Patterns of affix borrowing in a sample of 100 languages

Borrowing affixes may be rare compared to lexical borrowing, but it is not random. The current study describes regular patterns of affix borrowing in a database containing 649 borrowed affixes, challenging a number of previous claims about relative borrowability, in particular regarding inflectional categories. It is shown that borrowing affixes of all major nominal and verbal inflectional categories, including case markers and argument indexes, is well attested. Borrowing case markers, for instance, appears to be just as common as borrowing plural markers. By factoring in the “availability” for borrowing (i.e. whether a potential donor language has a relevant affix), it can be shown that nominal categories are far more frequently borrowed than verbal categories. Additionally, it is shown that sets of borrowed affixes often consist of interrelated sets of forms, e.g. forming paradigms, rather than being isolated forms from different morphosyntactic systems, in particular for the more tightly integrated inflectional subsystems. The frequency and systematicity by which inflectional affixes are borrowed calls for a reconsideration of the role of inflection in models of language contact.

[1]  Tom Güldemann Reconstruction through ‘de-construction’: The marking of person, gender, and number in the Khoe family and Kwadi , 2004 .

[2]  Rainer Vossen,et al.  Die Khoe-Sprachen : ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Sprachgeschichte Afrikas , 1997 .

[3]  B. J. Hoff,et al.  The Linguistic Repertory of the Island-Carib in the Seventeenth Century: The Men's Language: A Carib Pidgin? , 1980, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[4]  Maarten Kossmann Parallel System Borrowing: Parallel morphological systems due to the borrowing of paradigms , 2010 .

[5]  Jeffrey Heath,et al.  Basic materials in Warndarang: Grammar, texts, and dictionary , 1980 .

[6]  Carol Myers-Scotton,et al.  Contact Linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes , 2013 .

[7]  N. Vakhtin,et al.  Aleut in contact: The cia enigma , 1990 .

[8]  Felicity Meakins,et al.  Borrowing contextual inflection: evidence from northern Australia , 2011 .

[9]  Yaron Matras,et al.  Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective , 2007 .

[10]  Y. Matras,et al.  Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing , 1998 .

[11]  Patrick O. Steinkrüger Morphological processes of word formation in Chabacano (Philippine Spanish Creole) , 2003 .

[12]  Carol Myers-Scotton,et al.  Language Contact: Why Outsider System Morphemes Resist Transfer , 2008 .

[13]  Felicity Meakins,et al.  Gurindji Kriol: A Mixed Language Emerges from Code-switching , 2005 .

[14]  Felicity Meakins,et al.  Case-Marking in Contact: The development and function of case morphology in Gurindji Kriol , 2011 .

[15]  D. Taylor Languages of the West Indies , 1977 .

[16]  Francesco Gardani,et al.  Borrowing of Inflectional Morphemes in Language Contact , 2008 .

[17]  Helka Riionheimo How to borrow a bound morpheme? Evaluating the status of structural interference in a contact between closely-related languages , 2002 .

[18]  Pieter Muysken,et al.  Spanish affixes in the Quechua languages: A multidimensional perspective , 2012 .

[19]  Douglas Taylor,et al.  Island Carib II: Word-Classes, Affixes, Nouns, and Verbs , 1956, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[20]  B. J. Hoff Evidentiality in carib Particles, affixes, and a variant of Wackernagel's law , 1986 .

[21]  Frank Seifart,et al.  The principle of morphosyntactic subsystem integrity in language contact: Evidence from morphological borrowing in Resígaro (Arawakan) , 2012 .

[22]  Brigitte Pakendorf,et al.  A comparison of copied morphemes in Sakha (Yakut) and Ėven , 2015 .

[23]  Francesco Gardani,et al.  Borrowed morphology: an overview , 2015 .

[24]  Geert Booij,et al.  Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis , 1995 .

[25]  Frank Seifart,et al.  Direct and indirect affix borrowing , 2015 .

[26]  Lyle Campbell On Proposed Universals of Grammatical Borrowing , 1993 .

[27]  D. Taylor Diachronic Note on the Carib Contribution to Island Carib , 1954, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[28]  Sarah G. Thomason When is the diffusion of inflectional morphology not dispreferred , 2015 .

[29]  Jeffrey Heath,et al.  Basic materials in Ritharngu: Grammar, texts, and dictionary , 1980 .

[30]  John M. Lipski New thoughts on the origins of Zamboangueño (Philippine Creole Spanish) , 1992 .

[31]  F. Gardani 4. Plural across inflection and derivation, fusion and agglutination , 2012 .