Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region

What role should the academic anchor play in the development of a high-tech region? Based on analysis of historical data and archival documents, this article explores the question by looking at an illuminating case, the relationship between Stanford University and Silicon Valley, the quintessential high-tech entrepreneurial region. During the Valley9s crucial formative years (1945-1965), Stanford had four principal programs of outreach to the local business community. In each case, Stanford9s default mode of industrial outreach was to seek satellite operations of established firms based elsewhere (such as Lockheed), while its assistance to indigenous firms (and start-ups) was ancillary at best. For those trying to establish a high-tech region elsewhere, the lesson may be not to try to replicate Silicon Valley9s contemporary university-industry relationship and the central role of entrepreneurship. The Valley9s formative years offer a different model for the contributions of an academic anchor to the development of a high-tech region.

[1]  T. Sturgeon.  How Silicon Valley Came to Be , 2000 .

[2]  Thomas B Heinrich,et al.  Cold War Armory: Military Contracting in Silicon Valley , 2002, Enterprise & Society.

[3]  Stuart W. Leslie,et al.  Regional Disadvantage: Replicating Silicon Valley in New York's Capital Region , 2001 .

[4]  Margaret O'Mara.  Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley , 2005 .

[5]  A. Cooper,et al.  The Founding of Technologically-Based Firms. , 1971 .

[6]  A. Saxenian.  The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[7]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[8]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[9]  David A. Kaplan,et al.  The Silicon Boys: And Their Valley of Dreams , 1999 .

[10]  R. Kargon,et al.  Selling Silicon Valley: Frederick Terman's Model for Regional Advantage , 1996, Business History Review.

[11]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  ‘Old Economy’ Inputs for ‘New Economy’ Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys , 2001 .

[12]  Christophe Lécuyer.  What do Universities Really owe Industry? The Case of Solid State Electronics at Stanford , 2005 .

[13]  Roger L. Geiger,et al.  The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford , 1993 .

[14]  B. Harrison.  Concentrated Economic Power and Silicon Valley , 1994 .

[15]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[16]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[17]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[18]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128: AnnaLee Saxenian, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994) 226 pp; Price [UK pound]19.95, ISBN 0 674 75339 9 , 1996 .

[19]  John M. Quigley,et al.  The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale , 2002 .

[20]  Roger L. Geiger,et al.  To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900–1940 by Roger L. Geiger (review) , 1986, Technology and Culture.

[21]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Taiwan's Hsinchu Region , 2004 .

[22]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Venture capital-financed innovation and technological change in the USA , 1988 .

[23]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Technology in the Garden: Research Parks and Regional Economic Development , 1991 .

[24]  Dirk Hanson,et al.  The New Alchemists: Silicon Valley and the Microelectronics Revolution , 1982 .

[25]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley , 1990 .

[26]  R. Geiger.  Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II , 1994 .

[27]  M. Kenney,et al.  Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1999 .

[28]  Anthony Leone,et al.  The Impact of a Research University in Silicon Valley , 2000 .

[29]  New Industrial Cities? The Four Faces of Silicon Valley , 1998 .

[30]  A. Saxenian.  In search of power: the organization of business interests in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1989 .

[31]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[32]  Stephen B. Adams,et al.  Regionalism in Stanford's Contribution to the Rise of Silicon Valley , 2003, Enterprise & Society.

[33]  S. Leslie,et al.  Winning Markets or Winning Nobel Prizes? Kaist and the Challenges of Late Industrialization , 1998, Osiris.

[34]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[35]  Richard Florida,et al.  Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development , 1999 .

[36]  Sankaran Venkataraman,et al.  Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[37]  M. Kenney.  5 Paths and Regions-The Creation and Growth of Silicon Valley , 2007 .

[38]  B. Mahadevan.  Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy , 2000 .

[39]  J. A. English-Lueck,et al.  Trusting Strangers: Work Relationships in Four High-Tech Communities , 2002 .

[40]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Innovation: Location Matters , 2001 .

[41]  Martin Kenney.  The Coevolution of Technologies and Institutions: Silicon Valley as the Iconic High-Technology Cluster , 2006 .

[42]  T. Lenoir.  Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines , 1997 .

[43]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Economic Action Does Not Take Place in a Vacuum: Understanding Cisco's Acquisition and Development Strategy , 2002 .

[44]  J. Mathews.  A Silicon Island of the East: Creating a Semiconductor Industry in Singapore , 1999 .

[45]  Rethinking Silicon Valley: New Perspectives on Regional Development , 2001 .

[46]  John W. Servos,et al.  Changing Partners: The Mellon Institute, Private Industry, and the Federal Patron , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[47]  Christophe Lécuyer.  MIT, progressive reform, and industrial service, 1890-1920 , 1995 .

[48]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Silicon Valley and Route 128 Won't Save Us , 1990 .

[49]  W. Bernard Carlson,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship and Engineering Education: Dugald C. Jackson and the MIT-GE Cooperative Engineering Course, 1907–1932 , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[50]  Bruce E. Seely.  Creating the Cold War University: The Transformation of Stanford , 1999 .

[51]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[52]  M. Kenney.  Understanding silicon valley : the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region , 2000 .

[53]  David J. Teece,et al.  Foreign Investment and Technological Development in Silicon Valley , 1992 .

[54]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Contrasting Patterns of Business Organization in Silicon Valley , 1992 .

[55]  Michael S. Malone,et al.  The Big Score: The Billion Dollar Story of Silicon Valley , 1985 .