Stress changes in intervertebral discs of the cervical spine due to partial discectomies and fusion.

Spine discectomy and fusion is a widely used surgical procedure to correct irreversible degenerative diseases and injuries to the intervertebral disk. The surgical procedure involves the removal of the damage disk material, the decortication of the fusion site, and the placement of the bone graft. Fusion is believed to generate additional stresses in the neighboring disks, which can subsequently lead to new disk degeneration and re-operation. The autologous bone has proven to be the best material for the fusion. However, the autologous bone has three major disadvantages: the high rate of donor site morbidity, the limited and sometimes poor quality of the amounts of bone available, and the extra operative time needed for harvest. For these reasons this study is undertaken to estimate the optimum amount of bone graft needed for a discectomy and correlate it to the change in stress in adjacent levels. A detailed and validated 3D finite element model of the complete human cervical spine (C1-T1) was altered to simulate segmental full and partial discectomies. One full fusion (bone graft occupies about 90% of the vertebral body) and seven partial fusions (bone graft occupies about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 65%, and 75% of the vertebral body) were simulated at each of the four mid- and lower single levels of the cervical spine and the relationship between the change in stresses in the adjacent levels and the bone graft size (area) was studied. The changes in stress were compared with the previously obtained results of the unfused models. The fused and unfused models were preloaded with a 73.6 N compressive force representing the weight of the head and with a 1.5 Nm physiological moment in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. More than 132 cases were analyzed. The results showed that the necessary amount of bone graft needed for discectomy depends on the cervical disk level to be fused and varies between 30% and 75% of the disk area. The results also suggested that there is a threshold size of the bone graft area, before and/or after which, the long-term effects of the change in stresses in adjacent disks are biomechanically consequential.

[1]  B. J. Doherty,et al.  Interspace distraction and graft subsidence after anterior lumbar fusion with femoral strut allograft. , 1993, Spine.

[2]  J. Pilitsis,et al.  Bone healing and spinal fusion. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[3]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  de Mkj Marko Jager,et al.  A THREE-DIMENSIONAL HEAD-NECK MODEL: VALIDATION FOR FRONTAL AND LATERAL IMPACTS , 1994 .

[5]  H. van Mameren,et al.  Cervical Spine Motion in the Sagittal Plane II: Position of Segmental Averaged Instantaneous Centers of Rotation -A Cineradiographic Study , 1992, Spine.

[6]  R. Soames,et al.  Human intervertebral disc: Structure and function , 1988, The Anatomical record.

[7]  J P Paul,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of a cadaver second cervical vertebra. , 1994, Medical & biological engineering & computing.

[8]  A. Cigliano,et al.  Preliminary experience with anterior cervical microdiscectomy and interbody titanium cage fusion (Novus CT-Ti) in patients with cervical disc disease. , 2000, Surgical neurology.

[9]  J. R. Parsons,et al.  Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area. , 1993, Spine.

[10]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .

[11]  A. Sadegh,et al.  An evolutionary Wolff's law for trabecular architecture. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  S. Sepic,et al.  Anterior Discectomy and Fusion for Painful Cervical Disc Disease: A Report of 50 Patients With an Average Follow‐up of 21 Years , 1998, Spine.

[13]  J Oda,et al.  Intervertebral disc changes with aging of human cervical vertebra. From the neonate to the eighties. , 1988, Spine.

[14]  S. Nakano,et al.  Serial Changes in Signal Intensities of the Adjacent Discs on T2-Weighted Sagittal Images after Surgical Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: Anterior Interbody Fusion Versus Expansive Laminoplasty , 2001, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[15]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element analysis of anterior cervical spine interbody fusion. , 1997, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[17]  A. Martins,et al.  Anterior cervical discectomy with and without interbody bone graft. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  J H Keyak,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element modeling of a cervical vertebra: an investigation of burst fracture mechanism. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[19]  K. Ohmori,et al.  Long-term results of the anterior cervical spondylodesis. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[20]  A. Schultz,et al.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  W C Hayes,et al.  Variations of stiffness and strength along the human cervical spine. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  G B Andersson,et al.  Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Finite Element Model Study on Motion Segment Stability Including the Effect of Osteoporosis , 2000, Spine.

[23]  S B Sepic,et al.  Anterior Cervical Fusion for Degenerated or Protruded Discs: A Review of One Hundred Forty-Six Patients , 1984, Spine.

[24]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  T. Whitecloud,et al.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. Anterior decompression and stabilization with autogenous fibula strut graft. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  K. Brolin,et al.  Development of a Finite Element Model of the Upper Cervical Spine and a Parameter Study of Ligament Characteristics , 2004, Spine.

[27]  F. P. Wirth,et al.  Cervical discectomy. A prospective analysis of three operative techniques. , 2000, Surgical neurology.

[28]  A. Sadegh,et al.  A cervical spine model to predict injury scenarios and clinical instability , 2009, Sports biomechanics.

[29]  D. Clements,et al.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion , 1990, Spine.

[30]  D T Davy,et al.  A Kinematic Study of the Cervical Spine Before and After Segmental Arthrodesis , 1998, Spine.

[31]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  The Success of Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis Adjacent to a Previous Fusion , 1997, Spine.

[32]  T. Flynn.  Neurologic Complications of Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion , 1982, Spine.

[33]  M. Ebersold,et al.  Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[34]  Z. Shao,et al.  Radiographic Changes in the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs and Lumbar Vertebrae With Age , 2002, Spine.

[35]  Sung Kyu Ha,et al.  Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3-C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  R. B. Cloward.  The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. , 1958, Journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  R. Robinson,et al.  The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  V. Goel,et al.  Prediction of Load Sharing Among Spinal Components of a C5‐C6 Motion Segment Using the Finite Element Approach , 1998, Spine.

[39]  S. Cowin,et al.  Wolff's law of trabecular architecture at remodeling equilibrium. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  Vijay K. Goel,et al.  Residual Sagittal Motion After Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis With Implications on Radiographic Flexion-Extension Criteria , 2007, Spine.

[41]  E. Benzel,et al.  Biomechanics of bone fusion. , 2001, Neurosurgical focus.

[42]  C. Badgley,et al.  Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[43]  Vertebral stress of a cervical spine model under dynamic load. , 2000, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[44]  P. Lin,et al.  Lumbar interbody fusion , 2009 .

[45]  W. Caspar,et al.  Anterior cervical fusion and trapezoidal plate stabilization for re-do surgery. , 1999, Surgical neurology.

[46]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three‐dimensional load‐displacement curves due to froces on the cervical spine , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[47]  G. Miliaras,et al.  Cervical spondylosis. Part II: surgical management , 2002 .

[48]  G. Andersson,et al.  Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[49]  Y. K. Liu,et al.  Cervical Spine Stiffness and Geometry of the Young Human Male , 1982 .

[50]  N. Epstein.  Evaluation And Treatment Of Clinical Instability Associated With Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Surgery For Ossification Of The Posterior Longitudinal Ligament , 1998 .

[51]  J. Delisle,et al.  Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[52]  Sherk.  The Cervical spine , 1983 .

[53]  K. Furuya,et al.  An analysis of failures in primary cervical anterior spinal cord decompression and fusion. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[54]  V K Goel,et al.  Investigation of vibration characteristics of the ligamentous lumbar spine using the finite element approach. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[55]  W. Lo,et al.  Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[56]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element modeling of the C4-C6 cervical spine unit. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[57]  A. Reeves,et al.  Central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a consecutive series with long-term follow-up evaluation. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[58]  J. Lotz,et al.  Mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc. , 2002, Biochemical Society transactions.

[59]  G Ray,et al.  Mathematical and finite element analysis of spine injuries. , 1987, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[60]  F. P. Wirth,et al.  Anterior cervical discectomy: is fusion necessary? , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[61]  F Lavaste,et al.  A three-dimensional parameterized finite element model of the lower cervical spine. Study of the influence of the posterior articular facets. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[62]  S. Oka,et al.  Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by enlargement of the spinal canal anteriorly, followed by arthrodesis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.