[30]  J. Granada,et al.  Long-term outcomes of patients with normal fractional flow reserve and thin-cap fibroatheroma. , 2022, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[31]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  First in-human quantitative plaque characterization with ultra-high resolution coronary photon-counting CT angiography , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[32]  J. Earls,et al.  Interobserver variability among expert readers quantifying plaque volume and plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography: a CLARIFY trial sub-study. , 2022, Clinical imaging.

[33]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Relationship of Plaque Features at Coronary CT to Coronary Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Events. , 2022, Radiology.

[34]  Sidney C. Smith,et al.  2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Nonstatin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. , 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  D. Dey,et al.  Plaque Burden and 1-Year Outcomes in Acute Chest Pain: Results From the Multicenter RAPID-CTCA Trial. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[36]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Ultra-High-Resolution Coronary CT Angiography With Photon-Counting Detector CT , 2022, Investigative radiology.

[37]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Analysis of Calcium Content to Identify Non-culprit Vulnerable Plaques in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[38]  L. Räber,et al.  Effect of Alirocumab Added to High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The PACMAN-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2022, JAMA.

[39]  D. Dey,et al.  Deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: an international multicentre study , 2022, The Lancet. Digital health.

[40]  K. Vandenbroeck,et al.  Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[41]  Hong Wang,et al.  Effect of Evolocumab on Coronary Plaque Phenotype and Burden in Statin-Treated Patients Following Myocardial Infarction. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[42]  L. Boussel,et al.  Coronary CT Angiography with Photon-counting CT: First-In-Human Results. , 2022, Radiology.

[43]  D. Dey,et al.  Radiomics-Based Precision Phenotyping Identifies Unstable Coronary Plaques From Computed Tomography Angiography. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[44]  Xi-Long Zheng,et al.  PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) Triggers Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Senescence and Apoptosis: Implication of Its Direct Role in Degenerative Vascular Disease , 2021, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[45]  K. Nakagawa,et al.  Accumulation of Plasma-Derived Lipids in the Lipid Core and Necrotic Core of Human Atheroma: Imaging Mass Spectrometry and Histopathological Analyses , 2021, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[46]  P. Barlis,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Colchicine on Coronary Plaque Phenotype After Myocardial Infarction with Optical Coherence Tomography: Rationale and Design of the COCOMO-ACS Study , 2021, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

[47]  R. Rajani,et al.  Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial , 2021, European heart journal.

[48]  Nima Abbasian Vascular Calcification Mechanisms: Updates and Renewed Insight into Signaling Pathways Involved in High Phosphate-Mediated Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification , 2021, Biomedicines.

[49]  H. Marques,et al.  CT ​EvaLuation ​by ​ARtificial ​Intelligence ​For ​Atherosclerosis, Stenosis and Vascular ​MorphologY ​(CLARIFY): ​A ​Multi-center, international study. , 2021, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[50]  Neha J. Pagidipati,et al.  Risk Stratification With the Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[51]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Sex-Specific Computed Tomography Coronary Plaque Characterization and Risk of Myocardial Infarction. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[52]  P. Libby The changing landscape of atherosclerosis , 2021, Nature.

[53]  M. Henein,et al.  High Coronary Wall Shear Stress Worsens Plaque Vulnerability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2021, Angiology.

[54]  D. Dey,et al.  Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography / North American Society of Cardiovascular Imaging - Expert consensus document on coronary CT imaging of atherosclerotic plaque. , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[55]  Ulf J Jensen,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[56]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Radiomics in medical imaging—“how-to” guide and critical reflection , 2020, Insights into Imaging.

[57]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Added value of high-risk plaque criteria by coronary CTA for prediction of long-term outcomes. , 2020, Atherosclerosis.

[58]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction , 2020, Circulation.

[59]  A. Scholte,et al.  Impact of Clinical Characteristics and Statins on Coronary Plaque Progression by Serial Computed Tomography Angiography , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[60]  Xinfeng Liu,et al.  Calcification in Atherosclerotic Plaque Vulnerability: Friend or Foe? , 2020, Frontiers in Physiology.

[61]  M. Budoff,et al.  Effect of semaglutide on coronary atherosclerosis progression in patients with type II diabetes: rationale and design of the semaglutide treatment on coronary progressiontrial. , 2019, Coronary artery disease.

[62]  A. Kroon,et al.  The Role of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Arterial Remodeling: Focus on Calcification-Related Processes , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[63]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. , 2019, European heart journal.

[64]  P. Libby,et al.  Atherosclerosis , 2019, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[65]  Michael T. Lu,et al.  Radiomics versus Visual and Histogram-based Assessment to Identify Atheromatous Lesions at Coronary CT Angiography: An ex Vivo Study , 2019, Radiology.

[66]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Identification of High-Risk Plaques Destined to Cause Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[67]  J. L. Ding,et al.  Capturing the Fantastic Voyage of Monocytes Through Time and Space , 2019, Front. Immunol..

[68]  Yasutaka Baba,et al.  Machine-learning integration of CT histogram analysis to evaluate the composition of atherosclerotic plaques: Validation with IB-IVUS. , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[69]  P. Libby,et al.  Reassessing the Mechanisms of Acute Coronary Syndromes: The “Vulnerable Plaque” and Superficial Erosion , 2019, Circulation research.

[70]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Coronary Artery Plaque Characteristics Associated With Adverse Outcomes in the SCOT-HEART Study , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[71]  J. Hecksher-Sørensen,et al.  The GLP-1 Analogs Liraglutide and Semaglutide Reduce Atherosclerosis in ApoE−/− and LDLr−/− Mice by a Mechanism That Includes Inflammatory Pathways , 2018, JACC. Basic to translational science.

[72]  R. Arsanjani,et al.  Comparison of Computed Tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve to invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Diagnosis of Functional Coronary Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[73]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Effects of Statins on Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques: The PARADIGM Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[74]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Coronary Atherosclerotic Precursors of Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[75]  Michael T. Lu,et al.  Use of High-Risk Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Detection for Risk Stratification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, JAMA cardiology.

[76]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Coronary CT angiography characteristics of OCT-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma: a section-to-section comparison study , 2018, European Radiology.

[77]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Radiomic Features Are Superior to Conventional Quantitative Computed Tomographic Metrics to Identify Coronary Plaques With Napkin-Ring Sign , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[78]  E. Osorio,et al.  Oxidized LDL triggers changes in oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers in human macrophages , 2017, Redox biology.

[79]  Adam J. Brown,et al.  Association of Epicardial Adipose Tissue and High‐Risk Plaque Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[80]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  The high-risk criteria low-attenuation plaque <60 HU and the napkin-ring sign are the most powerful predictors of MACE: a long-term follow-up study , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[81]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[82]  B. Trigatti,et al.  Macrophage Apoptosis and Necrotic Core Development in Atherosclerosis: A Rapidly Advancing Field with Clinical Relevance to Imaging and Therapy. , 2017, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[83]  W. Koenig,et al.  Effect of Evolocumab on Progression of Coronary Disease in Statin-Treated Patients: The GLAGOV Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[84]  Vagheesh M. Narasimhan,et al.  Extensive Proliferation of a Subset of Differentiated, yet Plastic, Medial Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Contributes to Neointimal Formation in Mouse Injury and Atherosclerosis Models , 2016, Circulation research.

[85]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[86]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics , 2016, Heart.

[87]  J. Stehli,et al.  Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[88]  L. Shaw,et al.  Plaque Characterization by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and the Likelihood of Acute Coronary Events in Mid-Term Follow-Up. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[89]  M. Goddard,et al.  Dual-energy computed tomography imaging to determine atherosclerotic plaque composition: A prospective study with tissue validation , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[90]  Yu Kataoka,et al.  Spotty calcification and plaque vulnerability in vivo: frequency-domain optical coherence tomography analysis. , 2014, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[91]  J. Balligand,et al.  Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol-induced endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress: the role of statins. , 2014, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling.

[92]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Histogram Analysis of Lipid-Core Plaques in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: Ex Vivo Validation Against Histology , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[93]  M. Goddard,et al.  Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition and Classification Identified by Coronary Computed Tomography: Assessment of Computed Tomography–Generated Plaque Maps Compared With Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound and Histology , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[94]  K. Awai,et al.  Noncalcified atherosclerotic lesions with vulnerable characteristics detected by coronary CT angiography and future coronary events. , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[95]  E Peña,et al.  Comparison of the vulnerability risk for positive versus negative atheroma plaque morphology. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[96]  K. Shimada,et al.  Napkin-ring sign on coronary CT angiography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[97]  Matthias F Kriegel,et al.  The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[98]  M. Budoff,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography and calcium score for major adverse cardiac events in outpatients. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[99]  R. Virmani,et al.  Histopathological correlates of the napkin-ring sign plaque in coronary CT angiography. , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[100]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Spectral CT imaging of vulnerable plaque with two independent biomarkers , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[101]  K. Shimada,et al.  Non-obstructive low attenuation coronary plaque predicts three-year acute coronary syndrome events in patients with hypertension: multidetector computed tomographic study. , 2012, Journal of cardiology.

[102]  Peter Libby,et al.  Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[103]  Michael C. McDaniel,et al.  Coronary Artery Wall Shear Stress Is Associated With Progression and Transformation of Atherosclerotic Plaque and Arterial Remodeling in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 2011, Circulation.

[104]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of spotty calcifications on computed tomography angiography: Comparison to plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[105]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Positive remodeling on coronary computed tomography as a marker for plaque vulnerability on virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[106]  Yoshinobu Morikawa,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: comparison with intravascular optical coherence tomography. , 2011, International journal of cardiology.

[107]  Zhen Qian,et al.  Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characterist , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[108]  L. Folkersen,et al.  Tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 is induced by fluid shear stress in vascular smooth muscle cells and affects cell proliferation and survival. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[109]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Feasibility of noninvasive assessment of thin-cap fibroatheroma by multidetector computed tomography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[110]  R. Virmani,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[111]  Jong Chun Park,et al.  Positive remodeling is associated with more plaque vulnerability and higher frequency of plaque prolapse accompanied with post-procedural cardiac enzyme elevation compared with intermediate/negative remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, Journal of cardiology.

[112]  Jinsun Park,et al.  Comparison of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with spectral analysis of intravascular ultrasound backscatter signals for characterizations of noncalcified coronary arterial plaques. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[113]  J. Ishii,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by 0.5-mm-slice multislice computed tomographic imaging. , 2007, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[114]  M Valgimigli,et al.  Coronary artery remodelling is related to plaque composition , 2005, Heart.

[115]  K. Shimada,et al.  Early Statin Treatment in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Demonstration of the Beneficial Effect on Atherosclerotic Lesions by Serial Volumetric Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis During Half a Year After Coronary Event: The ESTABLISH Study , 2004, Circulation.

[116]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Report of a meeting on the vulnerable plaque, June 17 and 18, 2003, Santorini, Greece. , 2004, European heart journal.

[117]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[118]  Paul Schoenhagen,et al.  Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[119]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction and stable angina pectoris determined by contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[120]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[121]  M. Davies,et al.  Relationship Between Coronary Artery Remodeling and Plaque Vulnerability , 2002, Circulation.

[122]  C Georg,et al.  Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[123]  R. Virmani,et al.  Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. , 2000, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[124]  R. Virmani,et al.  Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[125]  P. Stone,et al.  Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute cardiovascular disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[126]  Yi-da Tang,et al.  Coronary Artery Disease: From Mechanism to Clinical Practice. , 2020, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[127]  N. Weissman,et al.  Attenuated plaque detected by intravascular ultrasound: clinical, angiographic, and morphologic features and post-percutaneous coronary intervention complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[128]  M. Clearfield Effect of very high intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2007, Current atherosclerosis reports.

[129]  M. Davies,et al.  Anatomic features in victims of sudden coronary death. Coronary artery pathology. , 1992, Circulation.