Controlling just-in-sequence flow-production

Analyses of the customer-order process in the automotive industry show that the vision of perfectly synchronized material flows in complex industrial production and logistics environments is still far from having become reality. The traditional strategy of maintaining high safety stock levels to counter the effects of ever more variety and uncertainty in the customer demand leads to unbearable cost in today’s competitive markets. Moreover, the responsiveness in the complex supply networks remains low. Thus, the goals of short order lead-times and on-time deliveries to customers are often missed. This places urgency onto the implementation of highly flexible logistics and production systems. The concept of just-in-sequence flow-production promises to allow for both accommodating rising degrees of product variety and cost efficiency. However, its success is dependent on reliable logistics and the ability to avoid turbulences within the material flows. Thus, it needs control of the stability of order sequences and intelligent strategies to hedge against any disturbances that cannot be proactively removed in the production flow. This paper suggests the introduction of systematic key performance indicators to make process instability transparent and manageable. Based on that, dimensioning methods for hedging against inherent sequence instability of production processes by means of physical or virtual re-sequencing are presented.

[1]  Robert R. Inman,et al.  ASRS sizing for recreating automotive assembly sequences , 2003 .

[2]  Willibald A. Günthner,et al.  Die automobile Welt im Umbruch , 2007 .

[3]  M. Holweg,et al.  Successful Build-to-Order Strategies Start With the Customer , 2001 .

[4]  Sven Spieckermann,et al.  A sequential ordering problem in automotive paint shops , 2004 .

[5]  Andrew C. Lyons,et al.  Enabling mass customization: extending build-to-order concepts to supply chains , 2004 .

[6]  Dave Alford,et al.  Mass customisation } an automotive perspective , 2000 .

[7]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .

[8]  L. P. Bucklin Postponement, Speculation and the Structure of Distribution Channels , 1965 .

[9]  Kathryn E. Stecke,et al.  Least in-sequence probability heuristic for mixed-volume production lines , 2008 .

[10]  Sebastian Meißner,et al.  Stabilisierung des Auftragsabwicklungsprozesses durch flexible Auftragszuordnung , 2008 .

[11]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Flexibility and rigidity in customization and build-to-order production , 2005 .

[12]  Kees Jan Roodbergen,et al.  A survey of literature on automated storage and retrieval systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  F.-Y. Ding,et al.  Sequence alteration and restoration related to sequenced parts delivery on an automobile mixed-model assembly line with multiple departments , 2004 .

[14]  S. Meißner,et al.  Durchlaufzeitstabilisierung in der Automobilfertigung: Methoden zur Analyse von Einflussgrößen auf die Auftragsreihenfolge , 2007 .

[15]  Willibald A. Günthner Neue Wege in der Automobillogistik , 2007 .

[16]  Robert Wilson Guarding the line: Infuse lean implementations with ergonomics to protect employees , 2005 .

[17]  Herbert Meyr,et al.  Supply chain planning in the German automotive industry , 2004, OR Spectr..