Reducing plan variations in delivering sustainable building projects

Abstract In line with promoting the mission of sustainable development, the sustainable building practice has been increasingly adopted in recent years. However, the process of delivering a high performance sustainable building has led to a more complex construction practice through the increment of specialized processes. Such complexities have affected construction sequencing and timing, leading to workflow variability and excess in the estimated construction time and cost. In this study reducing plan variations is considered a key improvement in the delivery process of sustainable building projects. This research used the Last Planner System (LPS) to develop a more reliable production planning process to reduce plan variations. A case study was conducted focusing on the measurement of production performance of activities and the reasons for non-completion before and after LPS implementation. The critical areas relating to poor production performance of activities were identified. Results demonstrated differences in production performance and causes of plan variations between activities in relation to and with no relation to sustainable deliverables. While the difference in the production performance is not considerable, the difference in the causes of variability is significant. The implementation of LPS resulted in a significant reduction of plan variations. As variability decreased, production performance of activities increased. The findings from this study contribute to alternative methods for an effective production planning process for sustainable building projects.

[1]  David Gann,et al.  Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan , 1996 .

[2]  Olusegun O. Faniran,et al.  Application of the Lean Production Concept to Improving the Construction Planning Process , 1997 .

[3]  David R. Riley,et al.  Delivering Sustainability: Lean Principles for Green Projects , 2005 .

[4]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance , 2000 .

[5]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Investigating the relationship between planning reliability and project performance , 2007 .

[6]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Assessing the Impacts of Implementing Lean Construction , 2008 .

[7]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[8]  Jack C. P. Cheng,et al.  Collaborative System for HK-BEAM Green Building Certification , 2012, CDVE.

[9]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Lean project management , 2003 .

[10]  Min Liu,et al.  Using Last Planner and a Risk Assessment Matrix to Reduce Variation in Mechanical Related Construction Tasks , 2012 .

[11]  Ron Basu,et al.  Implementing Six Sigma and Lean: A practical guide to tools and techniques , 2009 .

[12]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[13]  R. Eccles The quasifirm in the construction industry , 1981 .

[14]  Herman Glenn Ballard,et al.  THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM OF PRODUCTION CONTROL , 2000 .

[15]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[16]  Ivica Završki,et al.  Reducing Variability to Improve Performance as a Lean Construction Principle , 2002 .

[17]  Lars Stehn,et al.  Lean principles in industrialized housing production: the need for a cultural change , 2008 .

[18]  Yupeng Luo,et al.  Delivering green buildings: Process improvements for sustainable construction , 2006 .

[19]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  Role of the Fabricator in Labor Productivity , 2000 .